Private fleets and dedicated operations: A wider window of opportunity?
The desire for reliable, high-quality service has long been the basis of private carriage’s appeal. Pandemic-fueled disruptions and widespread market uncertainty will only up the ante.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
For the trucking industry, the Covid-19 pandemic has brought into stark relief something that businesses have recognized for some time and everyday citizens are now starting to truly appreciate: Trucking is the foundation of not just the economy, but of virtually every product consumers rely upon to maintain their daily lives.
The past two months have presented unprecedented challenges. What were carefully planned and optimized distribution networks have been thrown into disarray. Some markets, such as “essential” grocery, consumer staples, health care, and medical goods, are bursting at the seams with freight. Other segments, such as the more traditional less-than-truckload (LTL) and truckload shipments generated by small-business commercial, retail, industrial, and manufacturing operations, have disappeared as these businesses have gone dark and workers sent home under shelter-in-place mandates.
The good news: Truck drivers are being widely lauded for their courage, perseverance, and professionalism, braving difficult and sometimes dangerous conditions to deliver critically needed goods. Seldom in history has the importance of trucking to America’s financial and physical well-being been demonstrated so clearly, particularly since some 71% of all freight tonnage moves in the back of a truck, according to the American Trucking Associations.
And while the majority of these volumes move on commercial, for-hire LTL, and full-truckload carriers, one outcome of the market’s pandemic-fueled disruption has been rising interest in:
Purpose-designed dedicated operations, where truckload carriers assign a set of assets (trucks and drivers) and operate a “mini” network exclusively on behalf of that specific shipper, and
Private fleet operations, running within a larger non-trucking organization and providing secure, predictable product velocity and flow for some of the nation’s biggest enterprises.
These fleet options are finding a growing window of opportunity as shippers scramble to lock in reliable capacity, operational consistency, and high-quality service—and to secure protection against dramatic supply/demand swings in the market.
LOCKING IN CAPACITY
Today’s environment—with its widespread uncertainty about the immediate future—is not unlike the market that occurred shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, observes Don Digby Jr., president of Denver, Colorado-based refrigerated carrier Navajo Express. “The biggest demand is for secure capacity,” he notes. Shippers want “to know they’ll have the trucks. That [desire] has never been more relevant or prevalent than it is today.”
John Bozec, senior vice president and general manager, van truckload, at Green Bay, Wisconsin-based truckload carrier Schneider, agrees that predictable service at high levels is “a driving force” behind increased interest in dedicated. “The bar … is only getting higher,” he notes. Bozec cites three determining factors, especially for dedicated solutions addressing complex needs: “The ability to have capacity that is locked in and that [shippers] can rely on, at a price point they know, and [confidence in] the ability to get a great delivery experience. [That’s] why they want more dedicated and not less.”
The current environment notwithstanding, increased interest in dedicated services also continues to be driven by e-commerce–related traffic, observes Eric Downing, senior vice president, dedicated for Omaha, Nebraska-based Werner Enterprises. “Demand for dedicated services has increased, especially as e-commerce [volumes] have expanded and customer expectations for next-day and same-day delivery have increased,” he says. “As shippers move to get their products closer to customers, these types of transportation needs usually fit well within the dedicated model.”
Downing noted that while cost is always part of the equation, shippers looking to dedicated typically are pursuing a larger strategy, often around three primary goals:
1. High levels of service quality, normally 99% percent on time or better
2. Longer-term partnerships where the carrier is working closely with the shipper to drive improvements and efficiencies in the overall supply chain
3. Committed capacity that is consistent yet flexible.
“Customers who have volatility in their supply chain need the ability to quickly flex their fleets up and down, and a good dedicated provider can provide that kind of solution,” explains Downing.
Schneider’s Bozec adds that while “dollars are always important,” the decision to adopt a dedicated strategy often involves other value considerations that don’t show up on an Excel spreadsheet. One example, he notes, is the experience created for the customer. “We will do things like have drivers wear co-branded gear, and the equipment might be co-branded,” he notes. “When you make that delivery, countless times per day, that driver is creating a great experience, [and through that] there is brand equity for the customer that gets built up over time.”
He cites as well two key factors in launching a successful dedicated operation: getting the foundation right through open, frank communication, and effective change management. “We talk change management from the outset, from the C-suite to the loading dock,” Bozec says. “If both organizations don’t get that right, we won’t be as successful as the customer wants us to be and we want to be.”
