Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
In the decades since they were introduced into warehouse operations, mobile computing devices have virtually transformed the business of data collection, making pencils and clipboards a thing of the past. But it's not just the warehouses that have experienced a transformation; the devices themselves have undergone a wholesale evolutionary change over that period, morphing from the clunky scanners of yesteryear to today's smart, sleek multifunctional devices.
And there's more change ahead. This time, the catalyst isn't so much technological advances as a business decision by the market's dominant player. In February 2017, Microsoft Corp. announced that it planned to "sunset" its support of its popular Windows CE and Embedded Handheld operating systems (OS), the versions of its Windows OS used in nearly all brands of handheld devices. The move is widely expected to trigger a rush among warehouse users to replace what will soon be obsolete devices.
So what does all this mean for the market? Will users make wholesale technology replacements? Or will they take a wait-and-see approach? And if they decide to swap out their equipment, what will they look for in their next-generation devices?
To get a better understanding of mobile computing in the warehouse—both where it stands today and users' plans for the future—DC Velocity teamed up with ARC Advisory Group, a Dedham, Mass., management consulting firm, to conduct a study. The research, which was conducted among 34 logistics professionals, looked at topics such as respondents' current use and future plans for use of various mobile operating systems (OS), the relative importance of mobile OS capabilities, the value of various scanning capabilities, and their use of consumer-grade versus ruggedized equipment. What follows is a look at some of the key findings.
MICROSOFT STILL IN THE PICTURE
To get a read on what operating systems warehouses are using right now, the survey asked respondents which OS they used for the majority (more than 60 percent) of their warehouse mobile devices. As expected, the study confirmed that for now, at least, Microsoft is king. A full 60 percent of respondents said the majority of their units ran on the Windows platform. (See Exhibit 1 for the full rundown.)
That could change in the very near future, however. Although Microsoft released a new mobile operating platform (Windows 10 IoT) earlier this year, indications are that the market is moving in an altogether different direction. Rather than defaulting to the latest Microsoft offering, users are widely expected to defect to a rival operating system: Google Inc.'s Android OS. Among other benefits, Android, the operating system used in an estimated 86 percent of the world's smartphones as well as other consumer electronics, has the advantage of familiarity to users and programmers alike. A number of major hardware vendors, including Honeywell Inc. and Zebra Technologies, have already introduced Android-based handhelds for DC applications.
Indeed, when asked how they expected their OS usage patterns to change over the next three years, 56 percent of respondents indicated they planned to increase their use of Android. While that aligns with the current industry thinking, Microsoft nonetheless had an unexpectedly strong showing in our poll. Nearly a third of respondents—29 percent—said they expected to increase their use of Windows in that period. (See Exhibit 2.)
This finding suggests that Microsoft may play a more enduring role in warehouse mobile computing than expected. The survey results didn't reveal the reasons for that, but Clint Reiser, ARC's director of supply chain research and the study's leader, offered a possible explanation. Reiser speculated that the finding reflects the warehouse community's tendency to move cautiously when it comes to adopting new technologies.
As an example of that, Reiser pointed to another of the study's findings: the revelation that more than a third (35 percent) of warehouses are still using devices with alphanumeric keypads, as opposed to the touchscreen interfaces found on today's consumer smartphones. "These results, like the still-widespread use of Windows OS, suggest that warehouses are adopting modern mobile technologies at a more measured pace than some customer-facing areas of businesses," Reiser said.
That's not to say all warehouses are watching from the sidelines. Of those respondents that plan to migrate from Windows to Android, a sizeable share—40 percent—have already begun the changeover. To learn what they expect to gain from the move, the survey asked those respondents that are migrating to Android what impact they expected the transition to have on their operations. The most frequent responses were improvements in user interface/usability, support for complementary devices, mobile application development, and handheld hardware performance. By comparison, fewer users foresaw improvements in areas such as wireless communications options, application software performance, wireless data security, and preventing misuse of devices.
HANDHELDS AND TABLETS
The question of operating systems aside, the survey looked at other factors that influence users' choice of mobile equipment. For instance, the questionnaire asked respondents what capabilities they consider most important in a handheld device. Far and away the top response was "data capture/scanning accuracy." The next most popular responses were data capture/scanning speed and visual information display. (See Exhibit 3.)
