Brian Gibson is the Wilson Family professor at Auburn University’s Raymond J. Harbert College of Business. He is also executive director of the Center for Supply Chain Innovation.
The past four months have been unprecedented in the supply chain world—an understatement you might say! It’s not just that the ongoing global pandemic has laid bare the complexities and vulnerabilities of modern supply chains. There has also been unprecedented media attention paid to supply chain management. For better or worse, now the whole world knows about supply chains. In particular, warehousing and distribution have been brought out of the shadows and into the bright media lights for the critical role they play.
The upcoming edition of the “Logistics 2030” (L-2030) report, sponsored by JLL and CenterPoint, will focus on the growing importance of warehousing and distribution and the strategic direction they will take over the next decade. The annual study is conducted by the Center for Supply Chain Innovation at Auburn University in partnership with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), the National Shippers Strategic Transportation Council (NASSTRAC), and AGiLE Business Media (publisher of DC Velocity and CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly). This year’s report is based on multiple in-depth focus group discussions with leading supply chain executives and survey responses from a wide range of supply chain professionals. The release of the Logistics 2030 warehousing report and a related panel discussion are scheduled for August 20 at the fourth annual Fusion 20/20 Supply Chain Symposium (www.auburnscm.org/events).
The focus group meetings and survey results highlighted a key point: Even before the onset of COVID-19, the role of warehousing and distribution had been in transition from supporting downstream supply chain functions to operating as a frontline service provider to end customers.
This is quite a turn of events. Historically, warehousing and distribution were considered a cost center by business executives—a function that needed to be economized. But this view is now changing. A large majority (80%) of survey respondents in our L-2030 study point to a shift in the way top management in their firms think about warehousing and distribution. They are now recognizing the business value warehousing and distribution can provide. We notice a near consensus among survey respondents (88% agree) that warehousing and distribution will be an organizational priority by 2030. (See Figure 1.)
[Figure1] A changing perspective of warehousing and distribution Enlarge this image
The shift is on
A key trend underlying the new value proposition for warehousing is the ongoing shift in the supply chain structure. Supply chain executives in our focus groups point to the decentralization of supply chains arising from the need to push inventory closer to the customers. As one respondent said, “We’re going to be relocating facilities closer to customers in response to the need for faster deliveries. We’re going to put facilities in multiple places as opposed to just being at the most geographically central place.” Survey results indicate that firms’ push for forward inventory placement will continue into the next decade. The use of retail stores to fulfill e-commerce orders is expected to double. Additionally, 68% of respondents expect to see an increase in the use of local fulfillment centers and a 51% increase in regional distribution facilities by 2030.
Developing a decentralized warehousing and distribution structure requires major investments in infrastructure and technology. A big part of these future investments will be targeted towards expanding firms’ distribution networks. Eight-five percent of survey respondents expects a significant increase in corporate funding to improve warehouse and distribution. These investments will go towards developing key capabilities deemed essential in the coming decade: expanding distribution networks (71% of survey respondents agree), incorporating flexibility in capacity and warehousing operations (68%), leveraging automation for speed (62%), and cutting distribution costs (61%).
Our discussions with focus group executives highlighted a key capability deemed critical in the coming decade – flexibility in adjusting warehousing and distribution capacity. The importance of this capability is rooted in the need to respond to the ever-shifting whims of customers, now and in the future. Firms are investigating ways to be nimble by adjusting their supply chain capacity to match the continually changing demand patterns. “We’re looking at logistics facilities that are flexible in size, construction, and attributes geared towards a cross-dock-like capacity,” explained one respondent Thereby, a necessary capability in warehousing and distribution would be the agility to expand (and shrink) capacity quickly.
Embrace the tech
We asked focus group executives and survey participants how they planned to implement their decentralized distribution strategy. A clear consensus (supported by 93% of survey respondents) is that firms are looking to leverage technology as a catalyst to upgrade their warehousing and distribution processes.
In our study, we noticed a clear change in the conversation around technology that went beyond the typical issues of acquisition costs and implementation pains. We found supply chain executives to be focused more on a broader return on investment (ROI) perspective. One executive highlighted this point as follows: “We know that warehouse labor isn’t going to get any easier to recruit or retain. So as soon as we can justify ROI to replace labor with technology, we’re ready ‘to swing the bat’.”
Another element of this new conversation is the need for execution speed. One executive articulated this point as follows: “So in our [distribution centers] (DCs) we’re investing in ways to unload faster [and] load faster to make fulfillment of things faster so that we can do more with less people.” The cost-benefit analysis for technology solutions is starting to tilt towards a favorable business case for early adoption. “The economics of technology and what you consider in terms of labor availability and how far you’re willing to think about cost escalation or things like healthcare and fringe benefits. I think it’s changed the game in terms of the business ROI,” said one executive.
Our survey results indicate a high use of order management system by 2030 (71% of respondents agree). This software would align inventory and customer orders for fulfillment and shipping across multiple channels. Another big increase is expected in the use of warehouse execution systems (from 16% currently to 61% in 2030) that can provide a real-time coordination of labor and equipment for automated picking, packing, and shipping. Based on the survey results, we project that more firms will start using traditional warehouse management systems (an increase of 67%) by 2030.
