Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
Randy Sinker thought he had seen just about everything over his more than 30 years in the airfreight and logistics business. That was until 2020. “Unprecedented doesn’t even begin to describe it,” says Sinker, who is president of Winnsboro, Texas-based freight forwarder and third-party service provider Team Worldwide. If anything, the year reinforced for Sinker, and others in the airfreight forwarding industry, that the “f” in forwarding really stands for “flexible.”
“We found we had to have lots of patience and be very creative” in the face of unprecedented challenges, he says, referring to the market gyrations caused by the pandemic, shelter-in-place orders, and the need to ensure safe workspaces and provide adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees. Then there was the drastic reduction in commercial passenger flights (and the resulting loss of critical belly space for cargo), the surge in PPE shipments, skyrocketing rates, and the shift of cargo profiles from supporting B2B (business-to-business) needs to meeting e-commerce–driven B2C (business-to-consumer) demands.
He defined the year as a progression through three phases. In the first phase, February and March, the market still had capacity. “I recall taking a flight to JFK on March 9, and the plane was two-thirds empty,” he notes.
Then the middle phase, from mid-March through the summer and fall, saw commercial passenger lift disappear. “You’d book [cargo on] a flight, and it would be canceled,” Sinker remembers. Airlines began furloughing employees and shuttering some secondary- and tertiary-market offices. Station hours were reduced. Some experienced, long-time employees took early retirement, and with them, valuable forwarder relationships. It was a daily challenge to get reliable information as short-staffed airlines struggled to keep up.
That period coincided with surging demand for shipping personal protective equipment, mostly from Asia. Finding capacity became a huge challenge, and rates shot up “to levels we have never seen—four to five times normal, if not greater,” Sinker says.
Entering the new year, the market has somewhat stabilized into a third phase. While freight volumes are still high, the holiday crush has passed and e-commerce–related freight has come off its 2020 peak. Both all-cargo and passenger airlines have adapted, regrouped, redeployed, and adapted again—as have their freight-forwarding partners.
A STEEP LEARING CURVE
In many cases, those adaptations have involved the way airlines deploy their aircraft. “It’s been an interesting year; we’ve all learned a huge amount,” says Roger Samways, vice president of cargo, commercial for Dallas, Texas-based American Airlines Cargo. By way of background, he notes that some 50% of the world’s air cargo moves in the bellies of passenger aircraft. His company typically generates some $800 million to $1 billion in cargo revenue annually.
At American Airlines, “early on we saw a need to repurpose some of our passenger aircraft to carry cargo. That is what we’ve been doing since early March,” Samways recalls. The first such flight was Dallas to Frankfurt, Germany. Over time, that grew to some 250 flights per week, mostly between Asia, Europe, and the U.S. By late December, American was on the cusp of operating its 5,000th cargo-only flight using passenger aircraft, he said. Samways expects to operate the same number of weekly flights through the first quarter, which could change depending on how much—and how quickly—passenger traffic returns.
While American was flying passenger aircraft for all-cargo duty, the freight was being loaded only into the belly of the aircraft. Other airlines, such as Air Canada, went the extra step and removed seats from the premium and economy areas of passenger cabins so the plane could carry more cargo in addition to freight in the plane’s belly. Last year, Delta Airlines removed seats from a Boeing 777 and converted the aircraft to all-cargo use, prior to retiring its 777 fleet last October.
American decided against that strategy, says Samways, because it foresaw several challenges.
For one thing, cargo that goes in the belly of the aircraft normally is consolidated in unit load devices (ULDs), containers designed specifically to fit in a passenger plane’s lower-deck cargo area. Freight intended for the passenger cabin—whether the cabin has seats or not—would have to be boxed or in cartons that could be walked onto the aircraft. Flight attendants and, in some cases, ground crews also would have to fly with the cargo in the passenger cabin.
Another challenge was limited “slot times” at airports, particularly in Asia. Operators literally had 90 minutes on the ground. “We could not commit to loading in the passenger cabin in that short time frame,” Samways recalls. Lastly was the cost of pulling out seats—and then reinstalling them for when passenger traffic returned.
“The [past] year has not been easy,” Samways says, adding that he expects a shortage of cargo capacity to persist into 2021, with demand outstripping supply in many markets and, thereby, keeping yields near record levels. Yet 2020 “has been an incredible learning experience,” he notes. The key lesson: “We have to be nimble and adaptable.”
FINDING NEW SOLUTIONS
John Hill, president and chief commercial officer of Glen Mills, Pennsylvania-based Pilot Freight Services, recalls being stunned by the whipsawing of the market. “We went from having a brutal March to being in peak season in May,” and then operating at that pace the rest of the year. Rates for aircargo space “went crazy, peaking at about $20 a kilo from Asia to the U.S.,” he recalls.
