Truck lines navigated through a multitude of challenges in 2020, among them Covid, skyrocketing insurance rates, new regulations, and an ever-crumbling infrastructure. Rebuilding the driver workforce remains the toughest.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
The year 2020 presented many defining moments—and unprecedented challenges—for the trucking industry. The last vestiges of the old paper logbooks finally disappeared as trucks nationwide upgraded to standardized electronic logging devices. Drivers and fleets adjusted to new hours-of-service rules regulating how long they could drive, when to take rest breaks, and when to shut down for the night (or day). States increased tolls and fees. Rising insurance rates and “nuclear verdicts” drove some carriers out of business. Congestion and a crumbling national infrastructure made the job that much tougher.
Then the pandemic hit, further roiling the industry but also shining a well-deserved spotlight on truckers as heroes of the supply chain, stepping up to ensure medical supplies, equipment, and essential goods continued to be delivered during the public health crisis.
Through it all, one fundamental question continued to dog the industry: Where are the drivers? Once again in 2020, trucking saw more experienced, veteran drivers call it a career, exacerbating a shrinking driver pool as far fewer younger men and women entered the profession to replace the retirees. Covid-19 also played a part. In exit interviews, some older at-risk drivers cited worries about the job’s exposure to the public amid rising infection rates, while others left the business to care for family members or relatives who had contracted the virus.
FINDING TOMORROW’S DRIVERS
What can shippers and motor carriers expect as they navigate through 2021? Many of the same challenges from last year, with reinvigorating the driver workforce at the top of the list.
For truck lines to be able to provide sufficient capacity to meet the market’s continued demand, it’s all about getting more professional drivers behind the wheel, notes Greg Orr, executive vice president of U.S. truckload for TFI International. Retention and making sure drivers are utilized efficiently and are paid for every hour they work and mile they drive are the key priorities, he notes.
At Joplin, Missouri-based CFI, a TFI truckload subsidiary with some 2,150 trucks, 7,300 trailers, and 2,300 drivers, “we’re really focused on the driver experience, giving them support at all times, reducing downtime, and keeping them moving,” Orr says.
With new recruits, CFI has adopted what Orr calls a “white glove” service, essentially an aggressive orientation program “designed to create a positive experience for the new driver, with constant engagement to ensure they’re developing successfully. It’s like a concierge service,” he notes, adding that new recruits spend their first 90 days on the road with an experienced driver as a mentor.
A similar program of outreach, support, and communication is in place for current drivers as well. The focus (along with competitive pay): keep them engaged and connected; recognize, and help them overcome, the challenges of the job; and most importantly, show them respect and appreciation for the work they do. The result: CFI’s turnover ratio is down 15 percentage points from last year.
Demand for freight trucking services soared in the second half of 2020 and will likely continue strong through most of 2021, Orr believes. “We are starting the day with 105% to 115% [of available capacity] pre-booked,” he notes, adding that in the current market, CFI is rejecting more than 400 loads a day for lack of capacity. “There’s a ton of freight coming in from the ports and from [domestic] manufacturing. This will ultimately challenge a lot of distribution networks.”
IS PAY BY THE MILE BECOMING OBSOLETE?
Average length of haul (read available pay miles) is decreasing for truckload carriers as e-commerce–influenced distribution networks shrink point-to-point moves and become more regional in design, with more smaller warehouses sited closer to each other and end-users. That’s raising the question of whether the industry’s traditional model of pay by the mile for most truckload driver earnings needs to be changed or perhaps blended with other forms of pay.
“Pay is market driven. You have to be competitive,” says Todd Jadin, vice president of talent management and employee relations for Green Bay, Wisconsin-based Schneider Inc., one of the nation’s largest truckload carriers. “Time is such a key component of a truck driver’s day. We have to look at ways to deal with time and distance components,” he says. “How do you align those to make sure you’re giving the driver a market-competitive wage?”
Moves toward salary pay, daily rates, and guaranteed pay are finding increased traction among some carriers. The most important factor, Jadin believes, is “providing a predictable work schedule” with commensurate predictability in pay. “Take out the variability where possible,” he advises, and build “good, solid, respectful relationships with drivers.” Jadin expects driver pay to stay on an upward trend in 2021, adding that “you will continue to see innovative and unique ways to address driver pay.”
Can a truckload carrier fully switch its drivers from mileage pay to salary? For Ed Nagle, president and chief executive officer of Walbridge, Ohio-based Nagle Companies, the answer is yes. “We are an irregular-route carrier that runs a fair amount of multistop loads in the refrigerated sector,” which, he explains, is one of the least driver-friendly segments of the market.
In Nagle’s business, detention—primarily at consignees’ facilities—is a huge problem. Drivers might have had three to five stops per load but because of shippers missing their appointments and unloading delays, they were experiencing 15 to 20 hours a week of wasted time and excess detention, he says. Under the mileage pay structure, drivers earned a bonus over 2,000 miles a week—yet were penalized for delays not of their doing. “Drivers felt pressure to get those miles in even with the [excessive] detention. We were losing drivers, and the general mood among drivers was not the best,” he recalled.
Nagle made the decision in 2017 to move his drivers to salary pay—and hasn’t looked back. He switched to a model based on linehaul revenue per truck per week. “Most of our major costs were [relatively] fixed, so whether it was 250 miles or 450 miles, that truck had to generate a certain amount of revenue per day. It was on us [the management team] to convey that to our customers,” which also led to conversations on how to reduce excess detention.
