Wondering whether you can let the same lift truck roam both indoors and out? In some cases, the answer is yes—but plenty of restrictions apply. Here's what to keep in mind.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Every warehouse and distribution center (DC) seeks to optimize the size of its forklift fleet to ensure it has enough trucks to meet its operational requirements while keeping the cost of ownership to a minimum. One way to work toward that goal is to buy or lease forklifts that can perform different types of work rather than maintain separate vehicles for different applications. An increasingly common example is what you might call "free-range" forklifts: equipment that can be used both inside and outside a building.
In addition to cost, there are other reasons to choose lift trucks that can operate indoors and out. They boost productivity for certain types of businesses—like those that must load or unload trailers from the ground rather than from a dock, for retailers like convenience stores that bring pallet jacks in and out of stores, for manufacturers that store large items outdoors and bring them inside to feed into production lines, and for freight handling facilities where lift trucks are regularly exposed to the elements. Harmonizing engine and model types helps make service and maintenance easier and more efficient. And sometimes, a smaller operation simply doesn't have space to park a lot of forklifts.
In the right circumstances, a double-duty approach can be an effective strategy. But not every lift truck is appropriate for both indoor and outdoor use. If you're thinking about using an existing sit-down counterbalanced lift truck in both environments or are looking for a new one that could go either way, here are some considerations to keep in mind.
Tires. Tires play an outsized role in determining where a lift truck can safely travel. That's because outdoor surfaces that are full of rocks, bumps, ruts, or debris can damage tires and make a truck and its load unstable. Even a paved parking lot that's pocked with potholes could cause trouble, observes Mark Faiman, internal combustion product manager for Toyota Material Handling U.S.A., the U.S. distributor for Toyota forklifts.
The two most common types of forklift tires are pneumatic and cushion. Pneumatics, with deep treads for gripping uneven terrain, are typically used outdoors. They're large enough to raise the forklift chassis so it clears rough ground, but their size also results in a fairly wide turning radius. They are available either in solid rubber or filled with compressed air, like automobile tires. Both are rugged and reliable, but solid pneumatics won't go flat, so they're especially useful where there are sharp objects and other debris on the ground. It's also possible to insert foam into air-filled pneumatics to reduce the impact of punctures or other damage to the tire.
Cushion tires are made of smooth, solid rubber that is fitted around a metal band. Their small profile facilitates a tight turning radius. But they do not have the same degree of traction as pneumatics, so they're mostly used on smooth indoor surfaces and on loading docks. They can also handle a well-maintained flat outdoor surface. Still, caution is in order: Cushion-tire trucks may sink into asphalt that's been softened by high heat and sun exposure, warns Bob McGowan, director of industry sales for forklift manufacturer Hyster Co.
Power and fuel. Historically, cushion-tire electric forklifts, which don't emit harmful fumes and pollutants, have been used indoors; cushion-tire internal combustion (IC) trucks powered by propane, a type of liquefied petroleum (LP) gas, were considered indoor/outdoor models; and IC pneumatic-tire trucks powered by diesel or propane were used outdoors, say the experts at Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America (MCFA), which manufactures and distributes Mitsubishi, Cat, and Jungheinrich forklifts. But those traditional distinctions are no longer set in stone, and buyers have more options than ever before, they say.
A major reason for that shift is that today's IC forklift engines "are really clean," says Scott Johnson, vice president of sales and marketing at lift truck manufacturer Clark Material Handling Co. "You still have to ensure proper ventilation and air flow," he says, but lower emissions allow some trucks that had been relegated to outdoor use to now operate indoors too. He credits improved engineering and better-quality fuel for the lower emissions. In particular, he cites efforts by the Propane Education and Research Council (PERC) to ensure that propane distributors filter the fuel properly and that tanks are clean and free of contaminants. "The quality of the fuel today is by far the best we've ever seen," Johnson says.
. Because they are much cleaner-burning than in the past, even these outdoor heavy lifters may be used in some well-ventilated indoor environments now, says Craig Seager, director, industry sales, for lift truck manufacturer Yale Materials Handling Corp.
Another significant change is that heavy-duty battery-powered electrics have caught up to IC trucks in terms of productivity, power, and lifting capacity. Many are equipped with outdoor-friendly pneumatic tires too. This transformation is driven by the growing number of customers looking for cleaner, higher-capacity trucks that can handle heavy lifting and perform just like an IC truck, Seager says. The manufacturers are paying attention: All of the companies we spoke to for this article offer sit-down electric forklifts with big batteries, powerful motors, and pneumatic tires, including some models that can carry loads of up to 11,000 or 12,000 pounds.
Protection against debris and weather. All lift trucks that regularly spend time outdoors—from sit-down models to pallet jacks—are at risk of damage from wet weather, dirt, dust, and other contaminants. Adequate ingress protection (IP) against fluid and contaminants entering the lift truck's components is therefore a must, says Rob Smith, senior manager, U.S. sales, for forklift maker UniCarriers Americas. Ingress-protection (IP) ratings will indicate how well electrical components and mechanical casings are protected against the entry of moisture and solids. (Search "IP ratings" online for more information.)
Dealers can recommend protective devices for lift trucks that operate outdoors or in messy conditions, Smith notes. These include such things as an underbelly screen to keep the cooling system from sucking in debris, protective covers for hydraulic lifting or tilt cylinders, elevated air intakes, and a precleaner to keep dirt and other contaminants out of the engine, he says.
