Despite everyone's best efforts, late parcel deliveries seem to be a fact of life during the holiday shipping season. But there are some steps shippers can take to boost the odds that their packages will arrive as planned.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
For parcel shippers and carriers alike, the holiday season is a grueling stress test. Many retailers ship the majority of their orders in the last two months of the year, ramping up daily volumes and straining carriers' capacity. Order volumes spike and backlogs develop, causing Aunt Nelly's sweater or Timmy's cHemiätry kit to arrive sometime after Christmas.
By all accounts, the number of late holiday deliveries directly relates to the extraordinary growth of e-commerce orders, most of which move via the parcel carriers FedEx and UPS and the U.S. Postal Service (USPS). Since late 2013, when a sharp spike in e-commerce shipments caught them off-guard, parcel carriers have taken steps to better prepare themselves for holiday traffic. Depending on the carrier, these have included requiring shippers to provide more detailed forecasts; hiring tens of thousands of temporary workers; expanding weekend and evening service; adding more trucks, planes, and warehouse capacity; modifying shipment routing; limiting the number of parcels they accept immediately before Christmas; and levying peak-season surcharges to help cover those additional costs.
Still, e-commerce parcel volumes continue to exceed forecasts, and evidence suggests that carriers are still struggling to keep up. Sixty-one percent of consumers polled for shipping technology specialist Pitney Bowes' 2018 Global eCommerce Study said they were frustrated last year by some element of holiday shopping, such as late deliveries, inaccurate tracking, and high shipping costs. Significantly, that's up from 47 percent in the previous year, says Lila Snyder, Pitney Bowes' executive vice president and president, commerce services. And 80 percent of respondents surveyed for parcel spend management specialist Green Mountain Technology's 2018 Annual Benchmarking Report on parcel transportation said on-time performance was their key concern during the 2017-2018 peak shipping season.
Shippers don't have the entire view of what FedEx, UPS, or the USPS are doing. But with the right technology, they can identify where there might be problems, take steps to avoid them, and alert the end customer.
Late deliveries are partly due to the conflict of carriers', consumers', and shippers' interests, according to Joe Wilkinson, senior director of consulting for enVista, a global consulting and software solutions firm. The main factor is consumer behavior—late orders that flood the system at the 11th hour. Shippers that encourage or enable last-minute orders and those that provide carriers with inaccurate forecasts bear some responsibility too. Carriers, meanwhile, can't build networks to accommodate holiday peaks, which can be three or four times their normal volumes, and operate them all year round, he says.
Other factors that contribute to late deliveries include insufficient labor—hard to avoid with today's low unemployment rate—and winter storms that can delay not just last-mile deliveries, but also the cross-country truckload or intermodal linehaul portion of a parcel's journey, Snyder notes.
It's unlikely, therefore, that late deliveries can be completely eliminated. But there are some steps shippers can take to reduce the risk of holiday-season snafus. They include the following:
Hone your forecasts. It's hard for shippers to predict what the customer will buy, says Katie Parker, director of strategic solutions at Green Mountain Technology, yet it's more important to get forecasts right in peak season than at any other time of year. "When parcel shippers underestimate the volume and timing of their shipments, it affects carriers' ability to plan and manage their peak-season operations," she points out.
To avoid "underpredicting," some shippers give carriers forecast ranges. It's best, though, to continue to adjust forecasts and ensure they're as accurate as they can make them, right up until a few days before Christmas, Wilkinson advises.
Manage customers' expectations. Increasingly, consumers expect to be able to place orders a few days before Christmas and still get guaranteed delivery before the holiday. But the more packages that enter the system as the clock winds down, the harder it is for carriers to meet those expectations. That's why the major carriers stipulate that certain rules and service guarantees do not apply during peak season.
One way shippers can reduce volume in those final days is to work with their carriers to set earlier cutoff dates. Merchants may be reluctant to do that, though. If 40 percent or more of a company's annual sales are holiday-related, Snyder says, "every day matters, so retailers will want to push as close to that edge as they can."
Another option is to offer incentives like discounts to encourage customers to order earlier in the season. Spreading orders over a longer period helps both shippers and carriers allocate their resources so as to avoid bottlenecks in their operations, Parker says. And if a package is delayed, the shipper and carrier will have more time to fix the problem before the holiday deadline.
Ship differently. For some shippers, it may be worthwhile to up their holiday delivery game, even if it costs more. One that has adopted this approach is the book publisher Penguin Random House (PRH), which mostly sells to distributors, independent booksellers, and specialty retailers. PRH ships about 400 million books a year, via a combination of truckload, less-than-truckload (LTL), and parcel service, according to Annette Danek-Akey, senior vice president of fulfillment. UPS is the publisher's main parcel carrier.
