Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
Brainstorm the biggest trends to sweep through the logistics world in recent years and you might come up with the rise of e-commerce, the driver shortage, and the trucking capacity crunch. Think a little longer and you might add emerging technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), and autonomous vehicles. Dig a little deeper, and you might ... not be able to sleep tonight as you realize that the sector is being rocked by waves of transformation.
No one has the answers for the best way to weather this storm, but a new multiyear research initiative aims to offer some insights. Called "Logistics 2030—Navigating a Disruptive Decade," the project was launched to guide logistics and supply chain professionals through the uncertain times that lie ahead. Through a series of focus groups, online surveys, and interviews with industry executives, researchers hope to create an accurate portrait—warts and all—of the supply chain challenges we face and then develop recommendations and best practices.
These waters are too deep to chart in a single map, so the study will focus on a single aspect of the profession each year. In 2018, the inaugural year of the study, researchers looked at freight transportation. This year, the focus is on distribution and warehousing, with other topics to follow. The project is led by Brian Gibson, executive director at Auburn (Ala.) University's Center for Supply Chain Innovation; Gail Rutkowski, executive director of the National Shippers Strategic Transportation Council (NASSTRAC); Rick Blasgen, president and CEO of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP); and Mitch Mac Donald, president, CEO, and group editorial director at Agile Business Media.
Researchers shared the preliminary results of their deep dive into 21st century freight transportation challenges last fall in a panel at CSCMP's annual conference. They were joined by representatives from several major shippers, who shared stories about how they survived the stormy supply chain weather of 2018. And to no one's surprise, the first topic was the trucking capacity crisis.
COPING WITH THE CAPACITY SQUEEZE
Anyone who managed freight transportation in 2018 felt the pain of the capacity crunch, exacerbated by both the driver shortage and the initial fallout from the federal electronic logging device (ELD) mandate, according to panelists at the CSCMP event. The shortage sent shipping rates soaring, left loads sitting on docks waiting for a truck, and even stranded some cargo altogether, said John Janson, global logistics director at SanMar, an apparel and fashion retailer based in Issaquah, Wash.
"There has been an immense capacity challenge in the truckload industry, spilling down into the less-than-truckload (LTL) [sector] and moving all the way down into parcel. And I think it really has changed how we as a company go to market, how we contract with truckers, and how we deal with our carriers," Janson said. "For the past year, my domestic team has literally had their sales hats on; we're out calling on the carriers, saying 'Wouldn't you like to do business with SanMar? Here's why we'd make a great customer for you.' You want to be a shipper of choice."
SanMar's efforts to expand its carrier base haven't stopped there. "We've gone out to several of the conferences. Anywhere where there's been trucking companies, my team has been walking around with a sign saying 'We spend millions of dollars; will you be my friend?'" Janson said. "And for the most part, we're doing OK. But we're having to work a lot harder at it. Nobody's back here just tapping a button and booking loads."
As for other coping strategies in play, some shippers are stockpiling inventory across their DC networks in a bid to reduce their reliance on trucks, said panelist Russell Verhovec, senior vice president, supply chain, at Seal Shield, a Jacksonville, Fla.-based manufacturer of infection control devices and antimicrobial science products. Still others are fine-tuning their DC loading and unloading operations in an effort to get drivers in and out faster, or even outsourcing some transportation functions to a third-party logistics service provider (3PL), he said.
Another panelist noted that when it comes to managing transportation challenges, the venerable transportation management system (TMS) remains one of the most effective tools available today. "A robust TMS is still a good tool and a necessary tool for managing transportation operations, in everything from tendering [freight] to carriers to communicating delivery delays," said Terri Reid, director of transportation at Caleres Inc., an apparel and fashion retailer based in St. Louis, Mo. "But one caveat is it can't stand alone. It has to be integrated with all of your other visibility and operating systems in order to really be [effective]."
In the coming years, shippers expect to have more digital tools at their disposal. These include visibility dashboards with predictive indicators, blockchain data sharing to streamline business processes, and cloud-based software integration to simplify the adoption of the new technologies, the panelists said.
In fact, predictive visibility tools are already proving their value in some operations, according to the panelists. Verhovec cited Seal Shield's experience with them as an example. "When we were moving our first container from Taiwan to the U.S., we could tell that the ship was going to be delayed at the Panama Canal about seven days before it arrived in Jacksonville," he said. That advance knowledge enabled the company to take steps to mitigate the effects of the delay, he added.
WHAT'S ON THE HORIZON
In the meantime, the search for longer-term solutions is already under way, according to Auburn University's Gibson. As part of the Logistics 2030 study, researchers asked the respondents what next-generation technologies had the most potential to reshape freight transportation in the years to come. Participants identified the following four technologies:
Autonomous vehicles, which could go a long way toward easing the driver shortage. The relief won't be immediate, however, as experts say practical application of the vehicles is still at least five to 10 years out.
Internet of Things (IOT) applications, which have the potential to solve visibility issues, boost service quality, and address some of the challenges of controlling freight out in the field.
Artificial intelligence, which could automate some of the routine transportation decision-making and eliminate the need for staff members to stare at Excel spreadsheets to try to figure it all out. AI tools are expected to become widely available in three to five years.
Predictive analytics, which tell companies what is likely to happen based on historical data. As noted above, some businesses are already using these tools to cut costs and boost service.
These approaches all have tremendous potential, but it's important not to overlook the people element, Gibson said. To get the most from the new technologies, companies will need to have the right leadership teams in place, he said. "People realize that it's not just about drivers. ... You can't forget about your management team and your experts, who are going to do the analytics, who are going to work with all this data, who are going to manage it effectively," Gibson said. "We really need to bring in the right people and train them well over the course of their careers because it will have an impact on our supply chain performance overall."
As for what skills shippers will need as they "push up" into their new responsibilities, panelists pointed to a process mindset, attention to detail, and a can-do attitude. And at least one panelist underlined the need for a strong general business background.
"Transportation professionals today have to be good businesspeople," said Caleres' Reid. "You have to know the entire business; you can't just focus on transportation," she said. "You have to be good in the transportation discipline—you have to know your blocking and tackling—but you also have to be a good communicator and a good leader. Plus, you have to understand the business operations—accounting, budgeting, and forecasting."
Employers can do their part by investing in professional development programs, she said, noting that this might include sending new hires to industry conferences and arranging site visits to docks and DCs for office-based workers.
CHANGING CONDITIONS MOVE THE GOALPOSTS
Those investments in people and technology are crucial for businesses in all sectors because the challenges facing transportation professionals are certain to change between now and 2030, the study authors found.
"We've all been taught ... that change is constant and happens at an accelerating pace. We've watched this dynamic throughout our careers, but what is a little bit different and more intense here in 2018 is that pace part," Agile's Mac Donald said.
"If you take that concept of constant change and accelerating pace, and you marry it up to the technology we have today and the technology that will certainly be coming on tomorrow and the day after, then it starts to feel like Mr. Sulu hitting the button on the bridge of the Starship Enterprise and launching into warp speed. The pace of change is fast, and keeping up is going to be a permanent challenge."
Keep an eye on the Logistics 2030 study to get the latest insights from shippers and industry leaders on the best ways to meet that challenge. Oh, and you might want to buckle up ... it's going to be a bumpy ride.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."