Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
This year’s annual “State of Logistics Report,” released today by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), comes at a time when many businesses are reevaluating their logistics and supply chain strategies in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic and its related economic effects. As such, the report seeks to pause and provide a big picture view of the past year as well as some perspective on the path forward.
Now in its 31st year, the “State of Logistics Report” is researched and prepared by the consulting firm Kearney and sponsored by Penske Logistics. The report seeks to provide an in-depth look at the logistics industry, most notably by calculating U.S. business logistics costs as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) and pointing out major trends.
According to the report, logistics expenditure rose to $1.652 trillion in 2019 or 7.6% of the U.S.’s GDP of $21.4 trillion. This represented an improvement over 2018, when costs were at 7.9 percent of GDP. Indeed, 2019 felt like “a return to normal” after a “torrid” 2018, which saw increased logistics costs due to fast GPD growth and capacity shortages, according to the report.
[Figure1] In 2019, USBLC represented 7.6% of GDP—a return to normal for the industry Enlarge this image
However, that normal ran smack into an unprecedented pandemic, which led to measures such as social distancing and business closures. These efforts have derailed the economy and plunged the country into a recession. As the report’s introduction states, “The pandemic and global measures taken to reduce its further spread have decimated supply chains, scrambled logistics capabilities, and destroyed huge swaths of demand.”
The effects of the pandemic on the different logistics modes and nodes have been variable and unpredictable according to the report. For example:
Motor freight: Profitability was already suffering for motor carriers in 2019 as slowing demand and increased capacity led to a drop in freight rates and a rise in bankruptcies, even before the pandemic. This year, the report writers expect that small carriers with a small list of clients in the most affected industries (such as automotive, hospitality, and durable goods) will be the hardest hit by the pandemic. Large carriers will need to use technology to optimize asset utilization and routes to help them navigate the storm. Meanwhile, smaller carriers will need to turn to app-based solutions and brokers.
Parcel: Meanwhile the pandemic has been “a shot of adrenaline” to the parcel sector, as consumers turned to e-commerce and home delivery in the wake of the shutdown of physical stores, according to Zimmerman. Even before the pandemic, the parcel sector was growing strongly, with costs rising 8.5% in 2019.
Rail: The Covid-19 pandemic hit the rail industry hard, as it came out of 2019 with improved operations but declining volumes. The pandemic has caused a volume to drop even further, with year-over-year traffic down 25 percent.
Air: In 2019, the air freight sector saw costs fall by 9.7 percent, as the economy slowed down and volumes decreased. The pandemic led to a sharp decrease in air passenger travel, which in turn cut into cargo capacity, causing spot rates to soar.
Ocean: In response to the Covid-19 outbreak, ocean shipping companies cancelled sailings, reduced capacity, and raised rates. Volumes could rise in the second half of 2020 as Asian plants catch up to their backlog of demand, according to the report. However, carriers were already dealing with overcapacity and some may have to merge.
Warehousing: Rising e-commerce sales have continued to feed the demand for warehousing space. According to Zimmerman, new warehousing capacity was snapped up as quickly as it came online. This sentiment was echoed by Mark Althen, president of Penske Logistics during the panel discussion following the State of Logistics press conference. “We’re seeing increased activity in warehousing,” Althen said. “Shippers are looking to increase storage capacity closer to customers. They’re starting to move away from larger centrally located [distribution centers] to ones closer to urban areas.
THE WAY FORWARD
Many economists are tentatively predicting an economic rebound to begin in 2021. But according to Zimmerman, “the size, shape, and timing of the recovery remain in question.” Furthermore, for that recovery to happen, companies will need to quickly adapt and change their logistics abilities. Both the report and the panel discussion following the press conference outlined some of the changes that might occur. These included:
A move away from single sourcing toward “multi-shoring,” where companies rely on suppliers located in different countries and regions. According to Zimmerman, many companies had already started to make this major strategic shift as trade tensions began to rise in 2018. “Many of [Kearney’s] clients are diversifying away from China toward other low-cost countries and even the U.S. so that they have more options in their supply chain,” he said.
A similar move away from just-in-time fulfillment and lean inventories to larger inventories and more reserve capacity, as companies seek to increase the resiliency of their supply chains.
Greater demand from shippers for increased flexibility in how warehousing and third-party logistics companies manage their inventory and storage space. One option is taking a campus approach, where customers are housed in one location, said Zimmerman.
Risk and resiliency will become as important a consideration in supply chain design as speed and efficiency, and companies will employ more risk analysis in choosing supply chain partners.
Increased reliance on technology. According to Zimmerman, one of the reasons why logistics costs dropped in 2019 was that more transportation companies were using technology to optimize asset utilization and routes. To emerge from the current crisis, companies will need to continue to make investments in effective technology, including warehouse automation, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
In spite of the immense challenges that transportation and logistics companies have faced these past three months, the report asserts that the industry’s prospects are brighter than other sectors of the domestic economy. Zimmerman and his co-authors maintain a hopeful position that logistics is “an industry initially traumatized but ultimately resilient.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
DAT Freight & Analytics has acquired Trucker Tools, calling the deal a strategic move designed to combine Trucker Tools' approach to load tracking and carrier sourcing with DAT’s experience providing freight solutions.
Beaverton, Oregon-based DAT operates what it calls the largest truckload freight marketplace and truckload freight data analytics service in North America. Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but DAT is a business unit of the publicly traded, Fortune 1000-company Roper Technologies.
Following the deal, DAT said that brokers will continue to get load visibility and capacity tools for every load they manage, but now with greater resources for an enhanced suite of broker tools. And in turn, carriers will get the same lifestyle features as before—like weigh scales and fuel optimizers—but will also gain access to one of the largest networks of loads, making it easier for carriers to find the loads they want.
Trucker Tools CEO Kary Jablonski praised the deal, saying the firms are aligned in their goals to simplify and enhance the lives of brokers and carriers. “Through our strategic partnership with DAT, we are amplifying this mission on a greater scale, delivering enhanced solutions and transformative insights to our customers. This collaboration unlocks opportunities for speed, efficiency, and innovation for the freight industry. We are thrilled to align with DAT to advance their vision of eliminating uncertainty in the freight industry,” Jablonski said.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.