The volatility in the transportation market may leave shippers feeling more than a little seasick. A recent industry report offers suggestions for how to make it through these tumultuous times.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
The transportation market has been a volatile and stormy one these past few years, with shippers trying to weather a confluence of issues including rising rates, shrinking capacity, driver shortages, increasing government regulation, and greater demand for smaller, more frequent shipments.
Indeed, a recent report by researchers from Auburn University compares managing the transportation function to "living along coastal waters in perpetual hurricane season." The report, titled Logistics 2030: Navigating a Disruptive Decade, Year 1—Freight Transportation, presents the findings of research on what companies are doing to ride out the storm, according to Gail Rutkowski, executive director of the National Shippers Strategic Transportation Council (NASSTRAC), which was one of the main sponsors.
The report, which is part of a multiyear study on key aspects of logistics and supply chain management, is based on survey responses from 420 industry professionals as well as focus-group discussions and in-depth one-on-one interviews. (See sidebar for more on the study.) Based on these discussions, the researchers concluded that for many companies, navigating the storm will involve establishing a clear transportation strategy that incorporates outsourcing. Companies will also need to create a formal, structured plan for recruiting and developing transportation leaders and make thoughtful investments in emerging technologies, they added.
SILVER LINING
If there has been a silver lining to all these storm clouds, it's this: Companies are becoming increasingly aware of the strategic importance of transportation. Three-fourths of the survey respondents say transportation is a priority for their organization, and 89 percent expect that it will be a company priority in 2030. Similarly, although 40 percent of respondents currently believe that their C-level executives do not understand the transportation function, that number is expected to drop to 16 percent by 2030, according to the survey findings.
"Double-digit rate increases, risks of freight not moving due to capacity shortages, and increasing customer expectations for fast, consistent transportation service combined to create a transportation crisis that C-level executives could no longer ignore," says report author Brian Gibson, professor at Auburn University's Raymond J. Harbert College of Business. "When your corporate strategies are threatened by an essential function like transportation, you are compelled to learn more about it and pay more attention to it going forward. These C-level executives are becoming well-attuned to my mantra that you can develop, build, and market a great product, but if you can't get it to the customer, then your money and efforts have been wasted."
While transportation is becoming increasingly important, it is also becoming increasingly complex. The growing demand for smaller, more frequent shipments and for greater visibility of delivery status requires sophisticated tools and capabilities. It's perhaps not surprising, then, that respondents expect to outsource more of their transportation responsibilities in the decade ahead. Almost 70 percent projected that their use of outsourced transportation services would increase by 2030. (See Exhibit 1.)
As for which tasks they'll hand off, the report indicated that technology, operations, and regulatory compliance would be the most widely outsourced transportation activities. (See Exhibit 2.) "We're not doing anything directly like we used to with spreadsheets and analysis, we're handing all that over to 3PLs (third-party logistics service providers)," said one focus-group participant.
As their outsourcing activity ramps up, however, companies will need to grow their own capabilities with regard to vetting, selecting, and managing service providers. The report also suggested there will be some changes in the way they manage their 3PLs. While review meetings, key performance indicator (KPI) dashboards, and service scorecards will continue to be important, the report indicates that the use of onsite representatives—where service provider representatives work directly in the customer operations or customer representatives work directly at the service provider's operations—will increase by 50 percent.
BUILD YOUR BENCH
Regardless of how they structure their outside partnerships, it's clear that companies will require in-house transportation expertise in the coming decade. However, filling those jobs will continue to be difficult as competition for top talent intensifies. Gibson believes there are currently not enough transportation professionals available who could step into the shoes of today's leaders if they were to retire or change jobs. "There's a great deal of technical transportation knowledge and savvy that will be difficult to replace," he says.
To complicate matters, most survey respondents believe it takes more than just technical skills and experience to be an effective transportation leader. It also requires strong skills in problem solving, communication, and analysis, they say. (See Exhibit 3.) However, 40 percent of survey participants said this combination of analytical skills, leadership capabilities, and transportation expertise is either "rarely available" or "not available" in the marketplace today.
This means that companies will have to devote significant time and resources to training and development. No longer can they rely on on-the-job training; instead, they must establish formal, structured leadership training programs, according to the report. But nearly all of the survey respondents agree that their current training programs are lacking, with 94 percent saying they will have to revise their development programs to better attract and retain talent. Indeed, fewer than 30 percent of companies currently have a formal structured training program, although there are signs others are starting to fall in line. More than 55 percent of the respondents say they will likely have a formal transportation management talent-development program in place by 2030.
