Coming together for road safety: interview with Joshua Girard
A private-sector group called "Together for Safer Roads" wants to keep global roads accident-free. Joshua Girard of AB InBev explains how the corporate world is pitching in to do this.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
The future holds few safe bets. But here's one: Globally, more motor vehicles will be in use 10 years from now than are today. More online orders mean more truck deliveries. More disposable income in developing nations means more commerce and more cars. Unfortunately, this may mean more carnage on the world's roads.
The mission of a group called "Together for Safer Roads" (TSR) is to ensure that unfortunate scenario never occurs. Founded four years ago, TSR is a coalition of well-known companies that have pooled their resources to improve global road safety. As a founding board member of TSR, Belgian brewing giant AB InBev is at the forefront of the effort and has contributed the learnings it has gleaned from operating its own private truck fleet.
Joshua Girard, global director, safety at AB InBev, spoke recently with Mark B. Solomon, DC Velocity's executive editor-news, about TSR's approach, his company's role in the organization, and the scourge of safety advocates everywhere: drivers distracted by mobile devices.
Q: Can you describe TSR's mission and what the companies in the group are doing to fulfill it?
A: Each year, 1.25 million people are killed and 50 million are injured on the world's roads. Road safety should be a shared responsibility between the public and private sector. TSR is a coalition of global private-sector companies whose mission is to improve road safety. We bring together members' knowledge, data, technology, and global networks to focus on areas that will make the greatest impact globally and within local communities. Our members leverage their private-sector insights to advance best practices for companies and their fleets, and we are aligned with the United Nations' Decade of Action for Road Safety.
Q: To what extent does your work focus on improving the safety performance of rigs and drivers, rather than passenger cars and the motorists who operate them?
A: To help ensure a safe fleet culture within our company, we work with our drivers to analyze roadways with the aim of avoiding dangerous areas, both before and during our drivers' journey. Each day, we build routes that are mapped into a telemetry system to help provide the safest route possible, ensuring our drivers remain safe at all times.
We're aware that our drivers might not always have the same route each day, which is why we run their routes through the pre-journey planning process. We find it's also really helpful to have a system that will sound an alert when approaching a designated hazardous area of the route—one that the driver may not be familiar with if it's a new route.
Q: What is AB InBev's role in TSR, and how has it engaged its private fleet network to help accomplish the group's objective?
A: AB InBev is a founding Governing Board member. We helped establish the coalition in 2014 out of a need for the private sector to step up and improve road safety by sharing knowledge, data, technology, and global networks. For example, in collaboration with TSR, AB InBev has helped develop a "Best Practices" series of reports, which aggregate TSR member companies' processes and guidelines for developing and managing corporate transportation programs. The series has shown that by using the latest technologies, the private sector can ensure its operations, fleets, and employee drivers are safe during transport.
Q: You have cast a global net in your efforts to improve road safety. How does the U.S. compare with other countries, both developed and developing, in road safety performance?
A: North America can be a challenging market. However, there are a lot of things working in our favor. Access to technology, transportation infrastructure, government regulations, and coalitions like TSR help to reduce risk and improve safe driving behavior. As a result, AB InBev has reported zero road fatalities in developed markets. In developing zones, we have been able to reduce fatalities by 41 percent compared with last year.
Q: In America, there has been much discussion over the extent to which truck-related crashes are caused not by the truck drivers but by the behavior of motorists. Does your research and analysis corroborate the view that much of the fault lies with motorists putting themselves and big rigs in harm's way?
A: We all have to do our part in reducing road fatalities. AB InBev drivers go through extensive training, and our management teams monitor driver behavior to provide positive guidance and reinforcement. Most motorists do not receive the level of training or continuous coaching a professional driver receives. Yet their vehicles can be just as dangerous.
We focus on providing coaching to our drivers on defensive driving techniques so they can anticipate other drivers' behaviors and safely maneuver their vehicle to prevent crashes. We are also piloting technology like collision-avoidance systems, fatigue monitoring, and cameras equipped to proactively identify road hazards and communicate to our drivers.
Q: Speaking of behavior, what are the truly serious areas that need to be corrected?
A: One driver behavior stands out as an epidemic: the use of mobile phones while driving. AB InBev is running a pilot project in which a device that blocks cellphone use is installed in the cabins of its fleet vehicles. This device will only allow navigation programs to run on the driver's phone, as well as single-touch, hands-free call answering. All other operations and programs are blocked from use, including texting, placing outgoing calls (apart from emergency numbers), and opening other apps.
Q: Virtually all big rigs in the U.S. are required to have electronic logging devices (ELD) installed to track a driver's compliance with federal hours-of-service regulations. Do you see that moving the needle in improving road safety here?
A: ELDs are a great tool. But they are just one way to monitor and manage fleet safety. We utilize telemetry technology in nearly all of our fleets to provide ongoing monitoring of driver behavior, with a focus on speed, rapid acceleration, rapid deceleration, and gravitational-force (G-force).
Speed limits are not always the best indication of an acceptable speed for a fleet vehicle. For example, we wouldn't want a compact car and a fleet vehicle going down a steep hill at the same speed. When one of our vehicles is approaching a hazardous area such as a steep hill at a dangerous speed, the telemetry system will send an alert to the driver, who can adjust the speed accordingly. By focusing on speed and implementing telemetry technology, AB InBev has seen a decrease in truck crash-related fatalities in our "Tier 2" delivery fleet from nine in 2014, to four in 2015, to zero in 2016.
We use methods such as coaching, retraining, and, if necessary, disciplinary action. In one geographic zone, if a driver triggers this alarm five times in a one-week period, management will pull the driver off the road and mandate he or she complete a safety training course before being allowed behind the wheel again.
Q: If there were one universal thing that folks could do to make roads safer, what would that be?
A: We have seen the most success in driver behavior monitoring and coaching. There are many telemetry systems out there. However, just putting a box in the truck is not going to make you successful. The data needs to be analyzed and used to change driver behavior in a positive way.
When evaluating these systems, first look at their capabilities for data collection. Some basics are street-by-street speed monitoring, seatbelt use, and aggressive driving indicators. As the industry grows, we are seeing some amazing technology around cellphone control, fatigue management, collision avoidance, etc. However, regardless of which system you choose, it needs to have a robust data collection and analysis system. The worst thing you can do when implementing telematics is to neglect to put a management system in place to proactively use the data. Data can be so powerful when used correctly to both reinforce positive driving behaviors and discourage potentially unsafe habits. Also, if you are basing your success solely on zero incidents, you may be missing an opportunity. Safety should be about the things that we are doing, not just the absence of incidents.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.