Boxcars to boardrooms: interview with Doug Sampson
Forty years ago, Doug Sampson took a summer job unloading boxcars at a public warehouse. He's still at the company today, but now he's senior vice president and partner.
Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
It's a familiar story by now: A college student gets into logistics and supply chain management on the ground floor, unloading trucks or stocking warehouse shelves during summer breaks. Though the work is demanding, he grows interested in the nuts and bolts of logistics operations, eventually abandoning his original career plans to pursue his newfound interest. He works his way up through the ranks, gaining experience in nearly every facet of supply chain management, to become an executive in the field.
In Doug Sampson's case, that story played out at Acme Distribution Centers Inc., an Aurora, Colo.-based third-party logistics and supply chain solutions provider. Sampson's story began when he took a summer job unloading boxcars at Imperial Distribution, one of the forerunners of Acme Distribution. In the four decades since, he has worked in every position in the company and almost every facet of the business, including supply chain planning and optimization, real estate, and quality management. Today, he serves as senior vice president of Acme, which operates facilities in Denver, Seattle, and Harrisburg, Pa. In addition to his day-to-day responsibilities, Sampson has been active in both local and national trade associations. His deeply rooted passion for supply chain excellence has been a part of his journey every step of the way.
Sampson spoke recently with DC Velocity Group Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald about his career path, the biggest logistics challenge he's ever faced, and why working in the industry is like being an offensive lineman in pro football.
Q: Tell us about your career journey. How did you arrive at the position you hold today?
A: It all started when I was in college. I was studying for a career in corporate finance and planned to work in my father's company. Like any kid in college, I needed money, which meant I had to find a summer job. I was playing football back then, so I was really hoping to find something physical.
As luck would have it, my dad had just completed a financing package on a couple of buildings for a client working in something called "public warehousing." He reached out to Leon Goldfogel at a company called Imperial Distribution [a forerunner of Acme Distribution] and the next day I was filling out an application. A day later I started work unloading boxcars of canned pet products. Although the work was grueling, my curiosity took hold and I began to wonder "why": Why are the cases sized like this? Who decides how they should be stacked and how high? And about a thousand other questions.
I continued working in the warehouse during summers and vacations while I finished up my degree in finance and marketing. Upon graduation, I told my dad that I was going to stay and work there in management and learn more about this industry I had became so intrigued with. Today, I am a partner in the company.
Although I can say I've really only had one job per se, I've had the pleasure of working with folks from over 1,200 companies across all walks of commerce.
Q: Could you describe your operation for us?
A: We are a multiregional 3PL with close to 3 million square feet of operations, a truck fleet of about 50 units, and a full-service brokerage. Our world is a little different in that our client base is quite large, with over 400 customers, and also quite diverse, with 18 different industry verticals and with about 30 percent engaging in omnichannel operations.
It forces us to be a "master of all trades," which requires good processes, great execution, continuous improvement, lean applications, and agile and dedicated work teams. We deal with everything, as long as it's legal, and those rules are changing too, as is the case with marijuana these days.
Q: Which of your skills serve you best in the work you do each day?
A: I often make an analogy that working in our industry is like being an offensive lineman in pro football. If you do your job right, nobody notices. However, if you miss a block or take a penalty—or in logistics, make a shipping error—everyone notices. The accolades are infrequent, and the sanctions can be painful.
To succeed in this business, I believe you need to have a positive attitude, a thirst to continuously learn and then improve, and discipline. You also need to be persistent, show determination, and be able to solve problems. It helps to surround yourself with associates and mentors to help you improve your skills.
Q: What are the biggest challenges you face in achieving logistics excellence?
A: First would be people. Recruitment and retention has changed dramatically since the days I entered the industry, and it remains important today.
Next would be keeping up with all the systems and technologies that have come online and knowing when to pull the trigger for an implementation or upgrade. In our world, where our client base is so diverse, one of the biggest challenges is to figure out how to utilize a specific technology like AI [artificial intelligence] across multiple platforms or customers in a way that provides a reasonable return on investment.
Third is responding to the ever-increasing pace of the business. The window of execution has continued to shrink as our retailer, wholesaler, and consumer populations become more geared to immediate gratification: from next day, to same day, to two hours, to "I want it now."
Fourth would be our aging infrastructure, which hampers transportation efficiency by causing delays, lengthening transit times, and raising costs.
Finally, we are continually challenged by government laws, rules, and regulations that impede our execution and costing.
Q: What are some of the biggest changes you've observed in logistics operations over the past decade?
A: Well, there are the obvious advances in technology. Beyond that, the facilities themselves have changed; today's spec buildings are taller, better insulated, have better lighting, and feature more dock doors per square foot than used to be the case.
Then there are the increased regulations I mentioned earlier. Increased regulation usually results in increased costs.
Q: Despite all the changes in the industry over the years, would you say there are some basic principles of logistics excellence that have remained the same?
A: Yes. One is that when utilizing technology, you have to find the sweet spot where it increases accuracy and improves the process but does not limit or constrain productivity.
Another is to minimize travel, minimize movements, and combine movements wherever possible.
Q: What do you consider to be the biggest logistics challenge you have overcome in your career? What was critical to your success in that effort?
A: Back in the early 2000s, we received a contract to design a new supply chain network for a large electronics company. Long story short, we came up with a design that saved it $2 million annually. We were then awarded a contract to manage the full network, which involved rolling out 1.5 million square feet of space in five cities across the country in 90-day consecutive startups. We could not have done it without a total team effort at every level of our business.
Q: Any closing thoughts or comments for our readers?
A: In our world, there are numerous options for buildings, transportation, information systems, and the way we perform commerce. Yes, they are "must haves." Still, the companies that succeed today and will continue to succeed in the future are fundamentally based on people, aligned principles, and values. A solid foundation of trust, accountability and communication is required when we "miss a block" during our next "set of downs."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."