Other examples mentioned by the experts we consulted include specially sealed wiring, "washdown" packages that offer protection against moisture ingress for trucks that must be hosed down, and using extra air filters in the filter housing.
Length, width, and height.
There are size differences between sit-down trucks designed for indoor use and their outdoor counterparts. For example, pneumatic-tire trucks usually have longer, wider chassis; have a higher ground clearance; and, because the tires are larger, have a larger area of contact with the ground than cushion-tire trucks do, Toyota's Faiman says. An electric truck designed for outdoor use usually will be larger than a comparable IC truck because it requires a larger-than-usual battery box to provide the extra power typically needed for outdoor applications.
An outdoor lift truck's larger width, length, and turning radius affect how it performs in a warehouse or DC's aisles. An outdoor truck needs 10- to 14-foot-wide aisles to turn while carrying a load or to pass another truck, according to MCFA's experts. Further, introducing outdoor IC trucks into an aisle configuration designed for electrics with a short wheelbase can compromise productivity, says Clark's Johnson. If operators have to do multipoint turns to pick or put away pallets in racks, they will have a problem, he says. "They probably have throughput commitments per shift, and if they can't do [the operation] in one turn, it will slow them down and make it hard to meet those commitments."
Operators should be especially conscious of the dimensional differences between indoor and outdoor trucks while loading and unloading trailers, Hyster's McGowan says. To illustrate his point, he offers three examples of cases where operators could run into trouble.
A pneumatic forklift with a 48-inch overall width that's unloading pallets that are 48 inches wide from a standard eight-foot-wide trailer can grab two pallets that are positioned side by side. However, if another receiver's pallets are positioned front to back along one side of the trailer, the forklift won't be able to pass the other receiver's shipment to grab pallets farther back.
The taller tires and higher ground clearance of an outdoor forklift make it a few inches taller than indoor equipment. This becomes a problem when working inside a trailer. Even though both lift trucks may have masts with 89-inch down heights and 189-inch up heights, McGowan says, the greater overall height of the outdoor truck restricts the working mast height inside the trailer, to the point where it may not be usable.
Dock-height variations must be accounted for when an outdoor truck enters a trailer. According to McGowan, the typical dock height is about four feet, and the typical dock plate adds a three-inch hump. Adding a dock board to a loading dock that's 3 feet 10 inches raises the entry point by four to six inches and creates a steeper angle of entry. In both cases, a pneumatic-tire truck could be too tall to enter the trailer.
"These scenarios are why we strongly recommend demo-ing any truck you are considering buying or leasing," McGowan says. "Test it in every potential application where you would ever see yourself using it so you can foresee these kinds of problems and constraints."
Operator comfort and safety. In addition to considering the functioning of the equipment itself, it's important to think about how using the same forklift indoors and outdoors could affect the operator's comfort and safety, Yale's Seager says. For example, different lights, such as headlights, spotlights, and turn signals to better illuminate the yard or light up an alley, might be in order. A full-suspension seat will offer better ergonomics on uneven surfaces and ramps. And any truck that will operate outdoors in cold or wet weather should have an enclosed cab and a heater.
Indoor trucks that venture outside may need additional attachments and accessories that weren't necessary on smooth indoor surfaces, Faiman says. For example, clamps or a strapping system may be needed to hold loads in place outdoors while they're driving over uneven ground.
SO, WHICH WAY TO GO?
Demand for lift trucks that can be used both inside and "outside the box," as it were, has grown to the point where at least one manufacturer felt it was time to design a forklift specifically for that market. UniCarriers says it believes its
is the first forklift expressly designed to straddle both worlds, falling "between a traditional cushion-tire Class 4 and a pneumatic-tire Class 5 forklift," according to Smith. The trucks are classified as a Class 5 pneumatic, he says, but they have a smaller footprint, tighter turning radius, and a lower chassis than a pneumatic, while offering a slightly bigger profile and higher ground clearance than comparable cushion-tire trucks.
But is a dual-use truck the right way to go? For many operations, the answer will be an unequivocal yes. If there's intermittent or minimal demand, one truck can be a good choice, McGowan says. But if demand for a truck that works both on the dock and in the yard is so great that "you're having to hold somebody in one position so you can handle the other," then separate inside and outside trucks are necessary to maintain productivity.
Ergonomic considerations may also factor into the "one truck or two?" decision, Johnson notes. If the operator has to constantly jump on and off a forklift during a shift, then equipment designed for outdoor use may lead to ergonomic problems. In such cases, "the dealer might recommend a different product for inside the DC—maybe a stand-up counterbalanced rather than a sit-down IC, for example."
Once the decision to consolidate has been made, other questions arise. Should it be an indoor truck or an outdoor type? The various considerations discussed in this article should be carefully considered. But McGowan's counsel is generally to "lead with a Class 5 forklift for outside, then make sure it also meets indoor criteria."
Should it be an electric or IC model? Cost is relevant, of course. Electric trucks typically come at a higher upfront cost than IC models, but MCFA's experts note that in terms of energy consumption, electricity costs less than gas or diesel. Regardless, they add, the long-term total cost of ownership for the equipment should influence the decision.
One thing everyone consulted for this article agrees on: A double-duty approach should only be implemented where safety, productivity, and the condition of the equipment and facility will not be compromised. The best way to be sure, they urge, is to have an authorized dealer survey every application before you decide which path to travel.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."