Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
Brainstorm the biggest trends to sweep through the logistics world in recent years and you might come up with the rise of e-commerce, the driver shortage, and the trucking capacity crunch. Think a little longer and you might add emerging technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), and autonomous vehicles. Dig a little deeper, and you might ... not be able to sleep tonight as you realize that the sector is being rocked by waves of transformation.
No one has the answers for the best way to weather this storm, but a new multiyear research initiative aims to offer some insights. Called "Logistics 2030—Navigating a Disruptive Decade," the project was launched to guide logistics and supply chain professionals through the uncertain times that lie ahead. Through a series of focus groups, online surveys, and interviews with industry executives, researchers hope to create an accurate portrait—warts and all—of the supply chain challenges we face and then develop recommendations and best practices.
These waters are too deep to chart in a single map, so the study will focus on a single aspect of the profession each year. In 2018, the inaugural year of the study, researchers looked at freight transportation. This year, the focus is on distribution and warehousing, with other topics to follow. The project is led by Brian Gibson, executive director at Auburn (Ala.) University's Center for Supply Chain Innovation; Gail Rutkowski, executive director of the National Shippers Strategic Transportation Council (NASSTRAC); Rick Blasgen, president and CEO of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP); and Mitch Mac Donald, president, CEO, and group editorial director at Agile Business Media.
Researchers shared the preliminary results of their deep dive into 21st century freight transportation challenges last fall in a panel at CSCMP's annual conference. They were joined by representatives from several major shippers, who shared stories about how they survived the stormy supply chain weather of 2018. And to no one's surprise, the first topic was the trucking capacity crisis.
COPING WITH THE CAPACITY SQUEEZE
Anyone who managed freight transportation in 2018 felt the pain of the capacity crunch, exacerbated by both the driver shortage and the initial fallout from the federal electronic logging device (ELD) mandate, according to panelists at the CSCMP event. The shortage sent shipping rates soaring, left loads sitting on docks waiting for a truck, and even stranded some cargo altogether, said John Janson, global logistics director at SanMar, an apparel and fashion retailer based in Issaquah, Wash.
"There has been an immense capacity challenge in the truckload industry, spilling down into the less-than-truckload (LTL) [sector] and moving all the way down into parcel. And I think it really has changed how we as a company go to market, how we contract with truckers, and how we deal with our carriers," Janson said. "For the past year, my domestic team has literally had their sales hats on; we're out calling on the carriers, saying 'Wouldn't you like to do business with SanMar? Here's why we'd make a great customer for you.' You want to be a shipper of choice."
SanMar's efforts to expand its carrier base haven't stopped there. "We've gone out to several of the conferences. Anywhere where there's been trucking companies, my team has been walking around with a sign saying 'We spend millions of dollars; will you be my friend?'" Janson said. "And for the most part, we're doing OK. But we're having to work a lot harder at it. Nobody's back here just tapping a button and booking loads."
As for other coping strategies in play, some shippers are stockpiling inventory across their DC networks in a bid to reduce their reliance on trucks, said panelist Russell Verhovec, senior vice president, supply chain, at Seal Shield, a Jacksonville, Fla.-based manufacturer of infection control devices and antimicrobial science products. Still others are fine-tuning their DC loading and unloading operations in an effort to get drivers in and out faster, or even outsourcing some transportation functions to a third-party logistics service provider (3PL), he said.
Another panelist noted that when it comes to managing transportation challenges, the venerable transportation management system (TMS) remains one of the most effective tools available today. "A robust TMS is still a good tool and a necessary tool for managing transportation operations, in everything from tendering [freight] to carriers to communicating delivery delays," said Terri Reid, director of transportation at Caleres Inc., an apparel and fashion retailer based in St. Louis, Mo. "But one caveat is it can't stand alone. It has to be integrated with all of your other visibility and operating systems in order to really be [effective]."
In the coming years, shippers expect to have more digital tools at their disposal. These include visibility dashboards with predictive indicators, blockchain data sharing to streamline business processes, and cloud-based software integration to simplify the adoption of the new technologies, the panelists said.
In fact, predictive visibility tools are already proving their value in some operations, according to the panelists. Verhovec cited Seal Shield's experience with them as an example. "When we were moving our first container from Taiwan to the U.S., we could tell that the ship was going to be delayed at the Panama Canal about seven days before it arrived in Jacksonville," he said. That advance knowledge enabled the company to take steps to mitigate the effects of the delay, he added.
WHAT'S ON THE HORIZON
In the meantime, the search for longer-term solutions is already under way, according to Auburn University's Gibson. As part of the Logistics 2030 study, researchers asked the respondents what next-generation technologies had the most potential to reshape freight transportation in the years to come. Participants identified the following four technologies:
Autonomous vehicles, which could go a long way toward easing the driver shortage. The relief won't be immediate, however, as experts say practical application of the vehicles is still at least five to 10 years out.
Internet of Things (IOT) applications, which have the potential to solve visibility issues, boost service quality, and address some of the challenges of controlling freight out in the field.
Artificial intelligence, which could automate some of the routine transportation decision-making and eliminate the need for staff members to stare at Excel spreadsheets to try to figure it all out. AI tools are expected to become widely available in three to five years.
Predictive analytics, which tell companies what is likely to happen based on historical data. As noted above, some businesses are already using these tools to cut costs and boost service.
These approaches all have tremendous potential, but it's important not to overlook the people element, Gibson said. To get the most from the new technologies, companies will need to have the right leadership teams in place, he said. "People realize that it's not just about drivers. ... You can't forget about your management team and your experts, who are going to do the analytics, who are going to work with all this data, who are going to manage it effectively," Gibson said. "We really need to bring in the right people and train them well over the course of their careers because it will have an impact on our supply chain performance overall."
As for what skills shippers will need as they "push up" into their new responsibilities, panelists pointed to a process mindset, attention to detail, and a can-do attitude. And at least one panelist underlined the need for a strong general business background.
"Transportation professionals today have to be good businesspeople," said Caleres' Reid. "You have to know the entire business; you can't just focus on transportation," she said. "You have to be good in the transportation discipline—you have to know your blocking and tackling—but you also have to be a good communicator and a good leader. Plus, you have to understand the business operations—accounting, budgeting, and forecasting."
Employers can do their part by investing in professional development programs, she said, noting that this might include sending new hires to industry conferences and arranging site visits to docks and DCs for office-based workers.
CHANGING CONDITIONS MOVE THE GOALPOSTS
Those investments in people and technology are crucial for businesses in all sectors because the challenges facing transportation professionals are certain to change between now and 2030, the study authors found.
"We've all been taught ... that change is constant and happens at an accelerating pace. We've watched this dynamic throughout our careers, but what is a little bit different and more intense here in 2018 is that pace part," Agile's Mac Donald said.
"If you take that concept of constant change and accelerating pace, and you marry it up to the technology we have today and the technology that will certainly be coming on tomorrow and the day after, then it starts to feel like Mr. Sulu hitting the button on the bridge of the Starship Enterprise and launching into warp speed. The pace of change is fast, and keeping up is going to be a permanent challenge."
Keep an eye on the Logistics 2030 study to get the latest insights from shippers and industry leaders on the best ways to meet that challenge. Oh, and you might want to buckle up ... it's going to be a bumpy ride.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."