Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
The U.S. trucking sector idled along in 2019 absorbing generally flat to declining volumes, a slowing industrial economy, and an uptick in carrier bankruptcies. As the industry rolls into 2020, demand remains relatively soft, there are still too many trucks chasing too little freight, and the pricing pendulum has swung back in the shipper's favor. Add to that new regulatory mandates, higher operating costs, and a stubborn shortage of qualified drivers, and truckers in 2020 will have to overcome some serious bumps in the road to success—and profits.
"It's going to be a tough first half of the year" for both less-than-truckload (LTL) and truckload operators, says Bob Costello, senior vice president and chief economist with the American Trucking Associations (ATA). "No matter how you look at volumes, they've slowed," he notes, adding that there is "simply too much capacity out there." Couple that with higher driver pay scales, skyrocketing insurance premiums, and increases in virtually every other operating-cost area, and 2020 promises to give fleets all they can handle, Costello says.
Jim Fields, chief operating officer for Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania-based LTL truck line Pitt Ohio, doesn't expect to see much in the way of tailwinds that will help push carriers along in 2020. All of which means "we will need to create a better working environment in which to be successful," he says.
His areas of focus are driving productivity and creating more efficiencies in Pitt Ohio's processes, better utilization of equipment by type and size, optimizing the network, and making sure Pitt Ohio has the right book of business. Fields also emphasizes staying close to customers and using technology more strategically "to make it more efficient for customers to see [and utilize] data we push to them, rather than to call us multiple times a day." It's about driving a value proposition that resonates with shippers and meeting needs for fast, reliable service that helps them shave cost from their supply chains. Some 90% of Pitt Ohio's shipments are delivered overnight.
The market also continues to suffer somewhat of a hangover from businesses that overbuilt inventory in 2019 to avoid trade risks, notes Darren Hawkins, chief executive officer of Overland Park, Kansas-based YRC Worldwide (YRCW), which operates national and regional LTL carriers and provides logistics services.
Overarching geopolitical concerns and a weak global manufacturing sector signal some continued risk, yet progress with China trade negotiations and the ratification and signing of the new USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) trade pact offer potential upside. "If inventories rebalance in the first half of 2020, ... shipment volumes will stabilize and benefit from what could be a better growth environment," Hawkins says. He adds that the YRCW carriers will continue to implement their fleet upgrade plan in 2020. Since 2015, the company has put into service "well over 5,000 new tractors and 12,000 trailers," he reports.
THE REALITY OF TRUCKING IN 2020—A MIXED BAG
The general sense that the market is soft and any meaningful uptick in freight volumes won't occur until the second half of the year is shared by a number of industry analysts as well.
"The economy in general is a mixed bag," notes Avery Vise, vice president of trucking for FTR Transportation Intelligence, a Bloomington, Indiana-based research firm. His research projects overall growth in freight volumes of less than 1% in 2020. In terms of hurdles to overcome, he cites the outbreak of the coronavirus in China as a "shock to the [global trade] system" as well as continuing pockets of weakness in industrial manufacturing and durable-goods orders.
Presenting at a recent industry conference, Vise outlined five themes he describes as "the reality of trucking" in 2020:
Freight volumes aren't growing, but they aren't collapsing.
Spot rates are down from 2017-18, but they aren't really that bad.
Insurance costs are soaring.
The ELD (electronic logging device) mandate certainly has been a challenge, especially for small carriers.
Trucking failures are, indeed, above trend.
But the number of new entrants is significant (Exhibit 1), and lost carriers do not equal lost capacity.
Not all industry players see a year of dark clouds on the horizon. Marty Freeman, executive vice president and chief operating officer of Thomasville, North Carolina-based Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL), is "very optimistic" about 2020, citing the ratification of the USMCA pact, a partial trade agreement with China, and employment holding steady.
"We talk to our customers every day and ask them the same question [about the outlook for 2020]. We get [answers] anywhere from flat to 5% to 6% growth," he says. Shippers, in ongoing efforts to manage costs, also continue to seek providers who can service multiple supply chain needs under one roof, a "one-stop shop," notes Freeman. "That helps us become stickier with customers" by leveraging ODFL's core LTL services with its capabilities in truckload brokerage, expedited service, household moves, international forwarding, and port drayage.
"We're not the cheapest service provider in the LTL stable," Freeman admits. "Our value prop is on-time service with low claims at a fair price." It's a strategy that has delivered the best operating ratio in the LTL business for a decade.
Satish Jindel, founder and president of Warrendale, Pennsylvania-based SJ Consulting Group, also is relatively optimistic. He forecasts LTL carriers, despite a soft market, securing rate increases in the 3% to 4% range, while truckload carriers can expect rate hikes from flat to 2.5%.