Greg Orr, executive vice president, North America truckload for TFI International, and president of Joplin, Missouri-based truckload carrier CFI, noticed during March and April customer interest in what he terms “pop-up” fleets. “We’re being asked to provide short-term [60 days or less] committed capacity, deploying assets in certain lanes or between certain regions to address a surge in volume and ensure they’re delivering product to the end customer in a timely fashion,” he notes.
He also is seeing shippers looking to expand current dedicated arrangements. “Customers are coming to us saying, ‘You are handling five of these lanes, would you have interest in these other 10, and if so, could we be more flexible on rates with the additional volume?’” Ultimately, Orr believes carriers have to be more open and able to provide creative solutions that help shippers figure out how to better manage the ebbs and flows in their supply chains.
THE CHOICE TO GO PRIVATE
Why does a shipper look to a private fleet or dedicated operation, and what are the risks?
Ron Baksa is director of fleet procurement for Plano, Texas-based PepsiCo. Between its soft drink and snack products, PepsiCo, by one trucking industry ranking, operates the second-largest private fleet in the U.S. with some 62,400 total vehicles: 14,300 tractors and 48,100 trailers.
The very first question Baksa suggests that those considering a private fleet ask themselves: Are you ready for the commitment in capital, people, systems—can you manage it all? “The combination of people, process, and technology is a huge component,” he says. “You need all three to realize the full benefit.”
PepsiCo’s transportation footprint includes long-haul trucking between plants and distribution centers, and road trucks that deliver product from distribution centers to stores. Its trucks also go to market with products delivered to customer warehouses.
As for the advantages of operating a private fleet, Baksa says a key benefit is having “a cushion against [trucking] market conditions, both operational and financial. You are always able to support the business if you have a significant private fleet,” he says.
Another advantage is the ability to match equipment precisely to product needs. “A common carrier will have a generic 53-foot dry van for all business,” he explains. But that’s not always an efficient vehicle choice. “If you have a very lightweight or cube-sensitive product, you can haul quite a bit more by purchasing a large-cube trailer. Or for heavier product, you can spec more lightweight equipment,” he says.
The challenge is finding—and maintaining—the balance between the rate, the payload, and loaded miles, he adds. “If you can increase your payload [per trailer] by 10%, for every 10 loads you get a free load,” Baksa says, adding:
“The cheapest mile is the one you don’t run.”
A QUESTION OF BALANCE
Bart De Muynck, research vice president, transportation technology, at research firm Gartner, also emphasizes finding the right balance between factors that include priorities, needs, product perishability, velocity, management commitment, and the profile of freight within the shipper’s supply chain. He brings a unique perspective, having previously worked for many years in PepsiCo’s transportation group helping implement technology solutions before joining Gartner, where he serves as a leading transportation technology analyst.
“Companies in general who have private fleets [see] transportation as a very important part of execution,” he notes. “If you have your own fleet, you are guaranteed to execute, you don’t have to worry about [tender] rejections.” Quality factors into it as well, he adds. Shippers invest in private fleets for “high-quality, reliable service” and the guarantee of committed capacity at a relatively fixed cost.
Another benefit is attractiveness to drivers. “Private fleets pay better and have better driver retention,” offering stable runs, regular miles, and consistent home time, De Muynck says. He sees private fleets as ideal for scenarios such as intercompany transport, where truckloads move on regular routes between warehouses, factories and DCs, and/or retail locations, or where you have finished goods going from factory to warehouse, then raw materials moving in backhaul lanes to the factory.
Yet private fleets are not without risk, he warns. Shippers essentially are building and running a trucking operation within the larger enterprise. That means capital investment in rolling stock; building a team with specific transportation management skills, systems, and administrative processes; hiring, managing, and paying drivers; tracking hours of service and ensuring regulatory compliance; and maintaining the fleet.
Not every business is willing to make that leap. Which is where dedicated operations often become a viable solution, De Muynck notes. “Dedicated is almost like a private fleet—assets are dedicated to you,” he explains. “You can optimize routes, but the great thing is you don’t own the asset, you don’t have the upfront cap-ex investment or [responsibility for] hiring additional people. It’s [a good model] for having [secure] capacity, especially when the market tightens up.”
At the end of the day, opines Schneider’s Bozec, the decision on what route to take—private fleet, dedicated, common carrier, or a hybrid combination—comes down to one overriding goal: “It’s what I want to do for my business to win in the market.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."