Airfreight industry players have spent years—if not decades—adapting to constantly changing market conditions. Between e-commerce, Amazon, global trade, and the march of technology, that's unlikely to change anytime soon.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
It seems like every decade since the airlines were deregulated in 1978, the airfreight industry, and the airfreight forwarders that have served as the industry's backbone, has reinvented itself.
The latter part of the 1990s and certainly the first two decades of the 2000s have seen perhaps the most dramatic evolution. During this time, the industry witnessed UPS expand from its traditional U.S. ground package service to launch its own airline and add forwarding, buy a less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier, expand into global operations, and offer integrated logistics; FedEx branch out from express air into ground parcel, the LTL business, international service, and contract logistics; growth in the outsourcing of logistics domestically and worldwide; and forwarders morphing from middle-players into third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) with a wider portfolio of capabilities.
Then there was the rise of Amazon, the birth and then explosive growth of online commerce, the emergence of longer and more complex supply chains as global trade expanded and interdependence increased, and a technological revolution in transportation and logistics unlike anything previously seen in the industry.
"When I came into the business 25 years ago, most of what we moved went by air—and 60% to 70% of it was domestic," recalls John Hill, president and chief commercial officer of Glen Mills, Pennsylvania-based Pilot Freight Services. That freight moved in the bellies of passenger airlines and with the integrated all-cargo carriers, such as the venerable Emery Air Freight, acquired by UPS in 2004, and Burlington Air Express, acquired by the logistics division of Germany's Deutsche Bahn in 2006.
Today, Hill says, maybe 5% of the shipments Pilot handles domestically move by air, with the rest staying on the road running in a package, ground forwarding, truckload, or Pilot's own ground network. Globally, some 85% of Pilot's shipments move via air, with the rest ocean.
The old airfreight forwarder model where you were the middleman who arranged a "full mile" transportation service and worked primarily with business and industrial customers? It's been mostly relegated to the dustbin of history along with Addressograph machines and rotary-dial telephones.
Like many airfreight forwarders who have evolved, Pilot still provides basic forwarding services, but today, it is broader-based, working with customers on a range of challenges: strategic transportation management, designing the optimal distribution network, and managing efficient warehousing and fulfillment operations. Pilot also provides "back of store" next-day last-mile delivery of heavier goods, such as furniture and appliances, into homes. And it has a variety of discrete, value-added logistics services that can be configured to address specific segments or unique needs of the customer's supply chain.
Hill's experience at Pilot isn't unique among airfreight forwarders. Changing markets, economics, technology, and customer expectations all require expanded capabilities and resources if forwarders are to stay abreast of the evolving needs of today's shippers. As a result, many progressive forwarders are figuring out how to reinvent themselves to compete and keep pace with a fast-changing business.
THE E-COMM JUGGERNAUT
As for what's driving all the change, much of it comes down to shifting consumer shopping patterns and delivery expectations. Like most segments of the transportation industry, air freight has been impacted by the explosive growth of e-commerce, "which is essentially reducing airfreight volumes," says Satish Jindel, president of Warrendale, Pennsylvania-based SJ Consulting Group, a transportation and logistics research firm that provides strategic consulting, industry insights, and analytical tools to shippers.
As Amazon and other online retailers have re-engineered supply chains, they've restructured their distribution footprints to feature more smaller warehouses in closer proximity to the end-consumer. That's caused a shift favoring smaller parcel/package shipments versus larger pallet-loads, and shorter length-of-haul—both of which negate the need for traditional airfreight consolidation services.
And while more parcel volume has been good for UPS and FedEx (and Amazon's own dedicated transportation operations), those smaller, more-frequent shipments traveling shorter distances, which defines e-commerce traffic, are going via ground services versus air—especially if it's 500 miles or less.
With consumers expecting virtually everything they order online to come with free next-day or, increasingly, same-day shipping, "sellers want to move [the freight] in the cheapest way, so many times that's going to be ground, not air," Jindel notes.
