With a smooth peak season in the rearview mirror, retail supply chain executives turn their focus to new strategies for tackling the labor crunch and incorporating disruptive technology.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
From a supply chain perspective, the 2018 holiday season was relatively quiet. While some retailers struggled with sales (most notably the department store chain Macy's), most made it through the holidays without any major breakdowns in service. Inventory was in stock, on-shelf availability was good, and e-commerce orders were delivered on time.
As retailers now turn the corner into 2019, they are looking to build on that success. But to do so, they will have to navigate a host of challenges, including the pressures created by omnichannel retailing, a shortage of labor, and an ongoing push to boost operating efficiency.
To find out how retailers are responding to these and other challenges, a team from Auburn University's Center for Supply Chain Innovation conducts a study among retail supply chain executives each year. The research is conducted in two parts. For the first phase of the study, a team led by the center's executive director, Brian Gibson, conducts in-depth interviews with about two-dozen senior supply chain executives from some of the top 100 retailers by sales (the vast majority work at companies with $2 billion or more in sales). This year, those interviews took place in December and January. The second phase is an online survey that Auburn conducts in conjunction with DC Velocity and the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA). The results of that survey, which is now under way, will form the basis for the annual State of the Retail Supply Chain Report, which will be published by the end of April, according to Gibson. (Last year's report can be found here.)
Although the results of the online survey were not available at press time, the executive interviews offer some important clues into where the retail industry is headed this year. What follows is a look at some of the findings.
RUNNING HOT
Many of the pressures and goals cited by retail executives during this year's interviews are not new. For instance, last year at this time, many of the executives Gibson spoke with identified better management of omnichannel commerce as a top priority. This year's interviews suggest that most have made good progress toward reaching that goal. "They are more comfortable that they have enough inventory allocated effectively and that they are doing a better job filling orders efficiently," Gibson says.
But that doesn't mean that retailers have omnichannel fulfillment completely figured out. Fulfillment of e-commerce orders remains expensive, and retailers are still trying to find the most cost-effective way to get product to customers, as they explore options like "buy online, pick up in store," or BOPIS. "They are still all striving for the perfect combination of where best to fill orders from and how to avoid a lot of split shipments," Gibson says. "There are still opportunities to enhance in-stock availability from the point closest to the last mile."
MAKE A GROWN MAN(AGER) CRY
These efforts to find that perfect combination, however, are happening in a tight labor market. While a 3.9-percent unemployment rate is great news for the general economy, it's enough to make distribution center (DC) managers cry.
That's because the better the employment picture gets, the harder it is for them to retain workers. In periods of low unemployment, people tend to leave distribution center jobs, which are often physically demanding and have less-than-desirable hours, for work in other industries.
"Retailers have had to get creative over the past year in order to overcome labor availability shortages," Gibson says.
According to Gibson, some of the strategies that companies have deployed in a bid to retain workers include:
Accelerating pay-scale escalation. For example, in the past, a company's policy might have been to start new employees at $12.50 per hour and then bump them up to $15.50 per hour after three years. Now, new employees may be earning $15.50 an hour after just 18 months.
Expanding the kinds of benefits offered to full-time employees.
Providing full benefits for part-time associates who work at least 30 hours a week.
Using software apps to give DC workers more control over their work schedule. These apps allow workers to see what hours they've been assigned, trade shifts, and volunteer for extra shifts or overtime.
Investing in automated equipment or assistive technology, such as mobile carts and robotic arms, to make DC work less physically demanding.
People issues are not just limited to the hourly work force, Gibson says. Supply chain executives are also struggling to retain and develop future leaders in an environment where young professionals often change jobs after only two years. Adding to the challenge, they're discovering that candidates with the skills they're looking for aren't easy to find. "They need people who understand supply chain management, are comfortable in the analytics space, and can lead the charge toward automation, omnichannel excellence, and supply chain digitization," Gibson says.
DOUBLE SPEED
While labor may be tight, the pressure to quickly make and execute on supply chain decisions has only intensified. In response, retailers are increasingly turning to "disruptive" technologies that will allow them to respond faster, Gibson says.
Three areas that are attracting particular attention are robotics, supply chain digitization, and artificial intelligence (AI) and predictive analytics. What follows is a look at some trends in these areas:
Robotics: Retailers are showing unprecedented interest in robotic technologies, but when it comes to the types of technologies they're investigating, the choices are all over the map. On one end are large grocery retailers, such as Kroger, that are looking at automating their entire facility with equipment like automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS). On the other end are smaller companies that are focusing on automated pallet jacks or carts that travel alongside the worker as he or she picks orders. Companies are also interested in robotic arms that can grab and lift heavy cartons or individual items.
Digitization: At the same time they're exploring robotics, retailers are also pursuing initiatives aimed at "digitizing" the supply chain, according to Gibson. For many of them, this means establishing data pools or repositories that contain detailed information on products, inventory levels, costs, transactions, and the like. This data pool will provide "a single version of the truth" not just for the supply chain function but for other functions as well. The hope is that this digitization will improve supply chain visibility and transparency, which will in turn lead to better inventory allocation and customer service.
Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics: As retailers work to create a common pool of supply chain data, they're also hoping that advances in AI and predictive analytics can help them use that information more effectively. What these companies ultimately want, according to Gibson, is the ability to leverage analytics programs and AI to provide managers with "actionable information," thereby reducing the amount of time supply chain managers spend "crunching data and staring at spreadsheets."
For example, companies could use AI to assess the accuracy of the forecasting models they've used in the past and make suggestions about which models they should use for specific situations—say, peak versus nonpeak seasons. Similarly, predictive analytics could be used to create much more focused, specific inventory allocation suggestions that could be customized to an individual store.
Not all disruptive technologies are garnering the same amount of interest from retailers, however. According to Gibson, the sense among most of the supply chain executives he's interviewed is that technologies like blockchain and the Internet of Things (IoT) are still way out on the horizon. "For the most part, they are finding that blockchain is still at the theoretical discussion stage," he says.
With the exception of blockchain and IoT, however, retailers' interest in disruptive technology is more than just talk, according to Gibson. He says retail supply chain leaders are finding it easier to obtain approval for investments in automated equipment and technology than they did in the past. While companies once evaluated spending requests strictly on the basis of cost, payback period, and return on investment (ROI), they appear to be backing off from those rigid guidelines. Today, they're more willing to look past those metrics in cases where the proposed technologies have high potential to improve service quality, boost inventory accuracy, or help the company better meet deadlines and delivery dates, Gibson says.
This willingness to invest in their supply chains is decidedly good news. Without that new technology (and a commitment to retaining and developing their talent), retailers will be hard-pressed to keep up with the rapidly evolving omnichannel commerce world and compete with the likes of Amazon. And in spite of this past holiday season's success, those that fail to keep up could next year find themselves in the same plight as Toys "R" Us, Sears, and other retailers that didn't adapt to the times.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."