David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
If there’s one thing 2020 taught us, it’s the dangers of prognostication. Last year at this time, preparing a solid market forecast seemed like a slam-dunk: The economy was humming along, unemployment stood at record lows, and all indications were we could expect more of the same. Then, Covid-19 hit the U.S. economy like a wrecking ball, shuttering businesses, sending unemployment to new heights, and generally making hash of those expectations.
So what does all this mean for 2021? Is there any way to tell? Will the economy stabilize? Will the employment picture improve? And what does the turmoil of the past year portend for the logistics supply chain sector?
We didn’t have to look far to find someone who could weigh in on those questions—particularly those that relate to the supply chain. Our own Gary Master, publisher of DC Velocity and COO of Agile Business Media, has an extensive background in business economics along with 30-plus years’ experience in supply chain logistics. As an executive at a media company focused on the supply chain, he keeps close tabs on the market in general and the supply chain logistics market in particular. On top of that, he tracks general economic and supply chain trends along with developments in the retail and manufacturing sectors—which, taken together, he says, give you a good picture of what’s going on.
As 2020 drew to a close, Editorial Director David Maloney sat down with Gary to get his take on what lies ahead—where the markets are heading, the trends taking shape in warehouse design, and how the pandemic will reshape supply chain operations.
Q: Obviously, 2020 was a roller coaster year for nearly every facet of the supply chain. As we begin 2021, what are your overall impressions looking forward?
A: I think it helps to take a quick look back at 2020 in order to understand where we are with 2021. 2020 brought the strongest economic shocks you could possibly have. In the second quarter, we had the single greatest percentage drop in GDP (gross domestic product) year over year, quarter over quarter, ever. And then in the third quarter, we had the greatest rise in GDP ever. So, it was just a remarkable year from an economic standpoint, when you look at that wide variance.
Now, as we enter 2021 with the shock and awe behind us, we are trying to figure out where we go from here. I think that when you look at 2021, you’ve got acceleration of certain industries, you have the new administration in Washington, and you have the vaccines that give us all hope. Vaccinations are going to help boost economic growth and activity in 2021.
Q: Where do you see the material handling market heading this year?
A: I think you are going to see a steady continuation of activity. Despite the conditions in 2020, we had hot areas, such as food and grocery delivery. We had micro fulfillment making inroads. We had the e-commerce boom and escalating demand for last-mile delivery service. All those things are going to continue to be hot in 2021. Covid has just accelerated the growth of those areas.
Q: There’s also a lot of pent-up demand with projects that were put on hold in 2020. Companies have the cash but have been afraid to spend it during the pandemic. Do you foresee a loosening of those purse strings?
A: That is a great question. The answer is yes and no. Will vaccinations and rising business confidence help shake some of those projects loose? The answer is yes. We have already seen several major projects—some involving the construction of massive distribution centers—getting approved and going forward. That’s the positive side.
On the negative side, you’ve got some companies that, with Covid-related expenses, with economic uncertainty, and with a downturn in business, are now a bit cash-strapped. So, they are caught between the need to make changes and a lack of cash to make those changes.
Even so, I think you are going to see some companies really step it up and launch major projects. Others are going to be more cautious because of their cash position. Overall, the economic fundamentals are good—with the exception of unemployment, which is way too high.
Q: Do you think that once we get through the current wave of Covid cases, the unemployment rate will drop, especially as vaccinations become more widely available?
A: Yes, that is the assumption most people are making right now. Despite the surge in cases this winter, the vaccines’ arrival gives us hope that we can get the pandemic under control and return to a normal way of life. Could you imagine that? A normal way of life, Dave? Sitting on an airplane without a mask. Going to an actual—not virtual—event? Wouldn’t that be a wonderful world?
Q: It certainly would be. So much of economics is based on trust and confidence. What has to happen in 2021 to rebuild consumer confidence and nudge us back toward normalcy?
