Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
For years, freight managers and logistics service providers have leveraged the value of relationships, those whom you’ve worked with successfully in the past, as the door-opener to engaging and retaining clients and service providers. It has been a fairly common practice for logistics managers, as they moved to new companies, to bring along their third-party logistics service providers, or 3PLs.
That certainly still happens today. Yet the speed and scope of change in how shippers engage and utilize 3PLs, and the emergence of new enabling technologies, have created more complex, demanding, and data-driven service requirements that are foreshadowing the rise of the next-generation 3PL.
These next-generation players and their service portfolios are defined by speed, agility, adaptability, and continuous improvement. They have to operate reliably and seamlessly in an e-commerce-defined world. They are embracing digitization and technology for automating manual processes and creating even more data. And perhaps most important, they’re emerging as an “integration hub” connecting a far more diverse and interdependent set of systems, technology platforms, and data sources across the supply chain than ever before.
Most 3PLs will say that it’s still a relationship-based business. Yet while an important factor, for next-generation 3PLs, “our value has to go deeper than someone you knew,” says Tom Curee, senior vice president of strategy and innovation for West Chester, Ohio-based 3PL Kingsgate Logistics. “The whole evolution of technology has been transformative for us. It’s challenged us in a healthy way … we are taking a much more customized approach to solutions [yet] we don’t want [the customer] to lose that personal touch and experience,” he says.
Shippers are looking more and more to their 3PLs to lead the charge in providing process automation and integration between what have been disparate systems and sources of logistics information, observes Erin Van Zeeland, group senior vice president for Green Bay, Wisconsin-based Schneider Logistics, one of the industry’s largest providers of transportation management and logistics services. “It’s critical for a TMS [transportation management system] and the underlying technology [to have] the ability to integrate with third-party best-of-breed platforms,” she says. “Connectivity through APIs [application programming interfaces] for third-party data is happening at an accelerated pace [so] you have to be nimble.”
Among the third-party software platforms that Schneider has integrated with are Trucker Tools, for freight matching, automated load booking through its Book It Now app, and shipment visibility with small fleets and independent truckload operators; and Truckload.com, for automated booking of truckload shipments with third-party carriers.
Shipper expectations for, among other things, real-time visibility, innovation, and responsive, flexible service options reflect the undeniable influence of the Amazon-driven online buying experience enjoyed by today’s consumers. That’s a key driver behind the next-gen 3PL evolution, she notes.
“We as consumers have a completely different expectation than what existed years ago with visibility,” Van Zeeland explains. “In our personal experiences, we like the Amazon model and so do our customers,” she says, noting that Schneider Logistics and its customers are focused on driving more connected, automated, and intelligence-based processes. At the end of the day, it’s about breaking down silos and bringing timely, accurate data and quality decision metrics to the shipper’s table. “What was once tribal knowledge within an organization is now very much accessible,” she says.
A BRIGHT FUTURE FOR OUTSOURCING
Will outsourcing remain a key strategy for shippers as needs rapidly evolve, technology continues its inexorable march, and the next generation of 3PLs negotiate a winding path of change?
Without a doubt, says Geoff Turner, president and chief executive officer of Choptank Transport, a $300 million national 3PL and freight brokerage firm based in Preston, Maryland. “The significant investments 3PLs are making will keep outsourcing attractive because most shippers can’t keep up with the pace of technology development on their own,” Turner says. “They want to focus on their core competencies and let their 3PLs continue to invest on the logistics tech side.”
For Turner, keeping up with the pace of technological change—and customer demand for the newest and greatest—is the biggest challenge. “Our backlog of technology integration work is huge,” as shippers increasingly want more sophisticated tools and faster access to more data, more frequently, he says. One challenge he sees is continually educating shippers on just which technologies are most important and relevant to their needs, are effective and deployable, and properly align with and support joint goals and objectives.
“Five years ago, there were a handful of solutions” shippers and 3PLs would consider, says Turner. “Now there are dozens.” Consequently, shippers “are inundated with a barrage of ‘bells and whistles,’ which makes it a challenge to know what’s real and what’s marketing hype.”
Strip away all the hype, and “what [shippers] are really looking for,” Turner says, “is a solution or a set of capabilities that resolve two or three key recurring challenges.” In his experience, those are a robust visibility platform, with high carrier compliance providing automated visibility data end to end; algorithm-driven predictive freight-matching to automate matching and booking of truck to load; and optimizing the process to ensure Choptank is running the customer’s freight to minimize cost while maximizing capacity utilization and velocity.
