When the pandemic hit, e-commerce exploded, flooding parcel networks with record volumes that have yet to ease. With carrier capacity already maxed out, what can shippers expect for the holiday peak season?
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
Last March and April, parcel express carriers got a temporary reprieve. Volumes declined as the pandemic closed businesses, consumers sheltered in place, and those who could started working from home. Traditional business-to-business supply chain channels in which parcel shipments flowed from suppliers to retailers dried up. Canceled sailings sank ship calls into U.S. ports, driving double-digit declines in imports.
Yet consumers still had pantries to fill and refrigerators to stock, toilet paper and other essential goods to buy, prescriptions to refill, and back yards to be spruced up—not to mention a variety of home-improvement projects on their to-do lists.
And with that, consumers went online with a vengeance. Parcel carriers had barely caught their breath when May, June, and July saw e-commerce explode, residential parcel deliveries ramp up to record levels, network capacity quickly become constrained, and an early, pandemic-induced peak season emerge through the summer and into the fall.
“It is the best [market for parcel carriers] I have seen in 30 years,” observes Satish Jindel, president of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania-based ShipMatrix Inc., a subsidiary of Jindel’s SJ Consulting Group that helps shippers leverage shipping technology and data to reduce parcel-shipping costs and improve service. “It’s firing on all cylinders. [Parcel carriers] can tell the customer ‘Take it or leave it. … I just don’t have the capacity to handle [more volume].’”
The pandemic-induced e-commerce surge “has pushed carrier capacity to the brink,” says Meg Duncan, director of strategic sourcing for third-party logistics service provider (3PL) Koch Logistics, based in Minneapolis. “And it’s not letting up.” She notes that one of her parcel carriers was hiring 500 drivers a week in the Los Angeles market just to keep up. “In certain markets, [parcel carriers] are just under water. It’s kind of like the Wild West.”
Duncan’s company provides businesses with logistics planning and transportation management services supporting store operations, such as buildouts and remodels. When the pandemic hit, a lot of that work was put on hold. As businesses brought projects back online, the timing coincided with the surge in consumer e-commerce activity. The result was an almost immediate capacity crisis in the parcel and even traditional freight markets.
RISING DEMAND PUSHES UP COSTS
And it’s all exacerbated by Amazon’s continued emphasis on free shipping to Prime customers. “Freight is not free,” observes Duncan, who adds that consumers should find a balance between online ordering and keeping local businesses a viable choice. “Once we get through this, do people go back to their traditional shopping patterns with local stores?” she asks. “If not, what does that mean for freight and shipping [capacity]?”
Amazon certainly is not standing still and is taking matters more and more into its own hands to ensure it has sufficient delivery capacity to prevent delays. It’s been reported that the company is initially establishing some 1,000 new, smaller delivery hubs in cities across the nation, designed to cut the last-mile “stem time” (the time that elapses from when a driver leaves the terminal until the driver makes the first delivery) by placing hubs closer to suburban delivery points. Those hubs could grow to as many as 1,500. The strategy also provides more support infrastructure for Amazon’s continued push into same-day delivery for Prime customers.
One fact is unequivocal: Parcel shipping costs are going up. UPS, FedEx, and the U.S. Postal Service all have announced rate increases and early-season, pandemic-induced surcharges—which took effect during the summer ahead of the traditional peak season. In some cases, additional surcharges for large-volume shippers have been imposed as well. And some markets have become so capacity constrained that the major parcel carriers are not taking new business or accepting additional volume that’s outside of capacity contractually promised to a shipper.
It’s a convergence of surging pandemic-induced e-commerce ordering coupled with traditional peak season volumes, collectively driving a “super peak” of parcel volume and costs. And still to come is the impact of already-announced Jan. 1 rate increases.
BRACING FOR THE “SUPER PEAK”
The industry is navigating through unprecedented times, notes Ryan Kelly, vice president of global e-commerce marketing for FedEx. “The growth we expected … over the next several years” has happened in a matter of months, he says of the surge in e-commerce–driven parcels. “We’ve been seeing peak-level volumes since March, and we expect that to continue” through the peak holiday season. “It will be unlike any peak we have seen in our company’s history,” he says.
Among the initiatives Kelly says FedEx has implemented to help manage the surge and maintain service consistency has been continued investment in technology at multiple levels, going to seven-day-a-week residential deliveries, building out and optimizing capacity in FedEx Ground’s network and field operations, and having FedEx Ground do last-mile day-definite delivery of certain residential FedEx Express packages.
It’s a time when shippers are challenged as never before to plan effectively, negotiate smartly, secure capacity in advance, and do all they can to mitigate an ever-increasing shipping-cost hit to the bottom line—while making sure goods get delivered.