Today, new drivers at Nagle start with a base salary of $1,400 a week and within six months, depending on performance, can earn an increase to $1,500 a week. They can also qualify for safety and fuel-efficiency bonuses of up to $4,400 per year.
Four years on, Nagle has no regrets about his decision. “More than anything else what our drivers love most about the salary is the financial predictability,” he says, noting that the move brings his company’s pay practices more in step with other industries. “What other professional has a 20% swing in their weekly paycheck based on mileage or when the paperwork was received?”
BUILDING A BASE
In addition to rethinking pay practices, carriers have had to get creative in their recruitment strategies, particularly when it comes to millennials. “It’s been challenging bringing new blood back into the truck driving industry,” says Dave Bates, senior vice president, operations for less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL). “Seems these younger kids don’t want the manual labor-type work. … They don’t like the look of driving a truck. They’d rather have a computer-based job.”
That hasn’t stopped Thomasville, North Carolina-based ODFL from doubling down on its in-house driving training schools to refresh and grow its driver workforce. The schools draw primarily from ODFL dock workers, who, if they express an interest and are a good cultural fit, are invited to attend the school. The program consists of classroom and behind-the-wheel instruction, leading to a commercial driver’s license exam, which, if passed, enables them to join the ranks of professional LTL drivers—with a significant increase in pay.
The company currently has about 150 students in training and another 100 candidates ready to start, Bates notes. In this market, Bates has found that to acquire new drivers, “we are basically going to have to build them ourselves.” He adds that for already-experienced driver applicants, “[knowing how to] drive a truck will get you in the door for an interview; the hard part is proving you have what it takes to be an ODFL driver and that you fit our culture. That’s the most important thing to us.”
ODFL and other LTL carriers have one recruiting advantage over their truckload counterparts in that the LTL model allows drivers to be home every night and sleep in their own bed, Bates notes. Yet it is still a physically and mentally challenging job, where drivers might bump 15 to 20 customer docks a day.
Bates says ODFL’s focus has been on ensuring competitive, market-based wages, increasing about 3.5%, on average, a year since 2009, as well as sweetening other parts of the total compensation package. “We try to do something to improve the package every year,” he says, noting that in 2020 that included adding two holidays and increasing the company contribution to employee 401(k) accounts.
He added that during the initial surge of Covid-19, the work environment became that much more challenging as shippers, fearing the virus’s spread, would not let drivers enter offices or use break rooms or bathroom facilities. In some cases, wait times also became extended, with drivers having to wait in line over six hours to make deliveries to some big-box retailers.
Over the intervening months, however, instances of drivers being denied basic amenities at shippers’ docks abated. Businesses mostly worked out the kinks of their Covid safety protocols, use of personal protective equipment (PPE) became widespread, and both shippers and drivers became more comfortable with the new environment of personal hygiene, masking, social distancing, and no-touch deliveries.
IT’S STILL ABOUT THE MONEY
John Luciani, chief operating officer for LTL solutions at West Chester, Pennsylvania-based truck line A. Duie Pyle, echoes the basic point being made consistently by many trucking executives. “The industry across the board has to find ways to increase driver pay. That’s one sure thing that will attract more [people] to the industry,” he says, noting that in addition to competitive wages and benefits, Pyle also provides a career path by developing some of its own drivers through its “driving academy.”
With turnover under 10%, A. Duie Pyle considers employee engagement and retention practices a function of its culture and one of its strong suits. Yearly adjustments to its compensation package help support strong new-hire rates as well. In addition to a market-competitive annual pay increase, the company last year shortened its LTL wage progression to top pay from two years to six months. “That’s especially helped with recruiting experienced drivers that worked at other carriers and were reluctant to walk away from top scale they were earning there,” he notes.
Luciani added as well that one sometimes overlooked factor in driver retention is the type of freight you haul. “It’s an opportunity cost” as well as an employee satisfaction factor, he says. “We focus as much on what we don’t put on the truck as what we do,” he adds, noting that the freight that’s the most difficult for the driver to handle is often the costliest to service as well. It’s a “quality of the work” issue that when properly managed, can ensure higher profitability and happier drivers.
At the end of the day, higher pay, respect for their skill and perseverance, and recognizing professional drivers for their value to a working economy will tip the scales. That also means that shippers will have to do their part by partnering with their carriers to eliminate detention time that results in money-costing delays.
PAYING THE “RIGHT PRICE”
Despite carriers’ efforts, the compensation issue continues to bedevil the industry. “Driver pay is still lower than it needs to be,” observes Jeremy Reymer, president of Driver Reach, which provides recruiting and compliance software to trucking firms, noting “they only have so much capacity to earn in a given day or week.”
Satish Jindel, president of research firm SJ Consulting Group, agrees. Asked about the trucking industry’s ongoing labor challenges, Jindel says the issue isn’t a shortage of drivers; it’s an issue of an industry’s “not paying the right price” to attract qualified drivers. “No one else in our society can really understand the quality-of-life issues these warriors on the road experience every day,” he says. “Every minute they have to be alert. No other job requires that level of concentration. If the industry paid what people are willing to drive for, we wouldn’t have a shortage.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."