Going into the new year, the logistics sector faces fierce headwinds that include an ongoing labor shortage, freight-rate volatility, and economic uncertainty. New technologies and strategies may be key to weathering the storm.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
The ongoing labor shortage is one of the most pervasive trends to sweep the logistics industry in years. With the U.S. unemployment rate at its lowest point in half a century, businesses are scrambling to stay fully staffed even as they search for ways to scale up and cope with new challenges.
That balancing act gets even harder in tricky economic conditions. Heading into 2020, the market faces headwinds like a global manufacturing slowdown, shifting tariff rates, red-hot e-commerce growth, and the "Amazon effect," as online shoppers seek ever-faster and cheaper home delivery. So as logistics leaders prepare to navigate those dangerous waters, they are increasingly turning to new strategies and technologies.
To better understand how this will all play out in 2020, we consulted with experts from different corners of the industry. Their overall advice for the new year? Buckle up; it could be a bumpy ride.
ROBOTS CUT WASTE, NOT JOBS
Automation is a crucial tool for helping organizations cope with a shortage of workers, especially for jobs that are located far from population centers, such as in rural warehouses. In the year ahead, that labor shortage will help accelerate the adoption of robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) for many supply chain functions, according to the Framingham, Massachusetts-based analyst firm IDC.
As for how quickly that will happen, the firm offered some estimates in a recent report titled IDC FutureScape: Worldwide Supply Chain 2020 Predictions. Among other predictions, the firm forecast that by 2022, manufacturers and retailers will dedicate 35% of their business process budgets to "process automation," focusing on order, inventory, and shipment tracking. It also predicted that by 2023, 65% of warehousing activities will use robots and situational data analytics to enable storage optimization, increasing capacity by over 20% and cutting work order-processing time in half.
Despite the rising tide of automation, technology is not expected to slash the total number of jobs in the logistics sector, but rather to replace some unskilled jobs with more productive, less redundant work, according to the IDC report's author, Simon Ellis, who is program vice president for the Supply Chain Strategies practice at IDC Manufacturing Insights.
As companies prepare to incorporate robotics and AI into their logistics operations, they will need to reconcile the contradictory notions of technology replacing jobs with the overall talent shortage that is driving that trend, Ellis says. Just as Henry Ford's production line ultimately created far more jobs in the automotive industry than it displaced, technology will drive long-term growth in logistics, he says.
"There are dual perspectives around this. Will certain jobs be replaced by technology? Yes. And will certain people be disenfranchised by robots that are more productive? Probably so. But will technology have a net negative impact on the job market? I don't think so," Ellis says. Instead, many displaced workers and managers will be retrained for new jobs, such as maintaining the new technology or servicing the robots, he predicts.
Despite the pressing need for change in 2020, the transformation from older analog processes to newer digital processes will not happen all at once, according to the IDC report. Rather, companies sailing toward "digital transformation" goals will need to manage hybrid environments for years to come. For example, IDC pointed out that most new supply chain software exists on cloud-based computing platforms, but older logistics applications will continue to run on local, on-premise servers for at least another decade.
WAREHOUSES WOO WORKERS WITH FLEXIBLE HOURS
As companies seek to boost productivity in the stormy business conditions expected to prevail throughout 2020, they will also need to adopt a new approach to managing labor, experts say. For example, one of the keys to attracting ideal workers during the labor crunch will be to offer more flexible schedules, according to Scott Sureddin, CEO of third-party logistics service specialist DHL Supply Chain, North America.
"Flexibility may be one of the most important supply chain issues heading into the next decade—and it has nothing to do with the actual movement of goods," Sureddin said in an email. "Associate expectations are changing, and they are demanding greater flexibility at work. Companies are going to need to rethink traditional HR practices if they hope to continue to attract and retain top talent."
In fact, hourly workers favor flexibility above traditional compensation like pay and perks, according to the Chicago-based on-demand staffing technology platform provider Bluecrew. In a recent analysis of more than 10,000 job-offer rejections, the company found that a quarter (26%) of the jobs were rejected due to the hours, compared with just 10% of jobs that were rejected due to pay.
In a tight labor market, offering flexibility around scheduling and hours is a strategic way to attract and retain workers without raising wages, according to the company.
"Not only are employers facing unemployment [that stands] at a 50-year low, [but] they're also going head to head with gig companies that offer workers a level of flexibility [that's] unprecedented," Bluecrew CEO Adam Roston said in a press release. "To compete in 2020, we'll see employers continue to shift their hiring and retention strategies. More employers will offer flexibility ... to lure hourly job seekers."
Still, job flexibility isn't the whole story, Bluecrew says. As the labor landscape changes, employers will likely adjust their HR practices in other ways as well, the company says. These include offering career growth opportunities through new training, also known as "upskilling," and the use of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence to enhance hiring effectiveness by focusing on objective job-performance data and eliminating inherent biases such as appearance.
FREIGHT-RATE VOLATILITY AHEAD
Even if your digital transformation is underway and your DC is fully staffed, a logistics operation still has to move physical inventory. Shippers have enjoyed low trucking rates in recent months, but a turbulent freight market will likely continue to churn in 2020, swinging the compass needle in new directions, according to the Portland, Oregon-based loadboard operator DAT.
In its most recent forecast report, 2020 Freight Focus, DAT notes that 2018 was a peak year for freight pricing in the trucking sector, as a surging economy generated more demand for service than the truckload sector could supply. In response, motor carriers rushed to add capacity, placing record numbers of new-truck orders and raising wages in a bid to attract more drivers.
But then the picture changed. Demand for motor freight services softened in 2019, leading to a glut of capacity and driving truckload rates back down. Pushed to the brink by those falling rates, a number of carriers closed their doors in the first half of 2019, causing capacity to shrink again, DAT says.
Now, continuing consumer spending and hot e-commerce sales are on pace to drive demand back up again. That could trigger a rebound in spot-market truckload rates in mid-2020, unless they're held in check by external factors like severe weather, uncertainty caused by trade wars, or the outcome of the presidential election, according to DAT.
Given the potential for sudden squalls in the 2020 forecast, even the most experienced logistics executive could run afoul of volatile business conditions this year. But applying new technologies and new strategies could help these leaders and their companies survive—or even thrive—as they navigate the tumultuous times ahead.
Editor's note: This article was revised on Jan. 14 to say that DAT is located in Portland, Oregon. An earlier version listed the wrong location.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."