David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
Hanko Kiessner is founder and chief executive officer of Packsize International LLC, a privately held on-demand packaging manufacturing and technology company. A native of Germany, Kiessner studied at the University of Utah, where he earned undergraduate and graduate business degrees.
Kiessner's packaging roots run deep. His father first introduced corrugated material into the European market in 1969 as part of a family business founded in 1872. In Germany, Kiessner returned a small printing business to profitability and was an executive with Skanwell, a supplier of corrugated board. Hoping to expand the marketing opportunities for corrugated material, Kiessner started to experiment with newly patented corrugated converting machines.
He relocated to Salt Lake City and founded Packsize in 2002, positioning the company to provide converting machines, z-Fold corrugate, technical support, and design and engineering expertise as a complete turnkey solution with no equipment purchase required. He sought to achieve sustainable operations early on and continues to be a strong advocate for the reduction, re-use, and recycling of packaging materials, while placing great importance on building sustainability into every aspect of his company's operations.
Packsize is consistently ranked among the Inc. 5000 top-performing private businesses and Deloitte's Technology Fast 500. In addition, Forbes has named Packsize one of America's Most Promising Companies. Ernst & Young recognized Kiessner with its 2008 Entrepreneur of the Year Award in the Manufacturing and Distribution category for the Utah region.
Kiessner recently spoke with DC Velocity Editorial Director David Maloney.
Q: How would you describe Packsize to someone not familiar with your company?
A: Packsize enables the packaging of any product in the right-sized box, either through a fully or semi-automated solution combined with advanced software. Think of your online ordering experience. You order something and often receive it in a box that's too large and stuffed with excessive filling material, which you then have to recycle. If the retailer or manufacturer had used Packsize, your order would have arrived in a right-sized box that was about 40% smaller on average than the ones typically used.
In essence, this is what we do. Our customers gain the flexibility to create custom right-sized boxes, all while reducing material, labor, and shipping costs; increasing throughput; and simplifying box management in a sustainable manner.
Q: How do you view the current supply chain market for packaging?
A: With the constantly changing needs of the e-commerce industry, retailers are looking for new ways to streamline their supply chain—packaging is at the forefront. Excessive packaging continues to top the list of consumers' complaints about online shopping. They want guilt-free packaging that is more eco-friendly. In today's e-commerce marketplace with many different box requirements, retailers are actively seeking more efficient systems that are able to create right-sized cartons, on demand, in pace with production and picking operations, while using less corrugated material. Not only must this packaging be flexible and dynamic, but it must also be cost effective.
Q: What are the major benefits that you see in right-sized packaging?
A: What is the cost of not having the right-sized box? First of all, you use more material. You need more material to make a box that's too large. You are then shipping unnecessary air through the entire supply chain for the end-customer to open up the package and find all this additional volume and void filler that has to be removed. What happens if you don't add extra void fill to an oversized box? You have a good probability of items being damaged that then need to be returned. Now, you don't have a good delivery experience for the customer, and it tarnishes the image of the company that shipped that package. All of this adds up, and as we live in a more populated planet with fewer resources, we have to right-size every package that ships.
Q: Can smaller companies also benefit from right-sized packaging produced on demand?
A: Packsize is uniquely positioned through our full spectrum of advanced technologies to offer companies of all sizes the ability to integrate on-demand packaging solutions into their packaging lines. The appeal of the on-demand packaging concept is that we are able to grow with our customers.
The majority are using what we call Packaging-as-a-Service (PaaS), which eliminates the need for a large capital expense and an upfront machine purchase. This way, as their demand grows, we can offer more sophisticated and automated technology without their having to purchase a new system. Through our automation portfolio, we can now offer small companies machines with a small footprint and electrical requirements, such as our iQ series. Then, as they grow, we can move all the way up to our fully automated X7, which can make, pack, and ship 1,200 right-sized orders per hour.
Q: Most people think of corrugated as something that's just thrown away after its initial use. Environmental issues are very important to you. How do you change that mindset?
A: Most people don't realize that corrugated is the most sustainable and affordable packaging choice available on the market today. In 2018, 96% of all corrugated produced in the U.S. was recovered for recycling, and the average corrugated box contained 50% recycled content. Think of this in comparison to plastic, which generally ends up in a landfill, as 91% of all of the plastic ever created has never been recycled. And if the plastic is recycled and repurposed, there can be unintended consequences, such as the release of microplastics into our environment.
In the facilities of current Packsize customers, the corrugated reduction amounts to more than several thousand cubic metric tons saved on an annual basis (~3.7 CBMs is equivalent to ~1,000 trees). A right-sized box produced by a Packsize on-demand packaging system also derives from proprietary z-Fold corrugated stock, a 97% recyclable material. By removing the air in the box, customers reduce the carton size, often by more than 40%. This translates to 60% less void fill, a 20% reduction in corrugated, and the reduction of 25 tons of CO2 for every 1 million square feet of corrugated saved.
Q: How has e-commerce affected the need for companies to improve their packaging?
A: There are multiple factors driving the desire for improved e-commerce packaging. It is simply no longer in the best interest of any company to ship oversized packaging and continue to ignore the large scope of the problem. Our research indicates that the number-one customer complaint about e-commerce is excessive packaging. That is what companies should be working on first, before they solve any other problem, if they consider themselves customer-driven. It is not a secret anymore that 26% of the corrugated used in packaging today is unnecessary. There are 5.8 million tons of paper that are used to make boxes that are too large.
A second factor is cost. All this waste is costing a lot of money, so on average, between 20% and 25% of packaging and packaging-related expenses can be saved.
A third factor is a lack of labor resources. Most markets today suffer labor shortages. I'm hearing about a lot of fulfillment centers being down on employees, and that means more automation is now necessary. The perfect packaging is now available with zero labor, and fully automated systems operate at speeds of up to 1,200 boxes per hour. Those are efficiency gains that companies can no longer overlook.
One of the last big pressure areas is actually throughput through buildings or fulfillment acceleration. With on-demand packaging solutions, you're impacting your upstream and downstream parts of the supply chain, where now you can fit 18% to 20% more parcels or orders through the same fulfillment center.
Q: I see the sustainability benefits of using eco-friendly packaging, but what are the financial benefits?
A: The CFO is the one who can track all of the savings and benefits that a right-sized package made on demand is able to deliver. It starts with the material itself. If there is less material, there is less material cost. Eliminating filler material in a right-sized box equates to even more savings. Fully automated packaging activities can bring 80% to 90% savings in labor costs. To ship a perfect package is significantly less expensive because it weighs less and has less cube.
All of this results in tremendous savings, but what is the value of solving your number-one customer complaint? I would say for most brands, that would be an even higher number funneling up to the CFO than any of the other savings I just mentioned.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."