Better together: Tech developers join forces to build a better freight-booking process
Software developers are increasingly integrating their transportation management systems with digital freight-matching apps. That could be good news for shippers and smaller truckers.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
Freight markets have been roiled by the pandemic-driven recession in recent months, adding to long-term challenges like wide swings in capacity, driver shortages, and thin profit margins. But amid that turbulence, logistics software providers say they may have found a way to capture new efficiencies by integrating their transportation management system (TMS) platforms with digital freight-matching (DFM) apps.
The two software tools take different approaches to addressing those pain points, with TMS products offering a centralized hub of information, while DFM apps use a distributed web of smartphones to match shippers in need of freight service with truckers that can provide it. But the combination of the two can tap into the best of both worlds, according to several logistics technology vendors who have recently built such integrations.
TMS software, of course, has been around for decades, enabling shippers and third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) to find carriers and book loads. But the technology has never been more important than it is today, when users are increasingly relying on their TMS tools to reduce costs; improve internal productivity, efficiency, and customer service; increase visibility; and make better use of capacity, according to the research and analyst firm Gartner. Those factors are set to drive global spending on TMS applications to $1.94 billion by 2022, Gartner says.
In contrast, DFM mobile apps have emerged over the past five years, fueled by venture capital investment and the emergence of the smartphones now found in nearly every trucker’s pocket. Their premise is that matching carriers with shippers can be done more efficiently with artificial intelligence (AI) and digital networks than by human freight brokers relying on emails and phone calls.
CREATING A ‘ONE-STOP SHOP’
Now, in the latest iteration of freight technology tools, TMS and DFM providers are joining forces by building bridges between their platforms, saying they can speed up the contracting process by exchanging data instantaneously, thus creating marketplaces where shippers and carriers can find their perfect match.
“It’s about connecting the communities of carriers and shippers, both for contracted rates and for spot rates when you need additional capacity,” says Dave Lemont, vice president and general manager at Kuebix, a TMS vendor that announced in June it had integrated its software with DFM firm Loadsmart’s freight platform. As part of their collaboration, the developers created an application programming interface (API) that automatically provides live Loadsmart freight rates to any Kuebix user looking for a truckload spot quote.
Kuebix says the deal benefits its current customers by making its platform more of a “one-stop shop.” “Customers really want one place to manage all of their freight, [whether] they’re doing less-than-truckload (LTL), full truckload, international, or parcel. We don’t want to make people learn a second interface and print out reports from a second source. That’s why travelers go to Expedia to book plane tickets instead of visiting the American Airlines site only,” Lemont says.
The combined approach also helps the digital freight-matching providers, he adds. “DFMs have been approaching the TMS providers because capacity doesn’t do you any good without a shipper, and who has the shippers with loads to move? They want access to TMS platforms’ customers,” he says. “The fewer middlemen in the world, the better.”
Costa Mesa, California-based TMS vendor Teknowlogi shares a similar vision of a streamlined freight-matching process, citing that goal as one of the reasons it expanded its collaboration with the DFM firm Trucker Tools in February. The arrangement will provide Teknowlogi’s TMS customers with an improved predictive freight-matching and -booking process, let them secure available truck capacity faster, and “improve engagement” with truckload service providers, the firms said at the time.
“People look to our TMS because they are trying to get a lane covered as fast as possible [and do it] without leaving the TMS,” says Sean McGillicuddy, marketing director for Teknowlogi.
Historically, that task has been relatively simple in the LTL sector, which is dominated by a few large players such as FedEx Corp., UPS Inc., Estes Express Lines, Old Dominion Freight Line, and XPO Logistics Inc., McGillicuddy says. Those large carriers have the resources to build their own software and connect it to TMS platforms with the help of specialized software engineers. However, freight booking is much harder for shippers seeking capacity in the truckload sector, where as many as 90% of trucks belong to fleets of 10 or fewer vehicles, McGillicuddy says. That fragmented market makes it challenging to find carriers, commit to rates, and track loads.
By striking deals with DFM providers whose software apps have been downloaded by thousands of individual drivers, TMS vendors can instantly expand their customers’ access to those small fleets. “As these apps get more and more sophisticated, trucking companies’ adoption of them makes it possible for them to keep up with where the industry’s going, which is automation, shipment visibility, and AI,” McGillicuddy says.
Digital transformation initiatives have accelerated over the last few months, as shippers embrace flexible operations to keep up with shifting demand, Blue Yonder said in a press release announcing the partnership. The move ensures that shippers can tap into real-time services and a reliable capacity network, using a dynamic “pricing discovery” solution to obtain instant price quotes and book loads up to two weeks in advance, the company said at the time.
According to Blue Yonder, shippers and 3PLs often complain about the manually intensive freight-booking process. Offering access to carrier marketplaces—another term for DFM apps—can streamline the process by providing live rates and real-time capacity information at the outset, instead of forcing users to go through the usual routine of contacting their primary carriers, then defaulting to their backup carriers, and finally resorting to the expensive spot market.
That improved procedure can be particularly valuable for smaller shippers that lack the resources that are available to their larger competitors, says Keith Whalen, vice president of product management at Blue Yonder.
“We have a wide variety of shippers and 3PLs, ranging from large manufacturers and retailers and some of largest 3PLs around the globe, to shippers that don’t necessarily have these huge freight spends,” Whalen says. “So we saw an opportunity to offer access to marketplaces, dynamic rates, and capacity, especially for those smaller users without an annual upfront procurement cycle.”
BRIGHT SPOT IN DARK TIMES
The recent flurry of partnerships between established TMS developers and DFM startup firms will benefit all of the parties in the freight-booking process, the companies say.
By providing broad access to shared information, the enhanced offerings can expedite the process of matching shippers in need of freight service with truckers that can provide it. At the same time, they automate what has traditionally been a labor-intensive activity and create one-stop shops where users can complete multistep tasks on a single platform, according to the vendors.
And their timing couldn’t be better. Arriving in an era when the coronavirus pandemic is exerting unprecedented pressure on participants throughout the supply chain, those improvements could be a welcome change for shippers and carriers alike.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.