In the effort to become a "shipper of choice," warehouses are turning a new eye on their yard management practices. If you want to secure scarce trucking capacity, here's what works.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
Moving goods between DCs, stores, and suppliers is an expensive operation, and turbulent market conditions of recent years have pushed the price tag even higher, putting renewed importance on running an efficient freight yard.
Many shippers have spent the past year wooing fleets and independent truckers in a historically tight market, trying to secure the trailer space to ensure their freight is moved on time. Studies show the capacity crunch has eased in recent months, but trucks are still a hot commodity, thanks to an expanding economy, a shortage of drivers, and stricter enforcement of hours-of-service (HOS) limits through electronic logging devices (ELDs).
Those factors have focused a spotlight on dock and yard management, as warehouses strive to reduce their truck waiting and turnaround times and become a "shipper of choice."
But is improving dock and yard management more of an art or a science? Industry leaders say it's a little of each and prescribe a combination of technology and good old-fashioned hospitality.
"We want carriers to have a smooth, seamless flow into and out of facilities, but for years, the facilities have underestimated the challenge," says Rick Blasgen, president and CEO of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). "Industry needs to do a better job of keeping goods flowing and keeping trucks moving."
The modern supply chain has access to technologies like global positioning system (GPS) tracking and radio-frequency identification (RFID) that allow businesses to know exactly "where their stuff is." But while that is a definite improvement over the mere estimates of previous decades, technology can't solve everything. "You also have to treat drivers well. Give them a bathroom or a break room, so they can rest a bit," Blasgen says.
TIME IS MONEY
In an effort to improve interactions between shippers and carriers, CSCMP recently created the "Strategic Shipper Program" through its National Shippers Strategic Transportation Council (NASSTRAC) division. The voluntary program, which was created in response to industry feedback about scarce capacity and rising freight rates,requires participating shippers to follow a particular code of conduct in managing their carrier and supplier relationships.
Dock411's app for drivers and shippers
One of the program's main goals is to help reduce truckers' turnaround time at shippers' facilities through the use of Dock411, a dock information app provided by a St. Charles, Ill.-based software developer of the same name. The platform allows shippers to upload videos, photos, and info on gate policies and average wait times at specific facilities, which drivers can then access via a smartphone app prior to their arrival.
"A driver can see when he's 10 minutes away which gate or which door to go to, and receive that information while he's on his way," Blasgen says. Other helpful information might include the location of security checkpoints, pictures of signage at the facility, or even warnings about potholes. Some facilities post enlarged quick-response (QR) bar codes on signs outside their yards, which truckers can scan to get instant information on that facility.
"If you've ever been to one of those big industrial parks, it can be confusing," Blasgen says. "But when you're hauling a 53-foot trailer, you don't want to be confused" since it can be tough to find enough space to turn the vehicle around.
Basic communication can go a long way toward getting drivers in and out faster, agrees Mark LeGrand, vice president of sales at Dock411. What drivers really want to know is the "basic blocking and tackling," he says. "It's about the last 500 to 1,000 feet: how to get to your facility, how to get onto the yard, who to talk to at the guardhouse, and what amenities there are on site—or close by—if they're going to be there for several hours."
The end goal, he adds, is to get drivers back on the road as quickly as possible. "From a driver's standpoint, miles are money," LeGrand says. "And the longer they're detained, the longer they're not earning money."
BRINGING DOCK OPS UP TO SPEED
4SIGHT's Connect Digital Master Control Panel
In the meantime, many facilities are making a fresh effort to tighten up operations and cut turnaround times, often by installing yard and dock management systems, says Rhonda Reece, senior business analyst and scrum master, Entrematic Loading Dock Americas, at 4Sight Yard & Dock Management, a unit of access-solutions conglomerate Assa Abloy that offers yard, warehouse, and loading-dock solutions. In that regard, she notes, they're making up for lost time in a sector that has seen transformative change inside the warehouse—ranging from the introduction of robotics to the implementation of warehouse management software—but very few changes outside in the yard just a few feet away, she says.
With better management tools, facilities can take basic steps to speed up yard processes, such as pre-staging a dock to make sure it's ready to handle a truck as soon as it arrives. That and other tactics can help them get trucks in and out as quickly as possible, minimizing the impact on drivers' hours-of-service time, she says.
As for what features buyers should look for in a good yard and dock management system, Reece puts ease of use at the top of the list, since many of the people using the product aren't accustomed to navigating software menus. "You need easier ways to get people to enter things into the system without making mistakes—like scanning QR codes—because once you enter something wrong, that information populates throughout the ecosystem," she says.
Other useful features include a trucker check-in system, the flexibility to customize processes for specific sites, documentation of arrival and departure times to avoid detention fees, and the ability to integrate with other software platforms, she says. The company plans to add all of those features to its 4Sight Connect products, coming in the fourth quarter of 2019 and first quarter of 2020, she says.
Data integration is a key factor in improving the flow of freight, agrees Jarrett Leesch, vice president of business development at Inconso, a unit of German logistics technology provider Körber AG that sells yard management systems (YMS).
The best YMS products allow truckers to reduce time spent in the yard by pre-booking arrival and loading times, while also giving shippers updates on truck arrival times for scheduling and staging purposes, Leesch adds. "Visibility is the key to bringing the two sides together," he says.
REPUTATIONS MATTER
Turning to the hospitality part of the equation, experts agree that a big part of improving dock and yard management is extending basic courtesies to drivers and treating them with respect.
As simple as that might sound, many facilities fail to meet even that basic standard, Dock411's LeGrand says. He notes that certain industry sectors have become notorious among truckers for their treatment of drivers. "Google around, and fair or not, the grocery industry is getting a black eye," LeGrand says. "[Drivers] don't want to go [to grocery DCs] because detention times can be over four hours—the ELD data backs that up. ... So drivers feel it's cost-prohibitive to even go there."
It's not just lengthy detention times that can earn a facility a bad rap. Another common cause of driver discontent is the failure to provide basic amenities, LeGrand says, citing the example of a facility that bans drivers from using a bathroom during their visit because of security regulations or health codes that apply to food-processing operations.
But restoring a tarnished reputation can be surprisingly simple, LeGrand says. He cites the case of one Dock411 customer that had prohibited drivers from exiting their vehicles because of safety concerns about pedestrians wandering the yard. It solved the problem by buying a $100 picnic table from a big-box store and setting it up under a tent canopy, creating a makeshift break room that gives drivers a place to safely get out and stretch their legs. In another case, a DC whose rules prohibited truckers and other visitors from using bathrooms inside the building solved the problem by installing a portable toilet right at the guardhouse.
Not all problems are so easily solved, of course. It's much more challenging to bring order to a chaotic yard than to install a picnic table. But with today's technology tools—and maybe a portable toilet—shippers can boost their chances of securing the capacity they need and facilitating a seamless flow of freight through their facilities.
When that happens, everybody wins. "Looking at the overall shipping community, time is money," LeGrand says. "At the dock, every minute counts, and it impacts somebody's bottom line."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."