While the pandemic upended the market in many ways, it also spotlighted companies that were creative in helping customers overcome unique challenges. Early on, “we had one of the largest health-care equipment companies come to us” for help with a pandemic-related problem, Hill notes. Normally, their field technicians would assemble, test, and certify the company’s patient-monitoring equipment on site within a hospital. Pilot traditionally supported this effort by consolidating and shipping components and parts to technicians on site.
Yet with hospital ICUs swamped with Covid patients, the company was concerned about putting its technicians at risk in an environment where the virus was so prevalent.
Hill and his team got together and came up with a solution. Instead of shipping piecemeal to hospitals, Pilot took its main New Jersey station, cordoned off an area of the facility as a “cleanroom,” and set up workstations for the technicians so they could assemble and test the patient-monitoring equipment there. As technicians finished assembling and testing the machines, Pilot then blanket-wrapped the units and expedited their delivery by dedicated truck to hospitals in Manhattan.
“We had them up and running in 24 hours to accommodate the hospital and its patients,” Hill reports. The result was a solution that significantly limited the time technicians had to spend inside the hospital—and, by extension, their risk of exposure to the virus.
TAKING ON THE VACCINE CHALLENGE
While similar stories abound, the one that captured the public’s eye last year was the logistics sector’s role in the vaccination effort. While FedEx and UPS have received, deservedly so, the lion’s share of attention for marshaling their integrated networks to provide linehaul airlift and local delivery of vaccine shipments from manufacturing plants, the freight-forwarding and all-cargo community also stepped up, providing transportation of raw materials, equipment, and other supplies for vaccine manufacture as well as medical equipment to facilitate vaccine administration.
Miami, Florida-based all-cargo carrier Amerijet International Airlines supported two areas. It moved ingredients, reagents, and other substances used in vaccine manufacturing from San Juan, Puerto Rico, into the U.S. Amerijet, which has sophisticated cold chain capabilities at its Miami station, also shipped some 250 million syringes and needles from Asia to the U.S., reports Tim Strauss, the company’s chief executive officer.
Amerijet provides scheduled and charter services with a fleet of eight wide-body Boeing 767 aircraft. The company primarily services Latin and Central America, the Caribbean, and Europe and operates dedicated charters to other worldwide points as well.
The scope and scale of vaccine distribution is a huge challenge for the airfreight industry, Strauss notes, but it’s one that he believes the industry’s collective resources, experience, and expertise are up to.
Part of that challenge lies in the amount of product that has to get to market to support global vaccination efforts. Strauss estimates that “roughly speaking, you can put about 1 million doses on a Boeing 777 freighter.” While that might sound like a lot, thousands of such flights would be needed for the current campaign. “To do half the population of the world, that would take roughly 3,500 777 loads, or 7,000 for both doses,” he explains. “That’s like 20 years of flying compressed into a very short period of time.”
For the foreseeable future, Strauss does not expect long-haul international passenger flights—the primary source of cargo capacity—to increase significantly because “passengers are not there” to support it. “Almost all the profit for passenger airlines comes from the front cabin. The back cabin is break even,” he explains. “That’s the group that has learned to work [remotely] by Zoom (video meetings). Where executives before might have traveled internationally five to six times a year, now they go [online to attend Microsoft] Teams meetings and maybe travel once a year.”
He recalls that when the SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) virus hit, it took nearly seven years for the industry to recover to previous levels of flights and cargo capacity. He thinks the recovery from Covid-19 will be faster than with SARS, yet he does not foresee a meaningful recovery of commercial lift from international passenger flights until 2022 or 2023.
STEPPING UP TO THE PLATE
In the meantime, airfreight players continue to keep supply lines open despite significant operating constraints. “What I’ve been most impressed with is the [airfreight forwarding] industry’s ability to step up to the plate … especially in the face of one of the biggest challenges we’ve ever had,” with the grounding of some 50% of passenger flights, notes Brandon Fried, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based Airforwarders Association, which represents 275 member companies, including airlines, forwarders, and all-cargo carriers.
“It has been a team effort … this big symphony of stakeholders working together” to make possible the rapid and efficient movement of millions of shipments of essential health-care, medical, and pharmaceutical supplies; protective equipment; and other critical consumer goods, he notes.
As for what lies ahead, more than anything else, progress administering the vaccine—and how quickly that restores consumer confidence—will drive the pace of recovery, Fried believes. “We are never going to see [a return to] the traditional normal of the past,” he says, because “people will be wondering if the next pandemic is around the corner and whether we’re ready for it.”
He expects mask wearing and social distancing to continue for some time to come, and pandemic-driven alterations to many workplace and business practices to become permanent. “We might not go into the office as much—maybe only two, three times a week.”
Fried also cites the pandemic-induced shift in consumer buying behavior. “People [have come to] like buying things online, getting boxes delivered directly to their doorsteps,” he notes, all of which has fundamentally changed shopping habits, supply chain flows, and distribution demands in ways that will likely endure after the pandemic subsides.
Yet some old habits die hard, he says. Fried predicts that as the pandemic begins to ease, consumer confidence returns, and the economy responds, “then we’ll see more people willing to get on airplanes and fly.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."