The rise of private fleets (and dedicated operations)
The desire for committed capacity, reliable service, and predictable cost has created a surge of interest in dedicated and private fleets. That will change the complexion of trucking over the next five years.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
When Sam Walton decided to launch his own private fleet back in the 1970s, it was to solve a uniquely specific problem: the inability or lack of desire on the part of commercial carriers to deliver goods to Walmart's mostly rural stores, which tended to be located far from established trucking routes.
Little did he know that some 50 years later, his business decision would be the seed from which would sprout one of the nation's largest private fleet operations, with more than 8,000 drivers, 6,400 tractors, and 60,000 trailers. Today, Walmart is the third-largest private carrier in North America and if ranked as a commercial for-hire carrier, would be among the nation's top 10 operators.
The issue Sam Walton was trying to solve five decades ago—access to and control of guaranteed truck capacity—still exists today.
It's exacerbated by the modern realities of today's e-commerce-driven and Amazon-influenced supply chains, which require much more short-haul, rapid-response fulfillment. Layer on top of that a robust economy driving record freight levels; an ongoing, worsening driver shortage; increasingly challenging city congestion and highway driving conditions; and rising operating and equipment costs, and you have a perfect storm impacting available capacity—and generating more and more interest in private and dedicated fleets.
For big retailers that are adding DCs, having a dedicated fleet can shrink the length of haul, says Greg Orr of truckload carrier CFI.
What's the primary incentive for establishing a private fleet, or contracting for a dedication operation?
"It's really about [access to] steady capacity to support the [shipper's] business and having better control over service," explains Greg Orr, executive vice president of U.S. truckload operations for TFI International and president of TFI's largest North American truckload unit, Joplin, Mo.-based CFI. "In some cases, it's also a more predictable model in terms of cost." Orr noted that his company runs both dedicated and for-hire irregular-route truckload operations for customers. And dedicated is growing.
"Especially the big retailers who have a big network footprint and are adding more and more DCs, it's shrinking the length of haul in their networks," he says. "A lot of people are putting eggs in the [dedicated] basket." And while there will always be a market for long-haul freight, "to keep drivers, you will see a lot more push toward regional plays. [Demand for dedicated and private fleets] will absolutely change the complexion of trucking over the next five years."
CHANGING FACE OF TRUCKING
Use of dedicated fleets will are rising, and will continue to do so for the next two to three years, says Satish Jindel, president of SJ Consulting.
The shift is well under way, notes Satish Jindel, president of SJ Consulting Group. According to his firm's research, from 2017 to 2018, there was a 10.4-percent decline in truck count for one-way truckload for the industry's top truckload operators. At the same time, truck count devoted to dedicated operations rose 6.6 percent. (See Exhibit 1.)
He cites two truckload carriers to illustrate the trend. "At U.S. Xpress, the number of trucks in one-way service was down 6.0 percent, while dedicated was up 10.7 percent. Similarly, at Marten Transport, one-way was down 12.2 percent, but dedicated was up by 28.5 percent," he says. "It's definitely the way the market is evolving, and as [current economic and market] conditions persist, we won't see this trend change for the next two to three years. And we'll see some dedicated operations converted to private fleets."
"If you have a large amount of freight, especially if it is concentrated, why not manage it yourself?" Jindel asks.
GOING PRIVATE
Although capacity considerations may be the driving force behind fleet launches, customer service and cost play into it as well. "[For private fleets,] transportation is integral to the overall view of product quality and satisfaction," says Gary Petty, chief executive of the National Private Truck Council (NPTC). "They're indistinguishable." And as shipping costs with for-hire carriers have skyrocketed in the past year, "more and more it's also about cost management," he says.
Petty believes that particularly in the ongoing battle for drivers—which is the real source of the capacity crunch—private fleets (and to some extent, dedicated contract operations) have a competitive advantage. He notes that private fleets pay higher wages and benefits. For example, published reports cite Walmart drivers earning average annual pay of about $87,500, with some longer-tenured drivers earning over $100,000. Other industry estimates peg the initial pay of a long-haul irregular-route commercial carrier driver somewhere between $55,000 and $60,000—although some of these jobs can reach six figures as well.