And then there is the elephant in the room, Amazon itself. What's been its impact on air freight and the forwarding market?
"Not so much of an impact on the average forwarder," says Bob Imbriani, executive vice president, international, for Flower Mound, Texas-based forwarder and 3PL Team Worldwide and a board member of the Airforwarders Association, a Washington, D.C.-based advocacy organization for the aircargo forwarding community.
For most airfreight forwarders, Amazon has not been a major customer, Imbriani says, although in many cases, forwarders are managing transportation and logistics for clients selling goods through Amazon or as an Amazon vendor. "Even with the explosion of e-commerce, there is still a considerable market for specialized heavy-weight cargo and even just general volumes of B2B [business-to-business] cargo," he says, such as managing ground services moving pallet-loads and truckload volumes between distribution centers. "But there is no question that if you look at the pie, the traditional slice available to forwarders is shrinking, going to full-service trucking, FedEx, or UPS, or becoming e-commerce traffic."
And that pie may continue to shrink as Amazon absorbs into its own domestic logistics and transportation network more and more bulk cargo moving from vendors to distribution centers as well as between DCs.
Even so, Imbriani emphasizes that as online commerce continues to grow and technology takes over more and more of the block and tackle of transportation management, Team Worldwide is keeping one key asset in place—the human touch. "We believe it is vitally important to have experienced, trained people, using [the latest] technologies to support service for the customer," he says.
"Technology can improve data, and streamline process and communication, but it doesn't replace people—it complements their abilities," Imbriani adds. "Their knowledge, insight, and skill have to be at the forefront; that's critical to resolving problems quickly and providing customized solutions."
REWRITING THE PLAYBOOK
Pilot Freight Services' Hill shares another perspective. "Amazon is looking to potentially disintermediate all the segments of their supply chain business," he says. "So instead of coming to a 3PL for the full-mile solution, [they're asking] 'What if you just did the linehaul or final mile?'"
His point is that supply chain service providers, in response to Amazon and others, are splitting out what once was a consolidated service into an à la carte menu of specific services from which the shipper can pick and choose.
For Pilot, says Hill, working with Amazon has been a game-changer. "It's been phenomenal; they've made us a better company, pushed us to achieve stretch goals ... to a degree we never thought we could do. Now, our overall offering for every customer is better because of how Amazon pushed us." Pilot supports Amazon DCs and vendors, doing the full door-to-door service including pickup, linehaul delivery, and last mile, as well as white-glove "inside the home" delivery and installation of big and bulky items.
Hill recalls the day when as an airfreight forwarder, your focus was the B2B decision-maker. "Now, everyone is a decision-maker; they relate to the delivery we make to their home, how we perform."
He shares a story of a recent sales call, where a retailer reached out to Pilot and asked for a meeting. "I asked them 'Why were we considered?' He told me 'You guys did an Amazon delivery to my house and did it better than everyone else. And that's why I'm talking to you now.'"
PASSENGER LINES GET IN ON THE ACT
Meanwhile, the aircargo divisions of passenger airlines also are upping their game and investing in technology to provide better visibility as well as more reliable delivery of freight that moves in the bellies of passenger jets. Delta Cargo, for example, has invested on several fronts. "It became clear that [customers] wanted complete transparency in the cargo shipment process," says Shawn Cole, vice president of Atlanta-based Delta Cargo. In response, Delta introduced Bluetooth ULD (unit load device) tracking for its containers in 2018, "which enhances our ability to manage our ULD fleet," he notes.
The company also has outfitted 86 warehouses with ULD Bluetooth readers, while 208 of its domestic customers also have readers. Out on the runway, Delta Cargo has readers at 51 airside ramps and has outfitted 13,974 of its ULD containers with tracking tags—all designed to increase the speed, reliability, and accuracy of shipment tracking.
