Despite everyone's best efforts, late parcel deliveries seem to be a fact of life during the holiday shipping season. But there are some steps shippers can take to boost the odds that their packages will arrive as planned.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
For parcel shippers and carriers alike, the holiday season is a grueling stress test. Many retailers ship the majority of their orders in the last two months of the year, ramping up daily volumes and straining carriers' capacity. Order volumes spike and backlogs develop, causing Aunt Nelly's sweater or Timmy's cHemiätry kit to arrive sometime after Christmas.
By all accounts, the number of late holiday deliveries directly relates to the extraordinary growth of e-commerce orders, most of which move via the parcel carriers FedEx and UPS and the U.S. Postal Service (USPS). Since late 2013, when a sharp spike in e-commerce shipments caught them off-guard, parcel carriers have taken steps to better prepare themselves for holiday traffic. Depending on the carrier, these have included requiring shippers to provide more detailed forecasts; hiring tens of thousands of temporary workers; expanding weekend and evening service; adding more trucks, planes, and warehouse capacity; modifying shipment routing; limiting the number of parcels they accept immediately before Christmas; and levying peak-season surcharges to help cover those additional costs.
Still, e-commerce parcel volumes continue to exceed forecasts, and evidence suggests that carriers are still struggling to keep up. Sixty-one percent of consumers polled for shipping technology specialist Pitney Bowes' 2018 Global eCommerce Study said they were frustrated last year by some element of holiday shopping, such as late deliveries, inaccurate tracking, and high shipping costs. Significantly, that's up from 47 percent in the previous year, says Lila Snyder, Pitney Bowes' executive vice president and president, commerce services. And 80 percent of respondents surveyed for parcel spend management specialist Green Mountain Technology's 2018 Annual Benchmarking Report on parcel transportation said on-time performance was their key concern during the 2017-2018 peak shipping season.
Shippers don't have the entire view of what FedEx, UPS, or the USPS are doing. But with the right technology, they can identify where there might be problems, take steps to avoid them, and alert the end customer.
Late deliveries are partly due to the conflict of carriers', consumers', and shippers' interests, according to Joe Wilkinson, senior director of consulting for enVista, a global consulting and software solutions firm. The main factor is consumer behavior—late orders that flood the system at the 11th hour. Shippers that encourage or enable last-minute orders and those that provide carriers with inaccurate forecasts bear some responsibility too. Carriers, meanwhile, can't build networks to accommodate holiday peaks, which can be three or four times their normal volumes, and operate them all year round, he says.
Other factors that contribute to late deliveries include insufficient labor—hard to avoid with today's low unemployment rate—and winter storms that can delay not just last-mile deliveries, but also the cross-country truckload or intermodal linehaul portion of a parcel's journey, Snyder notes.
It's unlikely, therefore, that late deliveries can be completely eliminated. But there are some steps shippers can take to reduce the risk of holiday-season snafus. They include the following:
Hone your forecasts. It's hard for shippers to predict what the customer will buy, says Katie Parker, director of strategic solutions at Green Mountain Technology, yet it's more important to get forecasts right in peak season than at any other time of year. "When parcel shippers underestimate the volume and timing of their shipments, it affects carriers' ability to plan and manage their peak-season operations," she points out.
To avoid "underpredicting," some shippers give carriers forecast ranges. It's best, though, to continue to adjust forecasts and ensure they're as accurate as they can make them, right up until a few days before Christmas, Wilkinson advises.
Manage customers' expectations. Increasingly, consumers expect to be able to place orders a few days before Christmas and still get guaranteed delivery before the holiday. But the more packages that enter the system as the clock winds down, the harder it is for carriers to meet those expectations. That's why the major carriers stipulate that certain rules and service guarantees do not apply during peak season.
One way shippers can reduce volume in those final days is to work with their carriers to set earlier cutoff dates. Merchants may be reluctant to do that, though. If 40 percent or more of a company's annual sales are holiday-related, Snyder says, "every day matters, so retailers will want to push as close to that edge as they can."
Another option is to offer incentives like discounts to encourage customers to order earlier in the season. Spreading orders over a longer period helps both shippers and carriers allocate their resources so as to avoid bottlenecks in their operations, Parker says. And if a package is delayed, the shipper and carrier will have more time to fix the problem before the holiday deadline.
Ship differently. For some shippers, it may be worthwhile to up their holiday delivery game, even if it costs more. One that has adopted this approach is the book publisher Penguin Random House (PRH), which mostly sells to distributors, independent booksellers, and specialty retailers. PRH ships about 400 million books a year, via a combination of truckload, less-than-truckload (LTL), and parcel service, according to Annette Danek-Akey, senior vice president of fulfillment. UPS is the publisher's main parcel carrier.
