Tariffs, technology, slowing economy drive 3PLs to adapt — again
2020 is shaping up as a uniquely challenging time for freight brokers and third-party logistics service providers. Those who can adapt may find opportunities aplenty.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
Third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) and freight brokers face another challenging year ahead. Among those challenges are the ongoing consequences of geopolitical events, the battle over tariff and trade policies, a global manufacturing and industrial sector that's tapping the brakes on output, new technologies disrupting traditional models, and difficulties in finding the next generation of logistics professionals—including truck drivers.
Above all else, shippers are looking to their 3PLs and brokers to be flexible, responsive, and creative in helping them overcome a myriad of supply chain challenges.
"There is an emphasis on supply chain agility, creating the ability to modify supply chains [quickly] to accommodate situational 'best cost,'" says Michael Labadie, global lead for automotive and industrial at Houston, Texas-based 3PL Crane Worldwide Logistics.
The impact of the trade war has been "increased cost pressure on transportation and increased focus on customs and importation practices," Labadie says, adding that as the tail end of 2019 approaches, demand for transportation and logistics services in North America and moving goods from China continues to soften. "I cannot emphasize enough that there are winners and losers in every change that is made in global trade," says Labadie. He believes 3PLs remain a key enabler that can help shippers sail through choppy trade waters and mitigate the worst impacts.
Jason Bergman is chief customer officer for Overland Park, Kansas-based YRC Worldwide and its logistics arm, HNRY Logistics. He agrees with Crane's Labadie that "supply chain flexibility is the most requested" capability sought by shippers today because of all the current market uncertainty. HNRY Logistics, Bergman says, specializes in "finding high-quality and consistent solutions" for customer supply chain needs. "The goal," he says, "is to create consistency and continuity" in any economic cycle.
HNRY Logistics is an "asset-backed" 3PL that has access to the capacity, coverage, and resources of its sister trucking units at YRC Worldwide. Bergman says the asset-backed model is a value differentiator. "At the end of the day, it's about consistent communication and a seamless experience for the customer. When you take our logistics arm and combine it with our assets, that provides a significant advantage," he says.
Going into the new year, what are three core issues that keep Bergman up at night? "Attracting and retaining quality talent. Managing our business in a time of economic uncertainty," and "managing in a more difficult regulatory environment," he says.
TOSSING OUT THE OLD PLAYBOOK
Flexibility and diversification are two qualities that Randy Sinker, vice president of commercial sales for Winnsboro, Texas-based 3PL Team Worldwide, says are critical to successful logistics service providers. "If you are a traditional freight forwarder and you don't diversify and become more flexible, you will go out of business," he says.
He cites the uncertainty of tariff and trade policies as well, which have made manufacturers reluctant to pursue investment and growth plans, and have reduced freight volumes, particularly air freight. Shippers also continue to embrace vendor consolidation strategies, winnowing down their list of suppliers to small teams of highly skilled and resourced core logistics suppliers. All of that means a 3PL's service portfolio has to stand out and demonstrate an ability to consistently solve an ever-growing list of supply chain challenges if the company hopes to stay in the game. "It's expensive [for shippers] to use different companies," says Sinker. "Those that can do more [for the shipper's supply chain] and who can think outside of the box will remain competitive and successful."
He adds that shippers, while still requiring competent performance of tactical logistics tasks, increasingly want strategy help. Sinker believes it's imperative for 3PLs to be able to "plan with customers for what's [expected to] happen a year from now, not [just] tomorrow's shipment."
Privately held Team Worldwide operates under the "agency" model, which Sinker believes is a unique strength. The company covers a broad swath of the supply chain: import/export ocean and air, customs brokerage, warehousing and distribution, and final mile. Sinker says chief among its strengths is an entrepreneurial culture, with each station having local ownership and control. "We tell customers we're large enough to service you and small enough to know you," he adds.
Unlike larger 3PLs, which are leaving smaller cities and consolidating operations in regional offices, Team Worldwide is expanding into secondary and tertiary markets, complementing its presence in key metro areas. The company has opened eight new offices in the last 22 months, currently has over 45 local branch offices within North America, and has additional expansion plans on the drawing board for 2020. "The biggest thing we push is service," says Sinker, citing the value of a flat organization with minimal bureaucracy and red tape. Decisions on operations and customer service are made "where the rubber meets the road at the branch level, with the branch owner."