EXCEL WON'T DO
For companies looking to stormproof their operations, developing a championship-caliber leadership team won't be enough, however. They also have to give their people the right tools. "The more complex the freight market and customer requirements become over the next decade, the more companies will need strong technology to manage transportation planning and operations," Gibson says. "Legal pads, maps, and Excel spreadsheets just won't do in the current and future transportation environment."
For years, the "go-to" application for transportation managers has been the transportation management system (TMS), with its suite of planning, execution, and control applications. Seventy percent of survey respondents use TMS for carrier selection, cost analysis, performance measurement, and visibility, while a smaller number use the software for labor planning, event management, requirements forecasting, and analytics. In spite of the widespread use, the software does not receive rave reviews, according to the report. The majority of respondents rated their TMS tools as only moderately or minimally effective for such tasks as cost analysis. Those shortcomings notwithstanding, survey respondents say they intend to expand their use of all TMS capabilities.
At the same time, they're keeping an eye on emerging technologies that promise to drive operational gains. According to the survey, 87 percent of respondents think next-gen technologies will fundamentally change transportation operations, although the timetables will vary. For example, respondents believe that advanced analytics and the Internet of Things (IoT) have a high potential to upend transportation operations in the next three years, and that blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) have significant "disruption potential" over the next five years. (See Exhibit 4.) On the other end of the spectrum, "Logistics 2030" respondents are not convinced that driverless trucks are coming in the near future, Gibson says. They predict it will be 10 years or more before the market sees significant implementations.
"That's quite a departure from the hype that we've been hearing in the popular media over the last three to five years," Gibson says.
While respondents were excited about the potential of emerging technology, their optimism was tempered by realism—and an awareness of obstacles they face. For instance, 61 percent said they did not have adequate funding to support a major technology initiative, and 82 percent believe there's a significant risk that heavily hyped technology will not achieve the promised benefits.
FIVE STEPS TO GET AHEAD
Transforming transportation management to meet the demands of a new world order will not be easy, but the report has five common-sense suggestions to help companies get there. They are as follows:
1. Establish coherent, data-driven plans. Managing transportation via intuition and a day-to-day firefighting approach will no longer cut it.
2. Strengthen key relationships. The balance of power currently lies in the hands of the carriers. To get reasonable rates and guaranteed capacity, shippers will have to don their sales hats and sell themselves to potential carriers and third-party logistics service providers.
3. Give transportation a seat at the "adult" table. In a world where speed is a priority, it's imperative that C-level executives acknowledge the key role played by transportation and include it in corporate strategic planning efforts.
4. Adopt 21st-century technology. Companies can no longer base key decisions on spreadsheets and instinct; instead, they need sophisticated analytics capabilities and tools that can provide visibility and insight into what's happening in the supply chain right now.
5. Show transportation professionals the money (and respect). To attract and retain people with the right skills, companies must commit to recruiting, developing, and properly compensating top transportation talent.
The way forward may be tough going, but if anyone knows how to ride out a storm, it's transportation and distribution professionals. As corporate leadership wakes up to the critical nature of transportation, the function will likely command the resources and attention it needs to address these challenges.
"One happy takeaway [from the study] is that companies are finally allowing the transportation functions a seat at the table and are including them in their supply chain strategy," Rutkowski says. "Too often in the past, transportation was left out or brought in too late to be an active contributor. The recent 'perfect storm' or transportation disruption was one of the catalysts for this change."
About the study ...
Logistics 2030: Navigating a Disruptive Decade is a multiyear study conducted by the Center for Supply Chain Innovation at Auburn University's Harbert College of Business, the National Shippers Strategic Transportation Council (NASSTRAC), the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly, and DC Velocity, and sponsored by the transportation spend management company TranzAct Technologies Inc. The goal of the study is to "assess the strategies, requirements, and tools that will shape supply chains and drive success over the next decade." In 2018, the first year of the study, the researchers looked at freight transportation. Next year's study will address warehousing and distribution. The report can be downloaded from DC Velocity's website, or purchased in hard-copy form for $25 at NASSTRAC's website.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."