A: I think there are a couple of things. The number-one critical component is getting more vaccines approved and more people vaccinated. I think once we see immunization rates begin to rise and hear that it’s starting to take hold, that gives us hope. And then you start thinking about being able to travel again and going on vacation. You start thinking about being able to go to gatherings and events. That builds confidence and trust. From an economic standpoint, that is a really, really good thing. So, I think getting people vaccinated is number one.
I think number two is what happens in Washington. A government held in check by both parties is good for the economy, as it keeps that government on a more centrist course. Economically, it’s good for businesses when there’s little risk of the government making a radical right or left turn. They are able to plan based on normal growth trends and economic conditions. I think those are two things that are particularly critical right now in gaining the trust of the consumer and the business community.
Q: You mentioned the high unemployment rate. How will this affect our supply chains going forward?
A: Before 2020, all we talked about was labor shortages, labor shortages, labor shortages. Now, we’re in a situation where upwards of 20 million people are unemployed. It might seem that we could solve all of our problems by simply taking those unemployed individuals and putting them to work in the material handling sector. But it is not as easy as it sounds.
The other thing is, it is a risk. Human workers get sick and can’t be counted on during a pandemic, when they could be quarantined or sidelined by illness for some time. So, even though we have a high unemployment rate, we still have a business environment that is risk-averse. That means there is now an even greater need for automation to take that labor risk out of your business.
I think you are going to continue to see robotics grow. We keep hearing how companies are looking to employ robots in any way they can throughout their operations—from manufacturing to warehousing and distribution, where they perform picking, packing, put-away, and truck-loading tasks. Everybody is looking at anything that can be done with robotics.
The pandemic has also underscored the need for flexibility. We don’t know what is going to happen in the future or even tomorrow. Everybody is looking to add flexibility to their operations. Robotics and automated solutions create flexibility.
Q: Labor concerns could also have repercussions for facility design. After the Great Recession, we saw companies make design changes aimed at reducing their reliance on labor, as they were cautious about increasing headcount even when conditions improved. I think we can expect this pandemic to have a similar effect on the way companies design facilities.
A: That is a great point, Dave. It is the pendulum effect, right? I think right now, a lot of folks are looking at labor usage within their facilities and how they can reduce their staffing needs. It is a cost issue, but it’s also about efficiency, accuracy, and reducing their exposure to risk.
Q: Transportation also had a long, strange ride in 2020, with business nearly falling off a cliff in the middle of the year before rebounding in the fall to record-breaking levels. What do you see ahead for transportation as we begin 2021?
A: I think you hit the nail on the head. When you look at utilization, rates, and everything else across the board in transportation, it’s been a very weird year. With all the consolidation we’ve had within transportation, we lost a lot of capacity, which left the market susceptible to shortages.
I am hoping that when the new administration starts to look at economic stimulus and spending, it will consider the needs of our nation’s infrastructure. I think that if we move forward with infrastructure projects and make needed repairs quickly, it will make the transportation sector more efficient.
I am also really concerned about shipping rates, especially the “Amazon effect” and consumers’ expectation of free shipping. That’s been going on for some time now, but it just puts pressure on what companies can charge for shipping and threatens their profitability. We just really need innovation on the transportation side.
Then, lastly, there’s the matter of helping individuals understand that transportation could be a great career opportunity. I mean that from the truck driver on up. Getting more trucks on the road, getting more individuals to see driving as a viable career path—I think both of those are critical to bolstering the transportation segment.
Q: Are there things we can do to make our supply chains more efficient?
A: I think the pandemic has demonstrated the risks of global sourcing and the need to find sources closer to home. We easily fall into the old trap of cost, while risk avoidance falls down the ladder. I hope that we as a global society have learned our lesson and that we are really thinking about creating a truly resilient supply chain.
Overall, I think we can feel good about 2021 with the vaccinations coming. We will see a 3.0% to 3.5% increase in business overall next year and maybe 2.8% to 3.5% year-over-year growth in GDP. I also think that we will see across-the-board growth in the material handling industry, with certain segments—like robotics, automation, software, and services—doing particularly well. I think you are going to see a good strong year in those areas, so I am excited about 2021. Quite frankly, I am glad to see 2020 leave.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."