As the holiday season approaches, PRH implements its "2-Day Rapid Replenishment" program for independent bookstores. Beginning Oct. 1, bookstores that place their orders by 3 p.m. will receive them within two business days. The two-day transit program, now in its eighth year, is standard throughout the season. "We recognize the importance of bookstores' receiving product to support their holiday-season sales, so we're willing to increase our transportation cost to make sure they get their orders in two days," Danek-Akey says. That short-term increase produces long-term benefits for PRH: The program has been instrumental in generating "great sales" from independent bookstores, she notes.
Filling a truckload and dropping those packages into national and/or regional parcel carriers' networks across the country can help to lighten the load on local infrastructure, Wilkinson says. Good communication helps to speed the parcels to their destination. Penguin Random House, for example, uploads package-level detail to UPS as it finishes loading a trailer. This expedites processing at the sortation center because the parcel carrier can decide how to handle the packages before the truck arrives.
Another way to reduce the burden on carriers' networks is to deliver some consumer orders via LTL service to stores and then use ship-from-store and pick-up-in-store strategies. This adds to a seasonal increase in store labor costs, but it also reduces miles, "touches," per-piece transportation costs, and in some cases, days in transit. Positioning inventory closer to customers—for example, in regional distribution centers—provides more flexibility while reducing transit times.
Diversify your carriers. Spreading parcel volume across multiple carriers can help to assure capacity at busy times. Green Mountain Technology's benchmark report found that more shippers are doing just that by shifting to regional carriers, which have a smaller geographic footprint but usually offer faster transit times and experience fewer bottlenecks, Parker says.
Wilkinson agrees that diversifying carriers can be a smart way to increase flexibility but cautions against approaching regional carriers only when the going gets tough. Capacity is very tight for them, too, during the peak season, and they will have to give priority to their existing customers. Having a year-round business relationship allows for advance planning and makes it more likely that your holiday shipments can be accommodated.
Communicate early and often. If there's anything e-commerce has proven, it's that consumer preferences and demand can change quickly. That's why regular proactive communication throughout peak season is important. Pitney Bowes, which helps many merchants with labeling and tracking of parcels, routinely sees consumers tracking their packages nine or 10 times during a delivery period. This shows "how hungry they are for more information than they typically get," Snyder says.
When it comes to working with carriers, Danek-Akey says, "It doesn't hurt to overcommunicate a little in the fall." She recommends asking parcel carriers how, and how often, they want to be notified for various types of information, including exceptions. For PRH's two-day transit program, her staff shares weekly projections electronically with the carrier and updates them daily. If something unexpected comes up, the DC will alert UPS via e-mail. When there's a potential problem or an issue requiring special handling, however, a phone call to alert the carrier and discuss a solution can be helpful, she says.
Take advantage of technology. Many small-volume shippers rely on their carriers' free software to manage their shipments. But some say they'd do better to use commercial parcel management software with a broader array of capabilities. "Most shippers know where their packages are going, but they don't have the entire view of what UPS, FedEx, or the USPS are doing," Parker observes. With the right technology, however, they can identify where and why there might be problems and bottlenecks, and take steps to avoid them. Such early warning also gives shippers time to alert the end-customer, she adds.
Some shippers use a transportation management system (TMS) to manage their parcel shipments. About 46 percent of respondents to a 2018 survey conducted for the TMS provider MercuryGate said they are using a TMS or comparable technology for that purpose. According to MercuryGate, a TMS with parcel capabilities lets shippers compare rates and services without having to switch software or websites, select the right carrier based on cost and service, and keep current on carriers' rules, service changes, and pricing. It also facilitates decisions on when and where to consolidate shipments or switch modes to reduce transit times.
KEEP THE CUSTOMER SATISFIED
Because late parcel deliveries strongly impact customer satisfaction, it's worth taking steps to prevent them. "It may cost you more to expedite," Snyder comments, "but if you're trading off delighting the customer [against] ruining their holiday, then you have to balance the cost of an expedited delivery against the post-purchase experience that will determine a consumer's loyalty."
But what if, despite everyone's best efforts, a shipment is late? Wilkinson advises being proactive: Make sure the customer knows how to reach you. If there's a problem, respond quickly. If you see that an order may be late, let the customer know in advance. And "have plans in place for how to make the customer whole ... whether it's refunding the package cost or making a change in service level and/or cost while [in transit], if that's feasible."
Don't wait too long to think about all this. "It's important to understand that Dec. 26, 2018, is the time to start planning for the 2019 peak season, not October of 2019," Wilkinson advises. "You can't build a peak-season plan in a month; you have to build it over the course of many months."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."