THE VISIBILITY CHALLENGE
In addition to the strategic challenges, 3PLs and brokers face constant pressure on the technology front. The emergence of new tech providers such as Uber Freight, Convoy, and others hawking new digital brokerage platforms and visibility solutions has forever changed the logistics market—and forced traditional players to evolve and adapt.
That means a 3PL's or broker's tech platform has to be able to tap into—or otherwise effectively interact with—multiple transportation sources, management systems, order platforms, and online marketplaces. Industry executives say they're consequently faced with tough decisions about how to upgrade and modernize their technology platforms to support these new systems, which are becoming ingrained in normal supply chain operations. "If you don't, you'll be left behind," says one executive.
Geoff Turner, founder and chief executive officer of Preston, Maryland-based 3PL and freight broker Choptank Transport, is familiar with this dilemma. Turner says Choptank's top request from customers is for visibility into their loads—including where they are en route and if they'll meet the projected ETA. That's been a challenge, especially in a fragmented truckload market where some 80 percent of capacity is provided by thousands of "micro" carrier fleets of 10 or fewer trucks and independent owner-operators.
Like many progressive brokers and 3PLs, Choptank has been methodically investing in and improving the technology tools and capabilities his customers and carrier-partners want. In a given year, Choptank will engage with some 30,000 trucking service providers. To help customers navigate this complexity, Choptank deployed a visibility solution from Reston, Virginia-based Trucker Tools, which has increased carrier visibility compliance from less than 30% to consistently between 90% and 95% of loads, according to Turner.
"Those I speak with say not many [brokers and 3PLs] are seeing tracking success at this level. It's a benefit that goes directly to our customers and solves one of their most pressing needs," he says.
Logistics has always been an evolving and competitive space, with technology continually pushing the boundaries. But as Turner sees it, technology is not the whole story. One area where he says traditional brokers still have a value advantage is the tribal knowledge and expertise of skilled, experienced people, and the relationships they maintain with the carrier community.
"When there is an issue, they [carriers] really want to talk with someone," especially when exceptions come up or an issue arises at the shipper's dock. "It's that ability to [get on the phone with someone and] quickly resolve an issue" that might otherwise delay the driver or potentially cause harm to the shipper's supply chain. "Carriers are our customers too, and they want to work with people they know, trust, and like," so the personal connection, especially for managing exceptions and solving urgent issues, still makes a difference, Turner says.
EMERGENCE OF "MARKETPLACE SYSTEMS"
Greg Aimi, research vice president with Gartner Inc., has trod the logistics business's winding path for nearly 30 years, running software companies, managing logistics operations, and studying the market as a research analyst. He sees this most recent revolution of digital transportation platforms diverging into two models.
In one model, companies are essentially "coming up and saying your people-based [approach] is unnecessary. The whole process can be automated." These tech platforms, Aimi believes, are disintermediating the traditional broker. They are licensed brokers who are "allowing demand to source supply through their network. I can connect the parties automatically ... and let the constituent parties work together directly." In this case, the "platform" is doing the transaction.
In the other model, companies are essentially taking the current traditional brokerage model and automating the process of freight matching, booking capacity, and tracking loads. Aimi describes these as "marketplace systems," which engage multiple carriers and brokers, "enabling platforms where the constituents are doing the transactions themselves" and carriers are working on the platform with brokerage houses "to quickly provide [and secure] quoted capacity."
He notes that one of the biggest benefits to a carrier of this third-party multiparty platform model is a one-to-many relationship. "As someone [a carrier] who has capacity, I can put myself on many networks, but I prefer this [multiparty, multibroker] one because it is low cost, it's more lively, and I get [automated] matching of supply and demand" that can be refined and targeted to a specific geography, city, lane, or type of load, he explains. In this case, the parties themselves still participate in the transaction but with the support of automated, intelligent systems. It's also easier and less time-consuming for the carrier to manage versus being on multiple single-use platforms.
He says it is an enabling marketplace of supply and demand in which small to mid-market brokerage players can jump on the platform and have the same technology power as the big digital guys, but still with the benefit—and advantage—of what Aimi calls "customer touch."
The network is the "big deal," Aimi says. But when it's all said and done, for traditional brokers and 3PLs, "customer touch will [continue to] make them different."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."