He cautions fleets to be prudent about truck investments, even those intended as replacements, to avoid worsening the current oversupply situation. "You have to realize that when you add trucks to replace, you are adding to overall market capacity. Used trucks do not go into a landfill," he says. "They stay on the road and go to smaller carriers who could not afford to pay the $150,000 cost of a new truck."
Jindel also suggests that LTL carriers need to get away from a mindset he calls "put down the ducky," a colorful description for a practice where operators are "too much in love with running around town with a tractor and 53-foot trailer carrying a lot of air and empty trailer space at higher cost." He points out that LTL carriers who emphasize deploying more straight trucks and tractors pulling 28-foot "pup" trailers in city operations are "some of the most profitable carriers" because they are "better at utilizing the smaller equipment."
REGULATION REDUX
Major new regulatory mandates that went into effect in the past 15 months also impact the industry and its prospects going forward.
The implementation of electronic logging devices and rollout of a nationwide driver drug-testing clearinghouse meant fleets in many cases had to purchase and install new ELD equipment in trucks, and update testing policies and procedures. In both cases, operating, societal, and safety benefits resulted as fleets got up to speed.
Old Dominion's Freeman notes his company started its ELD implementation in January 2019 and conducted a "full-court press" throughout the year, completing the changeover to new technology, processes, and procedures, including new tablet computers in trucks, by November. He looks for "good things" from ELDs in terms of more comprehensive and timely data on driver and truck performance, which can be utilized to improve safety and operating efficiency.
YRC Worldwide was "fully compliant with the transition from AOBRDs (automated on-board recording devices) to ELDs long before the deadline," says Hawkins, adding that the two-year window afforded by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) gave carriers sufficient time for a smooth transition. "Among other opportunities, we utilized peer-to-peer training with our drivers to make sure they were prepared," he says.
Hawkins notes as well the positive impact from the launch of the federal Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse, citing it as an example of the industry working in concert with the FMCSA to advance safety. "The best way to approach safety is as an investment," Hawkins says. "The power of partnership [between government, fleets, and shippers] is ... another avenue for us to collectively advance safety."
FTR's Vise adds that in his view, the impact of the new clearinghouse (which launched on Jan. 6) on available qualified truck drivers could be significant over time. "In the past, if you failed the test, you'd just go to another carrier. Now, [that test result] goes into the clearinghouse. We didn't have the data before on how many drivers were failing the pre-employment test. The other factor [that will potentially affect driver supply] is those who know they'll test positive and just leave the business."
There's also potential for improving driver quality of life and productivity, as ELDs have equipped fleets with tools to more precisely and quickly measure detention and wait times a driver must deal with at shipper docks. "Days of giving [the shipper] two hours of free time at the dock ... should be [coming to an end]," says SJ Consulting's Jindel, adding that excessive detention by shippers is a waste that reduces the driver's earning power and inhibits productivity and utilization.
DRIVER SHORTAGE—IT'S HOW YOU DEFINE IT
A shortage of qualified truck drivers also remains high on the list of concerns for shippers and carriers alike. That's particularly true in the truckload market, where 60% annual turnover is considered a victory.
Old Dominion's strategy has been to grow its own when it comes to drivers. Since it launched its in-house driver-training program in 1988, the company has graduated 5,900 CDL (commercial driver's license)-qualified drivers from its schools, notes Freeman, adding that 55% of those graduates are still with the company today.
Donald Broughton, principal and managing partner of Clayton, Missouri-based Broughton Capital, a transportation market research and analysis firm, thinks the driver shortage suffers from a gross misconception. He says whether or not there is a shortage "depends on how you define [it]," citing three determining factors: how much you're willing to pay in wages and benefits; how stringent your requirements are for safety performance, reliability, and other employee quality criteria; and how much you're willing to invest to take care of your employees and provide good quality of life (i.e., get them home regularly).
On one end of the spectrum are the higher-compensated driving jobs with dedicated and private truckload fleets, as well as parcel carriers like UPS, where, Broughton quips, driver turnover is mostly a function of "death or retirement." In the middle is the LTL market, where the latest ATA figures peg driver turnover at about 9%. On the other end of the spectrum are the long-haul full truckload irregular-route driving jobs, where "someone is paid $45,000 a year and you get them home [maybe] every two weeks," he says, adding that in this corner of the trucking world, "you'll never get enough people."
Broughton also lauds the launch of the new Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse as an overwhelming positive for the industry and public. "That you used to be able to fail a drug test at one company and then go to another was absurd," he says. The new clearinghouse "was long overdue" and "a commonsense mandate that makes the world safer for all of us."
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.