How has the pandemic affected businesses in general and supply chains in particular? Dr. Yossi Sheffi, a professor at MIT, offers some answers in his latest book.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
It's been nearly 10 months since Covid-19 slammed into the global economy like a wrecking ball. And while businesses have learned to manage, many will endure lasting effects that may take years to resolve. In the meantime, all of us—businesses and consumers alike—are yearning for things to get back to normal.
But what does that even mean? Is it possible that we may someday return to some semblance of our old lives? Or will we enter a "new normal"? And if so, what will that look like?
These are some of the questions Dr. Yossi Sheffi takes on in his latest book, The New (Ab)Normal: Reshaping Business and Supply Chain Strategy Beyond Covid-19. In the book, Sheffi, a professor of engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and director of the school's Center for Transportation and Logistics, explains how the Covid-19 pandemic has affected businesses and society, and talks about the critical role that supply chains have played in helping people, governments, and companies manage the crisis. He also examines what our post-pandemic world might look like.
Sheffi recently talked to DC Velocity Editorial Director David Maloney about the book and his thoughts on how the pandemic will reshape our supply chains.
Q: Your new book takes a look at the pandemic's effects on the economy in general and supply chains in particular. What did your research reveal? A: I found that both good and bad things are happening. For some companies, business is up, and for others, it has virtually disappeared. The whole tourism industry and the airlines are in bad shape, for example.
But let's talk about supply chain in particular. Some of the "good" things that have come out of it can be summed up with the question that everybody asks my wife, which is "What does your husband do?" Until January of this year, when she told them "My husband is in supply chain," they just gave her that baffled, "deer in the headlights" look. Now, everybody nods and says "Oh, I know about that. So he is working on important things."
So, almost overnight, the whole profession became a household name. The importance of supply chain has been elevated. People and CEOs understand that this is the stuff that connects supply and demand. This is what makes the world work. That is something, I think, that will have profound consequences going forward.
Q: The pandemic has disrupted every business. How have successful companies managed their operations during these very difficult times? A: There are several things that successful businesses are doing. For instance, they've established emergency management centers where all of the information comes through a set group of people who are the decision-makers. It used to be a room, but now it is, of course, virtual.
They also have reviewed their suppliers to make sure that they're still around and are open. And they've reviewed products and customers. You may not have enough parts or raw material to build all of the product you need to build. You may not have enough to serve all of your customers. Which supplier and which customer should you focus on?
They also think about finance. Of course, we are going through a recession and cash is king, but businesses need to be very careful about extending terms of payment to suppliers. Companies have also been reducing SKUs (stock-keeping units). General Mills, for example, cut its Progresso soup lineup from 90 varieties to 50. This was initially done in order to assure supply. Now, it's being done to hold down costs because fewer varieties mean fewer changeovers in manufacturing.
Then the good companies never let a good crisis go to waste. They are planning for recovery. They are strategically looking at all their customers, all their employees, and all their business lines. What works and what doesn't, and what will be working in the future?
Finally, something that is really unique to this crisis is that a lot of companies are significantly accelerating their adoption of advanced tech. Whether it is connectivity or visibility or going through the cloud, companies are adopting optimization systems at a much higher rate than before.
Q: Did you find that the pandemic had accelerated the adoption of automated equipment and other advanced technologies in warehouse and distribution facilities? A: Absolutely. Warehouse automation is accelerating rapidly, though the trend lines can be hard to decipher because, at the same time, companies like Amazon or Walmart.com are hiring a lot of people in response to the e-commerce boom. It is not only them; it is Target and Lowe's and JD.com and Alibaba—everybody is seeing online sales explode. But at the same time, they are certainly building a lot of new automated warehouses.
Of course, we're also reading about developments in transportation automation, like autonomous trucks, autonomous last-mile delivery. Many companies are developing these capabilities. There is even a company that is now seeking FAA approval to deliver human parts between hospitals via drones. And these are not small packages; they are 150-pound packages and the drones are actually small airplanes. People are moving all over the place when it comes to automation.