Private fleets also typically offer a more predictable work schedule, which is highly desired by drivers, and they're able to get home to their families on a more regular basis, all of which contribute to a better work-life balance. They also tend to stay with their employers longer. Petty cites a study the NPTC did last year that revealed that the private fleet driver-turnover rate was about 14 percent annually, whereas the driver-turnover rate for commercial over-the-road truckload carriers was 94 percent. The average tenure of a private fleet driver is 10 years, the study noted. Lastly, Petty says the NPTC's research found that private fleet drivers are generally three times safer than commercial industry drivers as a whole.
"They stick with their company," Petty noted of private fleet drivers. "The driver becomes a permanent part of the team, the face and personality of the company. That's a tremendous upsell value to the customer."
Private fleets do come with risk, says Bart De Muynck of the market research firm Gartner.
Bart De Muynck, research vice president for transportation technology at market research firm Gartner, agrees that demand for private fleets and dedicated operations is on the upswing, echoing the strategic advantages and potential benefits outlined by the NPTC's Petty and others. But, says De Muynck, even with the lure of guaranteed capacity, private fleets do come with some risk. It's a lot more than just buying trucks, hiring drivers, and sending them on their way.
"You need an entire dedicated organization that can procure the equipment, design the network, do the scheduling and routing, and manage all the aspects—maintenance, safety, HR, regulatory compliance, and driver recruiting and retention," he says. Essentially, it's establishing and running an in-house carrier, which may not be a core competency for a company whose primary business is making and selling products.
"If you are not that specialized [in transportation operations] and don't have the expert personnel and resources to manage it, you run the risk of exposing yourself to higher costs," De Muynck says.
A LOWER-RISK OPTION
One way to mitigate those risks—and achieve the goal of guaranteed capacity—is by setting up a dedicated contract carrier operation with a fleet or a third-party logistics service provider (3PL).
In this model, all of the aspects of managing and running the fleet are handled by the contractor, who may also provide additional services such as network design and optimization to help the client come up with the most efficient dedicated solution for its operating footprint. Often, a dedicated solution can provide the same benefits—guaranteed capacity and reliable service—as a private fleet, at roughly the same cost, but with less risk and direct investment on the part of the shipper.
Well-run fleets and dedicated operations have common characteristics, such as a strong safety focus and good management of fuel and personnel, says Andy Moses of Penske Logistics.
"The big dividing line is having responsibility for your operating authority or not," explains Andy Moses, senior vice president of global products at Penske Logistics, which has a large presence in the dedicated market. "If you are private and operating under your authority, you are responsible for insurance and safety. A dedicated solution tends to offer a similar level of control as a private fleet but turns the operating authority and responsibility completely over to the [contracted] carrier [or 3PL]."
Well-run fleets and dedicated operations tend to have common characteristics, Moses points out. "A strong focus on safety. Good control and management over fuel and personnel. A high percentage of loaded miles. Ongoing dialogue around KPIs [key performance indicators]. And they are metrics-driven," he says. For Penske, that's led to a certain amount of crossover among customers, according to Moses. "We recognize that customers for various reasons want to play back and forth across the spectrum [of private versus dedicated]," he says. "Our approach has been to be that solution regardless of where they stand in that spectrum."
It's a similarly fluid picture over at Ryder System Inc., where nearly half of new dedicated business wins have been private fleets converted to the dedicated model, according to John Diez, Ryder's president of dedicated transportation solutions.
Speaking to the appeal of dedicated, he says a dedicated solution can help maximize savings and boost service levels, while giving the client access to up-to-date equipment and the expertise of a well-resourced dedicated provider. As an example, Diez notes that Ryder's customers can leverage its investments in modern fleet equipment with the latest safety technologies, its team of expert personnel, and a strong safety program and planning technologies that can help the shipper design the optimal dedicated operation. The overall package of capabilities represents an investment that shippers can leverage to secure a workable solution and gain the desired guaranteed capacity, at minimal risk, Diez says.
"When we talk about service, it's about securing capacity and having control so you can be assured you will deliver the product on time to the customer," Diez says. "Consistency in the network is the key."
