Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
Diana Mueller realizes the importance of flexibility in designing supply chains to meet an uncertain future. It is something she preaches to her clients almost daily.
As apparel and retail practice leader at supply chain design and integration house Fortna, she works with companies to design DCs that will meet their needs now and for years to come. But if you talk to Mueller, it quickly becomes clear that her role requires more than just design and process expertise. She also has to be something of a futurist as well as a kind of strategic adviser, helping client organizations build a solid case for their DC design and implementation projects.
Mueller has more than 10 years of business and leadership experience in supply chain and logistics. She recently spoke with DC Velocity Group Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald about the unique challenges of omnichannel, the importance of running “sensitivity” analyses, and how to get started with a DC design project.
Q: You work with companies in the apparel and retail sector, where things are obviously moving fast and changing rapidly. The need to innovate and adapt is essentially a ticket for admission to the game at this point. What are some of the most common challenges your clients face?
A: Before we get into the kind of challenges they are facing, I think it is important to level-set on what we mean by “flexibility” because I think everybody has a different view.
So, when I say “flexibility,” especially with regard to our omnichannel retail partners, I would say they are looking for both peak flexibility within the seasonal year-over-year look and for flexibility in terms of business dynamic changes. So, what happens if they add a new business unit or want to take on a different kind of distribution node? I think it is flexibility to do both of those things.
But to answer your direct question in terms of challenges, I would say there are two buckets that I’d put them in. There is a strategic look on it, but also an operational look. From an operational perspective, it is always a question of automation versus labor and what is that right mix and balance. So, I think the big challenges our executives are facing are related to questions like: How do I support peak? And how do I design a site that has the right labor/automation mix to support both peak and non-peak times?
I have a strong apparel and footwear background. So, from a more strategic view, I would say the customers we are working with are really focused on this seamless omnichannel experience. I think everybody that is out there wants to delight their customers with a seamless experience. I would say that is a big challenge that they’re working to address.
Then I would say the last challenge, from a strategic point of view, is a strategic alignment with their executive teams. It’s really a matter of telling the story of what it means for the company as a whole if I add these distribution capabilities and if I can service my customers faster. Telling that story strategically and how it aligns with their goals is a big challenge that we work through.
Q: You just gave some good guidance on some starting points, but what are some of the concrete steps you’d recommend to the typical customer?
A: We like to start with what we call a “value assessment.” Think of this as an entry point to what a business case could be. If you work through these distribution initiatives or add in certain capabilities, it is a good introductory step to get a lot of key stakeholders aligned early on in the process before you go down the line of working with a company like Fortna for six or nine months—however long one of these design engagements lasts. What are the goals? What are the capabilities? You should really test the whole value of what these new capabilities could [bring to] your organization.
Then once we have a design and a plan in place, we do a rigorous sensitivity-type analysis to understand it. What happens if, let’s say, e-commerce volume actually goes down and then traditional retail becomes more popular? What if the channel mix changes or you add a new channel? We feel that running those sensitivities on the design is a really important step toward overcoming a lot of those challenges.
Q: It seems for a number of years now, so much thematically has been about how much is changing and the accelerated pace of change. Is it time for logistics and supply chain executives to recognize the reality that change is the new normal?
A: I would agree that we live in times of change. I think customers are driving that change. I think they continually want to be challenged, delighted, and excited about the experience that brands are bringing them. I don’t think that will be going away anytime soon.
Q: Supply chain executives may recognize that they need to be doing all of these things, but they often don’t know where to begin. How do they start down that path?
A: The advice I would give them would be to start with alignment within your organization. I do think what makes or breaks a lot of projects are considerations like: Does it meet your corporate goals? Have your key stakeholders—like your finance team, your merchandising team, and all the other teams who are involved—bought in to where they see that the supply chain can bring them value and bring them to the future?
I would say that is something that’s really important as you start this journey. We have seen a lot of design projects go really far down the line only to fail to meet those goals and objectives.
Q: So, you need to figure out where you’re trying to go before you decide what path you’re going to take?
A: Exactly. I would totally agree with that.
Watch the complete interview with Diana Mueller below.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.