Victoria Kickham started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for DC Velocity.
Demand for a more efficient supply chain is shining a light on today's warehouse operations, a trend that's sparking interest in alternative power solutions for industrial trucks. Of those alternatives to the traditional lead-acid battery, one in particular—the lithium-ion battery—has captured the market's attention.
Experts say productivity is at the heart of the issue, as fleet managers look for ways to work smarter and maximize equipment uptime. But industry adoption of lithium-ion batteries is still far from widespread, as higher acquisition costs and other factors make the technology suitable mainly for operations running large forklift fleets and/or making heavy use of their equipment.
Still, interest is growing, and battery makers say alternative power solutions will soon see wider adoption. That's why they're stepping up to the plate with solutions designed to "take away the pain points" customers are experiencing, explains Harold Vanasse, senior director of marketing, motive power Americas, for Reading, Pa.-based battery power solutions provider and battery manufacturer EnerSys, which showcased its new line of NexSys iON lithium-ion batteries and accessories at this spring's ProMat trade show in Chicago. He emphasizes the ever-present drive to become more productive, reduce downtime, maximize facility space, and minimize maintenance requirements.
"There's one thing driving this trend: the benefits the technology brings, especially its zero maintenance," Vanasse says of the rise of lithium-ion batteries, which unlike their lead-acid counterparts, don't require the labor-intensive process of watering. With lead-acid batteries, water inside the battery is consumed during operation and must be replenished. Staff must monitor batteries and water them on a regular schedule, a process that takes time, dedicated warehouse space, and equipment. Eliminating those requirements contributes to a more efficient and productive warehouse operation, lithium proponents say.
"That's the drive" behind today's battery innovations, Vanasse says.
ADVANCEMENTS IN TECHNOLOGY AND THE "WOW" FACTOR
You didn't have to walk too many aisles at the ProMat show to witness the growth in lithium solutions for material handling equipment. The biennial trade show highlights the newest innovations in manufacturing, distribution, and supply chain technology, and this year, dozens of manufacturers featured lithium batteries as well as equipment powered by lithium solutions. The sense of "newness" surrounding the products is bringing a "wow" factor to an industry that has seen little innovation in the last 100 years or so, industry experts say.
"[Lithium] signifies the advance of new technology in an industry that has been very traditional and has not seen much innovation," says Max Khabur, head of marketing for Irvine, Calif.-based lithium-battery maker OneCharge. "When there is something new to talk about ... it brings a lot of excitement and a new competitive angle to a very traditional industry."
Founded in 2015, OneCharge makes lithium-ion batteries for material handling equipment and offers more than 450 models for Class I, II, and III forklifts. Khabur compares the growing popularity of lithium power for material handling applications with the rise of electric cars and trucks: As lithium-battery technology has advanced and become broadly accepted in the consumer market, there's been increasing interest in applying it in the industrial sector, he says. The interest is fueling market growth: The overall lithium-ion battery market is expected to reach $93 billion by 2025, a 17-percent compound annual growth rate, according to a 2019 study by market research firm Grand View Research. Automobiles and other consumer electronics are expected to drive the bulk of that growth, but industrial and material handling applications will contribute as well, industry experts say.
"Just a couple of decades ago, [lithium] was still unheard of in this market," explains Khabur. "Now, the technology is evolving ... And, as with every new technology, there are more and more competitors."
"The newer technologies are certainly out there, with lithium being the buzzword [today]," adds Brian Faust, general manager for Reading, Pa.-based battery, charger, and accessories manufacturer Douglas Battery, which offers traditional lead-acid batteries and is also developing a sealed lead-acid product, expected to be available next year. Sealed lead-acid batteries offer similar benefits to lithium-ion solutions, including zero maintenance because they also don't need to be watered. "Probably over the next two or three years we'll see where [alternative power] settles down in our industry."
BENEFITS ABOUND, BUT QUESTIONS LINGER
Khabur and others agree that, today, lithium-ion batteries are best suited to operations where lift trucks are used for two or three shifts a day. Typical OneCharge customers have multiple pieces of equipment and are looking to get the most out of the vehicles during every shift, Khabur says.
"Our clients want to use the machinery with maximum efficiency," he says, pointing to the convenience and productivity-enhancing features of the technology as key selling points. Among other benefits, lithium-ion batteries charge faster and run longer than traditional solutions, eliminating the need to change a forklift battery at each shift, experts say. Their lifespan is also more than twice as long as their lead-acid counterparts'. And as Vanasse pointed out, they don't require watering, which eliminates the need for dedicated battery maintenance space and reduces labor requirements. The technology also helps reduce energy use because lithium-ion units use less electricity for charging, Khabur explains. On the downside, lithium-ion batteries still cost about three times as much as traditional lead-acid units, although the purchase price has come down in recent years. Khabur says that barrier will shrink as the technology evolves.
"Each year, we are [developing] new and more effective batteries," he says, adding that OneCharge sold 1,200 batteries in 2018 and hopes to double that in 2019.
Although the benefits and the newness of the technology will continue to garner attention for the products, questions linger over how quickly they'll move into widespread use. Experts point out that although both lithium-ion and sealed lead-acid batteries are maintenance-free in comparison to lead-acid batteries, they don't eliminate **ital{all} the maintenance associated with battery-powered material handling equipment. Lithium-ion batteries still require periodic inspection of cables, terminals, and the like, and forklifts themselves still require routine maintenance.
Battery end-of-life is also a sticking point. Virtually all lead-acid batteries are recycled by the manufacturer, a service included in the cost of the battery, according to Faust and others. In the United States, 99 percent of all lead-acid batteries are recycled, the highest percentage of any U.S. product, says John Connell, vice president of battery manufacturer Crown Battery's SLI Product Group. He adds that lead-acid battery makers largely rely on recycled lead to produce new batteries.
That's not the case with lithium-ion batteries, which are more complex and costly to recycle. Currently, lithium batteries are collected and recycled at a rate of less than 5 percent, according to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), which launched a program to boost the recycling rate earlier this year. In February, the DOE announced the opening of a battery-recycling center at Argonne National Laboratory in Chicago aimed at reclaiming and recycling critical materials from lithium batteries, with the goal of recovering 90 percent of key materials. In the meantime, the material handling industry is also researching the best end-of-life solutions, which include reuse and repurposing lithium-ion batteries for other energy needs, according to Khabur, who adds that OneCharge has a few batteries in the field that are nearing the end of their five-year warranty and may last well beyond it.
"If taken good care of and charged often, [these batteries] will last longer," he says. "And they can be repurposed. There may be many other uses. There is still much research and development [under way]."
IT'S ALL ABOUT PRODUCTIVITY
Regardless of how it all plays out, most experts agree that in the eyes of the end user, the technology inside the forklift doesn't really matter, as long as the product delivers the power to do the job efficiently and effectively.
"End users couldn't care less about what kind of battery is in their truck," Khabur says. "It's not a crucial detail for their business. What matters when they are looking for a solution [is that] it delivers the promised benefits and does not require everyday maintenance."
Faust adds that when it comes to batteries, end users are most concerned about uptime—and cost.
"[Customers] want their batteries to run longer and require less maintenance because that increases productivity. But not everybody wants to pay for it," he explains, circling back to the higher initial costs of lithium-ion units and the resulting need to choose the solution that makes the most sense for a given application.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."