As the holiday season approaches, PRH implements its "2-Day Rapid Replenishment" program for independent bookstores. Beginning Oct. 1, bookstores that place their orders by 3 p.m. will receive them within two business days. The two-day transit program, now in its eighth year, is standard throughout the season. "We recognize the importance of bookstores' receiving product to support their holiday-season sales, so we're willing to increase our transportation cost to make sure they get their orders in two days," Danek-Akey says. That short-term increase produces long-term benefits for PRH: The program has been instrumental in generating "great sales" from independent bookstores, she notes.
Filling a truckload and dropping those packages into national and/or regional parcel carriers' networks across the country can help to lighten the load on local infrastructure, Wilkinson says. Good communication helps to speed the parcels to their destination. Penguin Random House, for example, uploads package-level detail to UPS as it finishes loading a trailer. This expedites processing at the sortation center because the parcel carrier can decide how to handle the packages before the truck arrives.
Another way to reduce the burden on carriers' networks is to deliver some consumer orders via LTL service to stores and then use ship-from-store and pick-up-in-store strategies. This adds to a seasonal increase in store labor costs, but it also reduces miles, "touches," per-piece transportation costs, and in some cases, days in transit. Positioning inventory closer to customers—for example, in regional distribution centers—provides more flexibility while reducing transit times.
Diversify your carriers. Spreading parcel volume across multiple carriers can help to assure capacity at busy times. Green Mountain Technology's benchmark report found that more shippers are doing just that by shifting to regional carriers, which have a smaller geographic footprint but usually offer faster transit times and experience fewer bottlenecks, Parker says.
Wilkinson agrees that diversifying carriers can be a smart way to increase flexibility but cautions against approaching regional carriers only when the going gets tough. Capacity is very tight for them, too, during the peak season, and they will have to give priority to their existing customers. Having a year-round business relationship allows for advance planning and makes it more likely that your holiday shipments can be accommodated.
Communicate early and often. If there's anything e-commerce has proven, it's that consumer preferences and demand can change quickly. That's why regular proactive communication throughout peak season is important. Pitney Bowes, which helps many merchants with labeling and tracking of parcels, routinely sees consumers tracking their packages nine or 10 times during a delivery period. This shows "how hungry they are for more information than they typically get," Snyder says.
When it comes to working with carriers, Danek-Akey says, "It doesn't hurt to overcommunicate a little in the fall." She recommends asking parcel carriers how, and how often, they want to be notified for various types of information, including exceptions. For PRH's two-day transit program, her staff shares weekly projections electronically with the carrier and updates them daily. If something unexpected comes up, the DC will alert UPS via e-mail. When there's a potential problem or an issue requiring special handling, however, a phone call to alert the carrier and discuss a solution can be helpful, she says.
Take advantage of technology. Many small-volume shippers rely on their carriers' free software to manage their shipments. But some say they'd do better to use commercial parcel management software with a broader array of capabilities. "Most shippers know where their packages are going, but they don't have the entire view of what UPS, FedEx, or the USPS are doing," Parker observes. With the right technology, however, they can identify where and why there might be problems and bottlenecks, and take steps to avoid them. Such early warning also gives shippers time to alert the end-customer, she adds.
Some shippers use a transportation management system (TMS) to manage their parcel shipments. About 46 percent of respondents to a 2018 survey conducted for the TMS provider MercuryGate said they are using a TMS or comparable technology for that purpose. According to MercuryGate, a TMS with parcel capabilities lets shippers compare rates and services without having to switch software or websites, select the right carrier based on cost and service, and keep current on carriers' rules, service changes, and pricing. It also facilitates decisions on when and where to consolidate shipments or switch modes to reduce transit times.
KEEP THE CUSTOMER SATISFIED
Because late parcel deliveries strongly impact customer satisfaction, it's worth taking steps to prevent them. "It may cost you more to expedite," Snyder comments, "but if you're trading off delighting the customer [against] ruining their holiday, then you have to balance the cost of an expedited delivery against the post-purchase experience that will determine a consumer's loyalty."
But what if, despite everyone's best efforts, a shipment is late? Wilkinson advises being proactive: Make sure the customer knows how to reach you. If there's a problem, respond quickly. If you see that an order may be late, let the customer know in advance. And "have plans in place for how to make the customer whole ... whether it's refunding the package cost or making a change in service level and/or cost while [in transit], if that's feasible."
Don't wait too long to think about all this. "It's important to understand that Dec. 26, 2018, is the time to start planning for the 2019 peak season, not October of 2019," Wilkinson advises. "You can't build a peak-season plan in a month; you have to build it over the course of many months."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."