Forklift batteries that promote peak performance in refrigerator and freezer environments are in demand as e-commerce intensifies the need for cold storage warehousing.
Victoria Kickham started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for DC Velocity.
Demand for cold storage warehousing is rising nationwide, creating a growing need for material handling equipment that can withstand harsh-temperature environments. Choosing the right forklift battery is an important part of that process, as it can mean the difference between sluggish performance and top-notch productivity. We asked a handful of battery makers about what works best in refrigerator and freezer environments and found that some of the newest battery technologies on the market are making the most headway in low temperatures.
HEAT IT UP
All types of batteries, from traditional lead-acid batteries to newer technologies such as lithium-ion and thin-plate pure lead (TPPL) varieties, work in cold storage environments. The difference is how well they perform based on the requirements of the job. Heat is an important factor; a warm battery will perform better than a cold one because the chemical energy in a battery becomes less available as the battery gets colder, explains Tim Vaughan, director of engineering for lithium-ion battery manufacturer Flux Power.
“Just like it can be difficult to start your car on a cold morning, [lift] trucks can become more sluggish [in colder conditions],” he says, adding that a heated battery results in less degradation.
Lead-acid batteries that are in continuous use throughout a shift, for example, will perform better than those used intermittently, which will cool down during periods of inactivity and then warm up again when put back in use. But in general, these batteries don’t work as well as some of the newer technologies do in harsh environments, Vaughan adds. Several studies have shown that lead-acid batteries can lose as much as 30% of their capacity in refrigerator environments and up to 50% in freezer environments.
Other batteries are specifically designed to work in cold environments. These include lithium-ion batteries that feature on-board heaters that use only the energy necessary to keep the units to a proper functioning temperature, according to Vaughan. This allows the equipment to maintain normal truck performance without wasting energy to keep the battery warm.
“We use special solutions to make the lithium-ion battery operate better in the freezer,” explains Tim Karimov, president of battery maker OneCharge, referring to lithium-ion battery designers in general. “[We use] either insulation or a heater, or both, and when you apply those solutions, the batteries work at the same level as they do in ambient temperatures.”
OneCharge has introduced two types of batteries for cold storage applications, one that is ideal for coolers and can work efficiently in temperatures from 32 to 68 degrees Fahrenheit, and one that is ideal for freezer environments, functioning down to -22 degrees Fahrenheit, according to the company. Mark D’Amato, sales manager for OneCharge, emphasizes their high-performance capabilities.
“You get the same high level of performance out of the vehicle—that’s the key advantage,” he explains. “The battery doesn’t cause sluggish performance on site—you get the same high-speed operation throughout the discharge cycle despite the temperature.”
TPPL batteries come with similar benefits. EnerSys, which makes a range of battery solutions for material handling equipment, says its PURE TPPL battery can perform in temperatures as low as 12 degrees Fahrenheit, in addition to being able to withstand extreme shock and vibration. The company recently put the product through a series of extreme tests, including submerging it in ice to gauge low-temperature performance.
“Despite being put through some of the toughest conditions imaginable, our [battery] still produced power,” according to Jordann Gaspari, senior manager of marketing, motive power Americas at EnerSys, which produced a video highlighting the testing (see below). “It’s a testament to its unwavering ability to perform in even the most extreme circumstances.”
Battery management systems help too. These are electronic systems that monitor and manage rechargeable batteries, keeping track of a range of performance and maintenance data, including temperature. In some systems, sensors can detect when a battery’s temperature falls below the level at which it can run efficiently, allowing managers to heat the battery’s cells to bring the temperature back up. Flux Power has introduced an updated version of its battery management system and is continually adding to its data-collection and reporting capabilities, Vaughan adds.
“For many of our customers, we are producing a data-collection system that attaches to the batteries [so they can get] usage data in real time,” he explains, adding that more and more customers are demanding this information so they can make data-driven decisions to improve overall equipment and facility performance. “We’ve got to measure everything on our batteries.”
LOW MAINTENANCE, HIGH PRODUCTIVITY
The minimal maintenance requirements of newer-technology batteries can also be a big benefit in cold storage environments, where food and other perishable items are often stored and handled. The maintenance involved with traditional lead-acid batteries includes the risk of acid spills and fumes generated during watering and charging protocols, which also require removing the batteries and caring for them in separate charging rooms. Lithium-ion and TPPL batteries don’t require watering or long equalization charges; instead, they can be fast-charged and opportunity-charged throughout a shift to keep them running at peak efficiency. They also don’t require separate battery rooms for maintenance, freeing up space in a facility.
Battery makers have long touted the low-maintenance nature of lithium-ion batteries in particular, and Vaughan underscores their advantages in food and beverage operations.
“In general, they require much less operator or infrastructure involvement,” he explains. “Reduced maintenance applies in all environments, but the elimination of hazardous materials is a unique benefit utilized by food-storage folks.”
Experts agree the need for such equipment will only rise in the years ahead. As e-commerce continues its upward trajectory, online grocery and food-delivery orders are a growing part of the equation—especially as consumers have become more comfortable with online ordering during Covid-19–related shutdowns. Commercial real estate services firm CBRE has estimated that an additional 75 million to 100 million square feet of freezer/cooler space will be needed in the United States to accommodate that growth, for instance.
“We are seeing general growth in demand for our products, even though the material handling market is down,” Karimov of OneCharge says. “In terms of cold storage, we see repeat purchases for these applications and good acceptance of lithium-ion in [these environments].”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."