New-product launches come with a special set of delivery challenges. Here are some steps you can take to ensure your new product arrives on time and ready to roll.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
When manufacturers and retailers announce that a new product—an eagerly awaited mobile phone, for instance, or footwear endorsed by a famous athlete—will be available for sale on a particular date, consumers trust that they'll be able to buy that product on that day. But few, if any, of them understand what it takes to get those phones, sneakers, and other hot new products delivered and ready for sale everywhere at the same time.
What it takes is effective planning, coordination, and communication among shippers, motor carriers, and the third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) that direct the truckers as they deliver the new product to hundreds of locations within strict delivery windows. In consumer electronics, for instance, it's not unusual for carriers to be tasked with delivering 1,000 or more pallets of product and merchandising displays to an equal number of stores within a span of just one or two days.
Regardless of the industry or product involved, there's a lot any shipper can do to help carriers and 3PLs execute this complex choreography. Here are four recommendations.
1. Provide plenty of advance notice. New-product launches—whether large or small, national or regional—require flawless execution under tight deadlines. That's why giving carriers and 3PLs advance notice is so important. For a large-scale nationwide campaign, 90 days is ideal, says Jim Monkmeyer, president, transportation, for DHL Supply Chain. That allows enough time to get bids and negotiate rates and service levels with multiple motor carriers, and for the selected carriers to position the necessary equipment and personnel when and where they will be needed, he says.
In some cases, such as when the shipper and carrier have previously worked together and have an established procedure for rollouts, a month or even a week may be sufficient, says Matthew Bosko, senior logistics specialist and project manager with the Erie, Pa.-based 3PL Logistics Plus. Bosko leads the company's new-product rollout team, which specializes in managing deliveries of time-sensitive new products and merchandising displays. But in general, he says, "the more notice the better, so the motor carriers will have at least a rough idea of start dates, pallet quantities, delivery date requirements, and so forth." As the launch date nears, the shipper can update its forecast and instructions to the carriers as needed.
If the product is specialized in some way and requires new or different equipment than what's normally used, "then you would want to discuss that well in advance, because the carrier can't necessarily get that equipment overnight," advises Andy Moses, senior vice president, global products, for Penske Logistics. This is particularly important in times of tight capacity, he notes.
2. Clearly communicate requirements and expectations. Nobody can meet expectations if they don't know what they are. Carriers and 3PLs need to know exactly what the shipper requires in terms of delivery deadlines, locations, and procedures as well as service levels, responsibilities, and pricing. All of that is subject to discussion with all parties, of course; service providers will want to verify that they can meet those requirements before they sign on the dotted line.
In many rollouts, there will be new suppliers, new origin points, new customers, and new geographies, all of which affect outbound routing and will require careful advance planning by the carrier and 3PL, Monkmeyer points out. When new suppliers are involved, they should be included in discussions about shipping plans with the carrier and/or 3PL, he adds.
The experts we consulted recommend that shippers, carriers, 3PLs, and perhaps suppliers schedule regular calls to share progress reports and updates. Because product launches are anything but routine, the experts also suggest that the customer and carrier communicate more often than usual and establish a procedure for addressing problems well before the rollout.
Scott Frederick, vice president of marketing at Logistics Plus, offers one example of an out-of-the-ordinary delivery requirement that required clear advance communication. One of his company's customers, a national consumer electronics chain, had hired people to set up merchandising displays for a new product so it would be ready for sale on the same day at all of the retailer's stores. "They were going to have people ready and waiting to set that up on a specific day, so it was critical that we get to the local stores on time," he recalls.
There's universal agreement that the more information about the new product the motor carrier has in advance, the greater the likelihood that deliveries will go smoothly. Whether a product is brand-new to the market or only incrementally different from its predecessors, the carrier and 3PL need to know all the details, including how it differs from products they've handled for the shipper in the past, Moses says. For example, new products often have different packaging shapes and sizes from items the carrier has previously transported, which affects carton, case, and pallet size and weight as well as how much product can fit in a truck. "We need to properly document the new SKU's [stock-keeping unit] characteristics so when orders come along, we can build that load accurately," he explains.
One often-overlooked aspect of new products is the commodity's value. If a new product has a higher value than is typical of the shipper's products, it's important to convey that to carriers so they can determine whether their normal liability will cover the shipment, Frederick says.
3. Work with your providers to anticipate the new product's impact on operations and costs. Even small changes in things like routing, timing, volumes, and packaging can have a big impact on efficiency and costs. Sharing all of the product and shipment details with the carrier and 3PL allows them to advise the shipper on the likely impact as well as on mitigation strategies. If a new version of a product requires an increase in packaging size, for example, it might mean that fewer items can be loaded in a truck, requiring more trucks and thus raising freight costs.
Product launches can affect how people do their work too. "If the new product requires integration of a new activity with your existing network ... and the scope of work changes, then we will need to explain that to our drivers and supervisors," Moses says. Consider the example of medical supplies that used to be palletized for large weekly deliveries to hospital loading docks but now are delivered daily as loose cartons directly to nursing stations or storerooms inside the hospital. That's a significant change in drivers' jobs that would not only require training in the new procedures but also affect how much time they spend at that one location.
Shippers should also think about how potential problems might affect deliveries at different points in the supply chain and work with carriers and 3PLs to develop an action plan for handling such glitches. Monkmeyer has seen shippers order new products from overseas and assume they'll be able to whisk the goods through customs and on to stores the way they always do. However, "if it's the first time you're shipping from that country or from that supplier, that first load could end up sitting in port for two weeks while customs checks on it," he cautions. That will cause a major delay in the product's arrival in stores, of course. But the unforeseen change in timing could also result in further holdups down the road if the motor carrier is unable to shift its resources at a moment's notice when the shipment is finally released.
Motor carriers and 3PLs may need to acquire new transportation management software or modify their existing systems to accommodate large or frequent product rollouts, especially if customization of transportation plans, internal management processes, or billing is required. And if new suppliers are involved, then some type of technology integration could well be necessary.
4. Choose a partner with experience in handling new-product launches. New-product launches, with their demands for precisely timed deliveries to hundreds or thousands of far-flung locations in a tight time window, are not for amateurs. There can be advantages to working with motor carriers and 3PLs that have extensive experience meeting those specialized requirements. They have the people, processes, capacity, and systems in place to successfully carry out these uniquely challenging assignments. The dedicated new-product rollout team at Logistics Plus, for example, has standardized the way it gathers, documents, and shares information internally and with its core group of carriers. Each customer and product launch has unique requirements, Bosko notes, but the standardized process saves a lot of time while minimizing slipups and ensuring that everyone knows what's required.
The time-sensitive nature of product launches means there's no room for error when it comes to deliveries. Bosko, Penske's Moses, and Monkmeyer of DHL all stressed the importance of using motor carriers that thoroughly understand the specialized needs of this business segment and have consistently demonstrated reliable, on-time performance. Shippers that regularly roll out new products with non-negotiable delivery deadlines may want to consider dedicated contract carriage, where a 3PL provides dedicated equipment and personnel and manages the fleet for a customer, Moses suggests.
Whether shippers work with a 3PL or directly with motor carriers, the best outcomes occur when they give their service providers advance notice, communicate expectations, share detailed information, and work with them to anticipate how changes will affect operations and costs. Do all that, and those high-performance phones and hot new sneakers will be ready and waiting when the first customer walks through the door.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."