“My advice to shippers is to leverage a 3PL that can position your products in multiple markets and ensure your inventory is accessible from multiple ship points,” recommends Ryan Singerline, senior director of customer logistics for Miami-based Ryder. Singerline adds that, with e-commerce fulfillment centers in Pennsylvania, Texas, and California, Ryder has “the ability to reach 99% of the U.S. within two days.”
MOVING TARGET
At the same time, it’s becoming clear that the market itself is in flux. A survey done by UPS subsidiary Ware2Go helps to illustrate the evolving market. The study, which was conducted among 250 merchants in August, found that 77% had changed their selling strategies in response to Covid-19, with 35% launching an online store for the first time. That shift to direct-to-consumer e-commerce channels also had repercussions for respondents’ order fulfillment operations, leading many to expand their delivery options, the study showed. Among the findings:
25% changed their mix and started selling new products
22% opened a new sales channel
56% saw an increase in new customers over the past six months
56% began offering no-contact delivery
34% added two-day shipping guarantees.
“The current situation requires merchants to prepare for a holiday season where historical trends are not as relevant,” Steve Denton, Ware2Go’s chief executive officer, said in a statement announcing the survey results. “Today’s market … requires merchants to leverage a flexible supply chain as a strategic asset for commerce.”
Josh Dinneen is senior vice president at Vienna, Virginia-based LaserShip, which provides primarily e-commerce residential parcel delivery services, operating a network of 60 service locations and four hubs covering 20 states across the Eastern Seaboard and through the Midwest. He notes that an interesting finding from a LaserShip survey of 1,000 consumers was the rapid uptake of e-commerce among baby boomers, nearly half (47%) of whom plan to continue their online buying after the pandemic. Dinneen cites that as a clear indication that the move from “offline to online channels certainly will stay. It’s sustainable,” he says.
Dinneen cautions, however, that “the holiday season will be tough … nothing like we have ever seen before.” He believes the current capacity constraints in the parcel market are enduring and will take 12 months to flush out.
Some shippers, he says, didn’t anticipate the capacity crunch and are now scrambling for capacity at any cost. “I had a good-sized brick-and-mortar retailer contact me [recently],” he recalls. “He asked if we had capacity for November and December. Unfortunately, my response was ‘Sorry, we do not.’ He then asked, ‘Was there any amount of money that would change that—tell me what I have to pay.’ He was dead serious.” Dinneen has been telling new customers that they can reserve now, but LaserShip will not be able to bring them on board until January.
BEYOND PARCEL CARRIERS
The capacity crunch is driving retailers to explore alternatives to traditional parcel carriers. Some retailers are more aggressively promoting their BOPIS (buy online/pick up in store) services as a kind of self-serve delivery. That’s an option for consumers who live or work in close proximity to a brick-and-mortar store, where the order is filled locally and staged for pickup. Retailers are encouraging this by offering discounts on future purchases.
It’s also been a boon to “crowdsourced” delivery firms—those who sign up people part-time to make parcel deliveries. One of the more established players in this field is same-day delivery provider Roadie, based in Atlanta. Roadie’s “on the way” model taps drivers already on the road in their personal vehicles and diverts them to a nearby store for pickup. The drivers typically deliver orders within hours.
Roadie’s use by retailers has surged with the pandemic. From February through April, Roadie’s large retail customers saw increases in weekly same-day deliveries ranging from 151% to 1,456%. In that same period, the number of new store locations launching Roadie’s same-day service went up by anywhere from 110% to 365%. One client, Tractor Supply Co., in 30 days went from piloting Roadie at 400 stores to a full nationwide rollout across the home-improvement retailer’s entire network of 1,863 stores.
“The environment just gets more and more unusual,” notes Marc Gorlin, chief executive officer of Roadie, which counts among its customers The Home Depot, Advance Auto Parts, Nothing Bundt Cakes, and Delta Airlines. “As demand rises, parcel networks have to tack on surcharges and price hikes to prioritize demand. It’s a story that plays out every peak season, and the pandemic brought it on early this year.”
As long as shippers look to large parcel carriers’ fixed-asset solution, it’s a scenario that inevitably will repeat itself, he believes. Roadie’s “on-the-way” driver fleet, by contrast, “flexes dynamically based on the needs of the customer. By tapping into resources already on the road, we embrace a just-in-time delivery model that has the same or better reliability and speed than fixed-asset networks,” Gorlin explains.
The strategies that enabled businesses to stay above water during the pandemic “are going to strengthen and position them for success” through 2020 and into the new year, he believes. “Consumers are a long way from returning to their previous shopping habits, if they ever do,” Gorlin concludes. “Once you know how easy it is to get something delivered, why risk the store?”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."