Q: Can you share some examples of companies that have successfully adapted to the new business environment? A: We've seen a number of big companies adjusting, but I also have some examples of small, family-owned companies that have adapted to the times. One of those is a husband-and-wife company with 20 trucks that, prior to the pandemic, supplied food to institutions—universities, restaurants, and industrial parks—in the Boston area.
In March 2020, their business dropped 96%. So they turned on a dime and began marketing to consumers. Now, keep in mind that we're talking about people who never had a website, never took an order online, so this required a big adjustment on their part. But they quickly began stepping up their marketing and ordering capabilities. At first, they would just send out a PDF listing what they had available for sale. Then it became a website, though you still had to call if you wanted to order something you saw online. Then they put pictures on the website that customers could click to order. Then they added tracking and tracing capabilities. All of this happened in only about three to four weeks. They moved from being strictly a wholesaler to what was essentially a modern online retail operation. Now, of course, small companies can move on a dime. Still, many of their competitors failed, while they moved forward very quickly. So it was interesting to see.
Q: What are some of the attributes of companies that will make it through the crisis versus those that won't? A: Well, think about the people who are most at risk of becoming seriously ill or dying. It is the weak, the people with pre-existing conditions or co-morbidities, people whose health was already compromised.
It's the same thing with companies. The ones most at risk are the weak, the ones that were already in trouble before the pandemic. An example would be U.S. department stores. Department store revenues had slipped from something like $30 billion in 1999 to $11 billion by 2019, so they had lost two-thirds of their revenue in 20 years' time. When the pandemic hit, a number of major department stores went bankrupt. It is the companies that were weak before who have not made it.
It is not the fast who survive, it is the people who can adapt. But in order to be able to adapt, you need some financial muscle, some reserve of money and talent, and the companies that were in trouble before didn't have that. It is the companies who had the talent, who were in reasonably good shape, and who could pivot that survived.
Q: So, what is our "new abnormal" and what are some of the key supply chain lessons we've learned during these pandemic times? A: When we talk about the new abnormal, people are talking about the recovery being a V-, a U-, an L-, or a W-shaped recovery. But no, it will be none of the above. The recovery is going to be like a game of Whack-a-Mole, where a rodent pops up randomly on the play board and you have to hit it quickly. Think about the globe as your play board, where the pandemic flares up randomly in different locations, causing business shutdowns and halting your suppliers' operations. That is what we are facing, which is very difficult for supply chain managers.
By the way, the media are talking about the end of China and the end of just-in-time. All of this is just not going to happen, because moving back to the United States or to Europe goes against resilience. In order to be resilient in a world like this, you need to be global. You cannot consolidate your supply base in a single part of the world—even if it's the United States or somewhere in Europe—because that region could close with no warning. You need to be spread all over the world. You need to have factories and suppliers in more than one place.
This is only one aspect of what the world is going to look like over the next year or maybe a little longer, depending on the efficacy of the vaccines that are developed. We just don't know if these vaccines are going to be like the flu shot, which is only 60% to 70% effective, or if they will be high 90s, because a lot of the vaccines are based on new technology that we've never tried before. So, we just don't know. Clearly, for the next year at least, if not more, it will be a Whack-a-Mole recovery.
Q: To close, you suggest in your book that there may be a new "Roaring '20s." What do you see for the future, and what opportunities will there be for supply chain managers? A: Supply chain management is becoming the new finance, the new marketing—a sexy profession that people are going to flock to. At MIT, we're seeing applications for our supply chain management program go through the roof, and other schools report the same thing. The word is out, so to speak.
We had the Roaring '20s after World War I. And we had some of the best growth the U.S. has ever seen after World War II. This is almost like a war. This is something that affects the entire world, and I think people will come out of this with a realization that the world is a lot more vulnerable than they thought. I hope so.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."