In response to our survey question about technologies that have the most potential to disrupt warehousing and distribution, supply chain professionals identified the following: predictive and prescriptive analytics, automated guided vehicles, automated storage and retrieval systems, and automated conveyor systems. It is interesting to note how these technology choices align with automation, capacity expansion, and speed of distribution; all of which support operationalizing the emerging decentralized supply chain structure mentioned above.
In conclusion, warehousing and distribution are marching forward towards fulfilling their new role of a frontline function that drives business growth for firms. As the pendulum swings back to a decentralized supply chain structure, we expect companies to increasingly implement technology in warehousing and distribution in the coming years. To develop the necessary capabilities of speed and flexibility, supply chain executives are strategizing to make the requisite investments in distribution networks, incorporate technology, and engage capable third-party logistics partners to harness the opportunities that lie ahead.
[Authors’ Note: The Auburn University Fusion 20/20 Supply Chain Symposium will be held on August 20th. Register at www.auburnscm.org/events]
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
The overall national industrial real estate vacancy rate edged higher in the fourth quarter, although it still remains well below pre-pandemic levels, according to an analysis by Cushman & Wakefield.
Vacancy rates shrunk during the pandemic to historically low levels as e-commerce sales—and demand for warehouse space—boomed in response to massive numbers of people working and living from home. That frantic pace is now cooling off but real estate demand remains elevated from a long-term perspective.
“We've witnessed an uptick among firms looking to lease larger buildings to support their omnichannel fulfillment strategies and maintain inventory for their e-commerce, wholesale, and retail stock. This trend is not just about space, but about efficiency and customer satisfaction,” Jason Tolliver, President, Logistics & Industrial Services, said in a release. “Meanwhile, we're also seeing a flurry of activity to support forward-deployed stock models, a strategy that keeps products closer to the market they serve and where customers order them, promising quicker deliveries and happier customers.“
The latest figures show that industrial vacancy is likely nearing its peak for this cooling cycle in the coming quarters, Cushman & Wakefield analysts said.
Compared to the third quarter, the vacancy rate climbed 20 basis points to 6.7%, but that level was still 30 basis points below the 10-year, pre-pandemic average. Likewise, overall net absorption in the fourth quarter—a term for the amount of newly developed property leased by clients—measured 36.8 million square feet, up from the 33.3 million square feet recorded in the third quarter, but down 20% on a year-over-year basis.
In step with those statistics, real estate developers slowed their plans to erect more buildings. New construction deliveries continued to decelerate for the second straight quarter. Just 85.3 million square feet of new industrial product was completed in the fourth quarter, down 8% quarter-over-quarter and 48% versus one year ago.
Likewise, only four geographic markets saw more than 20 million square feet of completions year-to-date, compared to 10 markets in 2023. Meanwhile, as construction starts remained tempered overall, the under-development pipeline has continued to thin out, dropping by 36% annually to its lowest level (290.5 million square feet) since the third quarter of 2018.
Despite the dip in demand last quarter, the market for industrial space remains relatively healthy, Cushman & Wakefield said.
“After a year of hesitancy, logistics is entering a new, sustained growth phase,” Tolliver said. “Corporate capital is being deployed to optimize supply chains, diversify networks, and minimize potential risks. What's particularly encouraging is the proactive approach of retailers, wholesalers, and 3PLs, who are not just reacting to the market, but shaping it. 2025 will be a year characterized by this bias for action.”
Under terms of the deal, Sick and Endress+Hauser will each hold 50% of a joint venture called "Endress+Hauser SICK GmbH+Co. KG," which will strengthen the development and production of analyzer and gas flow meter technologies. According to Sick, its gas flow meters make it possible to switch to low-emission and non-fossil energy sources, for example, and the process analyzers allow reliable monitoring of emissions.
As part of the partnership, the product solutions manufactured together will now be marketed by Endress+Hauser, allowing customers to use a broader product portfolio distributed from a single source via that company’s global sales centers.
Under terms of the contract between the two companies—which was signed in the summer of 2024— around 800 Sick employees located in 42 countries will transfer to Endress+Hauser, including workers in the global sales and service units of Sick’s “Cleaner Industries” division.
“This partnership is a perfect match,” Peter Selders, CEO of the Endress+Hauser Group, said in a release. “It creates new opportunities for growth and development, particularly in the sustainable transformation of the process industry. By joining forces, we offer added value to our customers. Our combined efforts will make us faster and ultimately more successful than if we acted alone. In this case, one and one equals more than two.”
According to Sick, the move means that its current customers will continue to find familiar Sick contacts available at Endress+Hauser for consulting, sales, and service of process automation solutions. The company says this approach allows it to focus on its core business of factory and logistics automation to meet global demand for automation and digitalization.
Sick says its core business has always been in factory and logistics automation, which accounts for more than 80% of sales, and this area remains unaffected by the new joint venture. In Sick’s view, automation is crucial for industrial companies to secure their productivity despite limited resources. And Sick’s sensor solutions are a critical part of industrial automation, which increases productivity through artificial intelligence and the digital networking of production and supply chains.