It has also launched Delta Dash Door-to-Door, a unique same-day delivery service in partnership with Roadie, which operates a crowdsourced network of on-demand, same-day delivery drivers across the U.S. Roadie's "on the way" model sources drivers in their own vehicles who are already headed to a delivery point.
Cole says that "Dash Door-to-Door was created for time-critical shipments in industries including medical, manufacturing, automotive, and industrial parts" that need reliable, expedited aircargo service. Under the program, Dash Door-to-Door pairs TSA-approved Roadie drivers with scheduled aircargo service. Delta Cargo provides the "belly freight" air linehaul capacity, while Roadie does the first- and last-mile transport, principally on a same-day basis. It's an integrated service currently available from Atlanta to over 55 cities in the U.S.
POISED FOR A REBOUND?
What does the future have in store for air freight?
From a macroeconomic standpoint, at least, the picture is brightening. After a year of contraction in 2019, the worldwide aircargo market is poised again for growth, albeit modest, according to the International Air Transport Association (IATA), a Montreal-based airline trade group. "Freight traffic fell 3% [to 61.2 million metric tons], while yields declined 5%" in 2019, says Andrew Matters, IATA's deputy chief economist. Matters notes that IATA's expectations are for a small recovery in demand in 2020, with traffic forecast to grow 2%. However, IATA also projects that cargo yields, coming off a slide of 5% in 2019, will decline another 3% in 2020, stabilizing at around $101.2 billion.
The past year saw air freight suffer from "the effects of the trade war between the U.S. and China, the deterioration in global trade, and a broad-based slowing in economic growth," Matters says. "While airlines have been reducing capacity growth in response ... it's clear that there exists an overcapacity situation for air cargo."
On the bright side, Matters says that "looking to 2020, world trade growth is expected to rebound to 3.3% from 0.9% in 2019, as election year pressures in the U.S. contribute to reduced trade tensions."
Brandon Fried, executive director of the Airforwarders Association, also believes things are looking up. While 2019 was a difficult year, "I'm more optimistic [about 2020] for a couple of reasons," he says.
Fried believes that "the tariff thing" between the U.S. and China will be resolved. "Trump is up for re-election, and he'll want to get some points on the board beforehand." Also, as offshore sourcing and manufacturing has shifted from China to other countries in Southeast Asia, "those countries are providing avenues of opportunity for airfreight forwarders," he says.
NEW OPPORTUNITIES
In fact, Fried sees a number of market opportunities opening up for forwarders. He cites as examples the market for specialized services, such as cold-chain, pharmaceuticals and perishables, and project cargo, all of which could be "a shot in the arm" for forwarders, who excel at freight with special handling or expediting needs.
Other opportunities are emerging thanks to the likes of Amazon, FedEx, UPS, and other operators breathing life into once-shuttered civilian/military airports. Those include Ohio's Wilmington Air Park, where in June last year, Amazon Air started daily dedicated flights with Amazon-logoed aircraft; and Rickenbacker International Airport in Columbus, Ohio, which has been reborn as a thriving international aircargo hub. Airlines serving Rickenbacker include AirBridgeCargo, Asiana Cargo, Cargolux, Cathay Pacific Cargo, China Airlines, Emirates SkyCargo, and Etihad Cargo, all offering weekly scheduled service for U.S. importers and exporters. "Freight forwarders are co-loading on these flights," Fried says.
And lastly, with Amazon spinning up its own fleet of aircraft, that could present an interesting capacity opportunity for forwarders. "If Amazon has 100 airplanes a year from now, chances are they may have some empty [backhaul] space" that could be offered to forwarders, Fried says.
Which could indeed be another interesting development for a business that's once again adapting to new realities. Through it all, some things are everlasting. "We get paid to move boxes for a living," Fried says, adding "One common thread is that we are atypical. Forwarders do everything. There is no such word as 'no'—or 'fail'—in our vocabulary."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."