Which, he adds, is also high on the list of tech features and capabilities desired by the thousands of small fleets and independent owner-operators that Choptank relies on for truckload capacity. “It’s all about the carrier experience, reducing friction, being easy to work with. We have to make sure we keep them in business, help them be efficient, and give them the tools, quality loads, and reloads they need to consistently maximize the hours they have to generate revenue,” Turner stresses.
Schneider’s Van Zeeland echoes his point about supporting the small truckload fleet operator and providing them with a positive experience through the entire cycle. “Our data shows that almost 90% of the carrier base [in truckload] is [fleets with fewer] than five trucks,” she notes, adding that Schneider Logistics works with thousands of carriers.
“Reaching out to, working with, and optimizing [small carrier] capacity is critical. We’re meeting the carriers where they are,” she says, explaining that this means deploying mobile-friendly technology that helps carriers streamline interactions, book the best loads in their preferred lanes, and execute transactions in a more automated way that saves time for both broker and carrier. It’s an approach designed to build trust and encourage collaboration, and demonstrate respect, understanding, and a willingness to help small carriers overcome the daily challenges they face to make a fair profit.
THE NEXT GENERATION: IS IT A 3PL OR 4PL?
To be a next-generation 3PL—or 4PL, a kind of uber-logistics service provider whose responsibilities may extend to managing a client’s other 3PLs—means responding faster to evolving shipper needs for more complex and sophisticated logistics planning and execution capabilities. These demands will expand the scope and scale of potential services 3PLs can weave deeper into the fabric of a shipper’s supply chain.
And the opportunity to redefine and expand their value through more automated, technology-driven—and profitable—services.
In a November 2019 report titled The Rise and Future of the 4PL Model,Gartner analysts Courtney Rogerson and David Gonzalez note that “managing ever-increasing logistics complexity while simultaneously improving visibility is a top priority and growing challenge for most shippers today—especially as the number of external partners and customers in the supply chain ecosystems grows.”
Furthermore, in an earlier research report, the 2019 Logistics Outsourcing Strategy Survey,Gartner polled 190 respondents, all senior logistics and supply chain operators, on their top three logistics priorities over the next 12 months. Almost half of the logistics leaders surveyed said updating their technology systems, increasing speed to customer, and improving visibility were their most important goals for the coming year (see Exhibit 1).
The study noted that “many survey respondents are focused on increasing technology capabilities that will concurrently improve visibility, data quality, and integrity, and decrease data gaps.” All of which provides an interesting strategic road map for today’s 3PLs to design and develop next-generation capabilities—or enhance those that exist today.
WOE BE THE SMALL BROKER?
Is there still a place in the market for the smaller, high-touch, service-oriented freight broker? Absolutely, says Andy Dyer, president of Chicago-based New Age Logistics, which is part of the Evans network of companies and which provides truckload brokerage and value-added logistics services. “Shippers have much bigger expectations of responsiveness,” says Dyer. “While we’re a smaller broker, we are often more agile, can respond faster, and can be more flexible—at a price point that has great value for the shipper,” he notes.
The infusion of capital into the logistics space and the resulting proliferation of technology choices means that even smaller players can compete with, out-hustle, and outperform many of the larger firms, he believes. In his view, the logistics tech revolution has completely upended the landscape, bringing advanced platforms and low-cost, cutting-edge capabilities to the masses. These are enabling quicker decisions, shorter implementations, easier training, and faster ramp-up to return on investment.
“You don’t have to run $5 billion worth of freight through your [in-house] system anymore to make the technology pay back,” Dyer notes. “You can run $100,000 worth of freight through, and it will work [and give you payback]. And [with APIs and pre-built integration modules], implementation is far faster and much more straightforward—with the go-live conversations starting at 30 to 45 days.”
Even with a new generation of 3PLs on the cusp, some basic fundamentals will never change, Dyer believes. “It’s very simple: Make your actions match your words,” he says, which is especially important in building and maintaining sustainable relationships with carriers. “Sell the load as it really is and make it easy for them to tender, track, and bill.”
His last piece of advice: “Dial down the hassle factor. Five different brokers at the same firm will have five different shipments with the same carrier, and all five are calling the dispatcher asking ‘Where’s my freight?’ It’s madness,” he says. “With the proliferation of GPS-enabled smartphones and driver apps … there should be no reason today for a broker to call a driver and ask where the freight is.”
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.