David Scheffrahn is the North American vice president of sales at Ocado Intelligent Automation, a part of the technology specialist Ocado Group. Although he began his career focusing on robotic solutions for semiconductor, electronics, and automotive manufacturers, Scheffrahn eventually moved on to the logistics sector, where he worked at Rethink Robotics, Seegrid, Plus One Robotics, and Dexterity before joining Ocado in 2023. He holds a degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas.
Q: How would you describe the current state of the automation industry?
A: Today, automation is available for nearly every task in the supply chain. Yet we know from industry analysts that only one-fourth of warehouses are “automated.” [The market research firm] Interact Analysis predicts that 27% of warehouses will be automated by 2027.So many warehouse operators still have the opportunity to embrace and benefit from automation.
Whether companies are just getting started with automation and could benefit from swapping out manual carts for automated ones or are looking for an end-to-end omnichannel fulfillment solution, there will be options available.
Q: You’ve worked in the robotics industry for the past 25 years. What changes have you seen in robotic design and applications during that time?
A: Believe it or not, robots pre-date me! I fell in love with robots right out of college. When I graduated in 1994, I was hired by a local robotics company, and one of my early jobs was to program robots to cut circuit boards into the correct shape to fit into cellphone housings. I was hooked for life. Back then, robots did exactly what you programmed them to do, very precisely, over and over.
In the mid-2000s, an explosion of software and sensor-based technologies started to give robots the capability to operate in environments that are much less structured, such as warehouses and fulfillment centers. Nowadays, robots can perform a wide range of tasks and movements, seemingly on the fly. They can interact with the world around them—and even people—because they can safely operate and adapt to changes in the environment.
Q: How are artificial intelligence and machine learning being applied to robotics?
A: Think of a robotic pick arm. Traditionally, it was trained and tested to always pick the same—or very similar—object or item set. Now, when we apply artificial intelligence, vision systems, and sensors to the same robotic arm, it can teach itself to handle new items without previous training or testing. Vision systems and sensors scan shapes and identify items to direct the arm on how to handle fragile products without damaging them or how to grasp an item with a new and different shape.
Q: Automation used to be a major investment. Has it become any easier for smaller companies to get started with automation?
A: A few years ago, automating was a choice. In 2024, the question isn’t whether you should automate, but rather what’s the right automation solution for your operations. Automated solutions can be big or they can be small, but they should always improve warehouse operations and be “right-sized” for the application.
Autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) are some of the most approachable automated solutions available for 3PLs or small and mid-sized warehouses. AMRs can be deployed quickly one at a time or by the dozen. They can integrate seamlessly with existing warehouse systems and infrastructure, and work safely alongside human pickers. Customers we have worked with report that deploying automated carts based on AMRs has doubled their productivity, improved accuracy by 40%, and reduced employee training time by 80%.
Q: What is the next frontier in robotic design and applications?
A: The use of 3D printing is opening up new opportunities in robotic design. I think we’ll see that technique used more because of the resulting benefits.
Robots made via 3D printing are lighter, which, in turn, means the grids used in automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS)—like the Ocado Storage & Retrieval System (OSRS)—can be lighter. Lighter grids are easier and quicker to assemble. But more importantly, in Ocado Intelligent Automation’s solution, they can provide 33% more vertical storage capacity within the OSRS than heavier grids. The more cubic density in an AS/RS, the more warehouse operators can conserve footprint, lower real-estate costs, and scale inventory.
Q: How is Ocado Intelligent Automation expanding its offerings for the supply chain industry?
A: Ocado Group has been developing automated technology for more than 20 years. In 2023, it formed Ocado Intelligent Automation (OIA), the division I work in, to bring automation solutions to intralogistics (supply chain activities that take place within a warehouse) and to sectors beyond online grocery, which is where the company got its start.
Online grocery is one of the most demanding e-commerce environments—with needs that are very analogous to the fulfillment and logistics requirements of the health-care, retail, consumer packaged goods, and third-party logistics sectors. I can’t wait to see how these sectors benefit from OIA technology and robotics in the coming years. It’s going to be impressive!
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.