A question that often comes up with respect to handhelds in the warehouse concerns the grade of equipment used. Today's DCs have choices: They can buy purpose-built ruggedized industrial devices or opt for consumer-grade smartphones with built-in scanners—which are generally lower-cost, but lower-scan-performance, units. Our survey indicated that despite the price advantage, consumer devices were not a particularly popular choice. The results showed that only 3 percent of respondents make widespread use of consumer-grade handhelds, while 35 percent do it only selectively and 62 percent don't use them at all.
Digging into the subject a little further, the survey included a similar question about the devices provided to temp workers brought in during peak periods. Although logic might dictate that DCs would opt for lower-cost (and familiar-to-users) consumer-grade devices in this situation, that wasn't the case. Among the DCs that bought or leased mobile devices for temp workers' use, respondents showed a clear preference for ruggedized industrial devices. (See Exhibit 4.)
Of course, when it comes to mobile devices, handhelds aren't the only units found in today's DCs. Some facilities also make use of tablets. Our research indicated that these devices have yet to take hold throughout the DC, however. Respondents reported that the most widespread tablet use was found among workers driving vehicles like forklifts, who used vehicle-mounted devices (35 percent). Next on the list were warehouse supervisors (32 percent), employees at pack stations (21 percent), and order pickers (18 percent).
A MATTER OF TIME
With the mobile computing market at a crossroads, the results of our industry study make one thing quite clear: Logistics managers are fully aware of the potential held by the next generation of handheld computers. Although they may not be ready to give up their legacy devices just yet, it's likely only a matter of time. The allure of user-friendly interfaces, more accurate scanning, and faster processing will eventually win out, ushering in a new era of mobile computing in the workplace.
ABOUT THE STUDY
The "Mobile Computing in the Modern Warehouse" study was conducted by ARC Advisory Group in conjunction with DC Velocity. ARC analyst Clint Reiser oversaw the research and compiled the results.
The 24-question survey explored the current use of mobile devices in the warehouse as well as users' plans for the future. The findings reported here are based on 34 responses. Respondents included logistics professionals from a variety of industries, who completed an online questionnaire in July 2018. As for the demographic breakdown, the respondents included manufacturers (47 percent), wholesalers (21 percent), third-party logistics service providers (15 percent), retailers (6 percent), and "other" (12 percent).
A report containing a more detailed examination of the mobile device survey results is available from ARC. To find out how to obtain a copy, visit ARC's website.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
The Florida logistics technology startup OneRail has raised $42 million in venture backing to lift the fulfillment software company its next level of growth, the company said today.
The “series C” round was led by Los Angeles-based Aliment Capital, with additional participation from new investors eGateway Capital and Florida Opportunity Fund, as well as current investors Arsenal Growth Equity, Piva Capital, Bullpen Capital, Las Olas Venture Capital, Chicago Ventures, Gaingels and Mana Ventures. According to OneRail, the funding comes amidst a challenging funding environment where venture capital funding in the logistics sector has seen a 90% decline over the past two years.
The latest infusion follows the firm’s $33 million Series B round in 2022, and its move earlier in 2024 to acquire the Vancouver, Canada-based company Orderbot, a provider of enterprise inventory and distributed order management (DOM) software.
Orlando-based OneRail says its omnichannel fulfillment solution pairs its OmniPoint cloud software with a logistics as a service platform and a real-time, connected network of 12 million drivers. The firm says that its OmniPointsoftware automates fulfillment orchestration and last mile logistics, intelligently selecting the right place to fulfill inventory from, the right shipping mode, and the right carrier to optimize every order.
“This new funding round enables us to deepen our decision logic upstream in the order process to help solve some of the acute challenges facing retailers and wholesalers, such as order sourcing logic defaulting to closest store to customer to fulfill inventory from, which leads to split orders, out-of-stocks, or worse, cancelled orders,” OneRail Founder and CEO Bill Catania said in a release. “OneRail has revolutionized that process with a dynamic fulfillment solution that quickly finds available inventory in full, from an array of stores or warehouses within a localized radius of the customer, to meet the delivery promise, which ultimately transforms the end-customer experience.”
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.