John H. Boyd is Founder and Principal of The Boyd Co., Inc. Founded in 1975 in Princeton, NJ, the firm provides independent site selection counsel to leading U.S. and overseas corporations. Organizations served by John over the years are many and varied and include The World Bank, The Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), The Aerospace Industries Association (AIA), MIT’s groundbreaking Work of the Future Project, UPS, Canada's Privy Council and most recently, the President’s National Economic Council providing insights on policies to reduce supply chain bottlenecks.
COVID-19 has hit supply chains with a “double whammy.” It’s not just that supply of vital medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, and essential consumer staples has crashed. Companies have also seen a plunge in demand as more than 30 million workers lost their jobs and shelter-in-place rules halted normal commerce. Meanwhile the already booming e-commerce sector has kicked into overdrive.
How will these large and rapid changes impact the distribution warehousing sector here in the United States? From my vantage point as a corporate site selection consultant, I have identified some of the key trends that I see having an impact on site locations and design decisions.
Move toward reshoring
Reshoring of manufacturing and supply chain operations from China back to the U.S. has been a trend since the Trump tax cuts, but we expect the pace of this supply chain realignment to pick up even more now. The pandemic has brought into the spotlight the fact that our nation’s supply chains have been stretched to the limit at our great peril. COVID-19 has been a painful wakeup call that our supply chains—normally hidden from public view—are far too reliant on distant nations like China. The message of supply chain risk has even reached the halls of the U.S. Congress where lawmakers—on both sides of the aisle—are crafting legislation to encourage American companies to shift supply chain operations from China back to the U.S. through the use of tax breaks, generous subsidies, and new rules of the road.
As a result, we expect that warehouse site selection within the U.S. will become less “port centric” and more oriented to the dynamics of domestic production and consumption. In recent years, some of the most popular and expensive supply chain real estate has been close to deep-water container ports like Miami, Florida; New York/New Jersey; Southern California; and Houston, Texas. We see that interest moderating and predict a heightened interest in warehouse sites near centers of U.S. manufacturing and agricultural production, especially in our nation’s central region.
Weakened economy
Interest in keeping a close eye on cost efficiencies and operating costs will intensify in the weakened COVID-19 economy. As a result, companies may favor lower-cost cities and states with more favorable tax regimes for their supply chain facilities. Figure 1 lists ten top locations on the U.S. East Coast for a cold chain distribution center serving the pharmaceutical industry and shows the comparative operating costs (labor, real estate, construction, power, taxes, and shipping) for a 175,000-square-foot facility. Annual costs range from a high of $27.5 million in Staten Island, New York, to a low of $18.1 million in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. The cost differential between the New York location (a state with a corporate income tax rate of 6.5%) and North Carolina (a state with the nation’s lowest corporate income tax rate at 2.5%) is $9.4 million, a significant differential of 34.2%.
[Figure1] Distribution center operating cost comparisons
Enlarge this image
Also shown in Figure 1 are ten top Central U.S. DC sites along with annual operating costs for a 750,000-square-foot national warehouse. Annual costs range from a high of $20.1 million in Humble, Texas, to a low of $18.1 million in Liberty, Missouri. Three of the ten top national DC sites are in Missouri which records the lowest corporate income tax rate in the Central U.S. and the second lowest in the nation at 4.0%.
Site-seeking companies need to be on guard for major tax hikes and toll increases in the months ahead. Those states hardest hit by COVID-19 will face unprecedented budget challenges and will be searching for new revenue sources. California, for example, is gearing up for a large property-tax hike. The state’s November ballot initiative would effectively exclude commercial and industrial properties from the landmark Proposition 13 passed in 1978 that limited property taxes for homes, businesses, and all other land to 1% of the property's value at the time it was last sold. If passed, this game-changing initiative is expected to hike property taxes for California businesses by as much as $12 billion.
At the same time, the weakened economy may also open up new sources for distribution sites. Some of the nation’s most attractive commercial real estate will be the many millions of square feet of retail space that will not be coming back after COVID-19. Developers will be especially quick to repurpose former malls and “big box” stores. These sites may prove attractive to developers due to their low cost, highway access, and truck and employee parking accommodations.
The role of risk management
Conventional risk management has always been part of the warehousing location decision. Companies have long taken into account such considerations as the integrity of the physical site, insulation from natural disasters, and political stability when choosing where to locate a warehouse or distribution center. The pandemic, however, will greatly expand the boundaries of risk management and its role in site selection. It will now need to include a range of COVID-related considerations like transitioning to new suppliers and/or customers as well as transitioning away from some that may go out of business due to COVID. Similarly, DC design and management will need to consider a myriad of human resourcefactors related to the impact of the virus on the DC’s workforce and local labor market as a whole.
Rising importance of the cold chain
COVID-19 will change not only where warehouses and DCs are located but also how they are designed. Cold storage was already on track to become a much larger player in the supply chain before COVID-19. Now, we are seeing unprecedented interest in the cold chain from investors and site-seeking industries like pharmaceutical and food. Our firm’s BizCosts unit forecasts that between 100 million and 125 million square feet of freezer/cooler space will be required to meet new demands, much of it coming from pharmaceutical, biotech, and food processing companies.
This trend is expected to continue beyond COVD-19. We expect to see many consumers continue to order perishables, including frozen food, online. Additionally, pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms are developing a wide range of new products that rely on cold storage throughout the entire supply chain. Biologics—drugs and medicines developed from living organisms—are also driving new cold storage demands. The cold chain will become even more critical when the much anticipated COVID-19 vaccine is developed, and the pharmaceutical supply chain has to handle distribution of an unprecedented number of dosages.
Technology and connectivity
COVID-19 is also causing a spike in warehouse automation. Some companies are turning to robots to help maintain social distancing and keep workers safe within the warehouse setting. Fetch Robotics, a provider of warehouse robotics, reported that inquiries are up by two-thirds since the emergence of COVID-19. Walmart says that concerns about worker safety are driving its dealings with Bossa Nova Robotics, which is designing a new shelf-scanning robot for the mega-retailer’s warehouses and stores.
Greater use of robotics will also be encouraged by the COVID-19-driven reshoring of manufacturing and supply chain facilities back to the U.S. This type of automation will help companies offset higher U.S. operating costs, principally in the area of labor.
COVID-19 has also accelerated the trend toward remote working, which will have a significant impact on the U.S. commercial real estate industry. As more employees work from home, the demand for office space decreases. When we started our firm in the 1970s, many U.S. offices averaged 500 square feet per worker. That number dropped down to 200 square feet per worker a decade ago and is now less than 150 square feet per worker. For warehousing projects, we expect to see less space allocated to other back office functions (such as accounting, sales, and customers service) that may be co-located at the site.
Rewriting the script
It’s important to remember that no one saw this coming. There’s been no script for supply chain players to follow when it comes to reacting to and dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead supply chain companies and their consultants have been writing a new script each and every day.
Given the industry’s ability to adapt quickly to changes, I have no doubt we will recover from this horrible event with a more secure and resilient supply chain in tune with the “new normal.” … What that “new normal” is, however, still remains to be determined.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."