The “Robotics as a Service” model provides users with autonomous bots for a monthly subscription fee, allowing them to swiftly scale up their operations for peak season.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
The first snowflakes of the season are falling in many parts of the country, which means that warehouse operators and parcel carriers alike are hiring tens of thousands of temporary workers to cope with the demands of the peak holiday shopping season.
That task is proving harder in 2019 than in past years, as record-low unemployment rates are making it hard to hire enough workers to fully staff fulfillment centers. That's forcing employers to brace for a blizzard of overtime bills and to crank up the thermostat on an already hot job market by raising wages.
However, providers of warehouse robots say there's a better solution. Many robot vendors are now renting or leasing robots to their customers on a short-term basis, allowing DCs to ramp up their operations during peak periods and then scale back once the activity dies down.
There are several variations on the approach, but the most common is called "Robotics as a Service," or RaaS. These services are usually offered on a subscription basis, with customers paying monthly fees instead of buying their robots outright. In exchange, vendors deliver autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) and then provide tech support as well as regular updates to the hardware and software that enable them to navigate DCs.
BOTS KEEP THEIR HEADS IN THE CLOUD
Companies that choose the RaaS option are typically logistics or retail operations that are already using bots in their warehouses but need additional support during peak periods or in times of severe labor shortages, according to 6 River Systems Inc., a Waltham, Massachusetts-based warehouse robotics startup that offers its "Chuck" series of AMRs on an RaaS basis.
For operations with existing robot fleets, commissioning additional units is a simple matter, vendors say. Once a warehouse technician switches them on, the newly arrived robots connect to a DC's wireless network and link to critical information like an inventory floor map, the location of electrical outlets for recharging, and an interface with the building's warehouse management software (WMS).
The robots access that data but never download it from the cloud, so the only information physically stored on a robot is its own navigation software and collision-avoidance system, says Melonee Wise, CEO of Fetch Robotics, a San Jose, California-based AMR vendor that offers RaaS plans. If a vendor swaps out an older robot for a new one, it resets its onboard computer, ensuring that sensitive information on sales and customers never leaves the building, she says.
That approach makes it easy to add more robots to a fleet because every robot shares the same knowledge base, Wise says. In fact, warehouse managers often find the technical setup process to be easier than training their human employees to work with the new equipment, she adds.
"You have to have your workers be ready to interact with the new robots," Wise says. In past years, workers were sometimes afraid the robots would take their jobs, but the latest generation of workers is more likely to see robots as collaborative tools to help boost productivity. "The fear is no longer losing their job, but being competent enough to work with the robot," Wise said during a recent panel discussion on supply chain technology during the MHI Annual Conference in La Quinta, California. "So if you can disarm that as soon as possible, they transition to embracing their robot co-worker. And then they go from fear to curiosity."
ROBOTS ON THE RISE
Thanks to its rising popularity, the RaaS approach is helping to accelerate the adoption of robots in the logistics industry, reports Karen Leavitt, chief marketing officer at Locus Robotics, a Wilmington, Massachusetts-based AMR vendor that offers RaaS plans.
"[RaaS] is terrific for customers because it provides them with a low threshold to entry; you don't have to write a check for $1 million, just $10,000 a month," Leavitt says. For customers, it's a low-risk proposition because the pay-as-you-go service is considered an "operational expense" in accounting terms, as opposed to a purchase-based "capital expense."
"If it were a cap-ex purchase and then you have second thoughts, you've already bought it and it basically becomes a large paperweight in your facility," Leavitt says.
In addition to flexibility, RaaS plans offer users many of the same advantages as the popular Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) subscription-based software offerings, Leavitt notes. "So, like with SaaS, [you can] rely on the fact that you're going to have quarterly updates to the software. And you share a long-term business relationship," she adds.
According to Locus, that relationship is critical to helping warehouse operations deal with one of the most pressing challenges of the era—the labor shortage. "The macro problem we're addressing is labor availability and effectiveness," Leavitt says. "Because labor is unavailable, wage rates have been going up. So this allows [warehouses and fulfillment centers] to get the same amount of work done with half the labor."
Across the industry, warehouse automation vendors—including major players like Vecna Robotics, Mobile Industrial Robots (MiR), and InVia Robotics—are increasingly offering their robots on an RaaS basis, helping to bring bots into DCs of all sizes. By making those robots easy to "hire," simple to "train," and inexpensive to "rent," robotics-as-a-service has become a crucial tool for helping warehouse operators avoid getting snowed in by a blizzard of orders during the winter holiday rush.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."