Digitally focused startups believe there is much low-hanging fruit in traditional brokerage operations. But the fruit picking has taken an unexpected turn.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
The CEO and founder of digital startup Trucker Tools, Prasad Gollapalli, did not launch his company in 2009 with the mission to disintermediate traditional freight brokers. The Trucker Tools model was developed instead with a goal that some startups might today find counterintuitive: to help the broker.
The Reston, Va.-based company boasts that brokers can use its technology to book truck capacity several days before the next load actually needs to move. The software provides brokers with real-time visibility of loads booked through a transportation management system (TMS) or a Trucker Tools app, the trucks currently hauling their loads, and all the trucks controlled by brokers' preferred carriers but that aren't being used to haul freight for another Trucker Tools customer at that moment.
According to Gollapalli, the technology, called "Smart Capacity," offers several advantages for the broker: First, it expands a broker's universe of carriers. Second, because no one else can see which trucks are moving a broker's load, that broker has first dibs on booking the next load with the same carrier if the circumstances warrant. That is important because brokers aren't generally fond of sharing their carriers, he said.
What's more, the tracking information fed into the brokers' platforms allows them to see days ahead of time when the load will arrive. This gives brokers a jump on their future booking needs, according to Gollapalli. "Predictive capacity" technology, as it has been dubbed, has become a valuable tool in a constrained market where, in some cases, shippers desperate for capacity assurance have resorted to buying a truck's backhaul move even if they have no freight to fill it.
A CHANGE IN ATTITUDE
Gollapalli's model is designed—with apologies to Shakespeare—to "praise the broker, not to bury it." In his view, his company succeeds only if the brokers do. That attitude runs counter to the mantras of many newbies, however. If their external messaging over the past three to four years is taken at face value, they view traditional brokerage as slow-footed, inefficient, and ripe for "disruption" because its markup margins of 15 to 30 percent can be compressed by converting antiquated manual processes like phone calls and faxes to digital technology.
But a funny thing happened on the way to disruption. Digital brokers discovered that shippers wanted more from a relationship than just load-matching services that were the core of the startups' value propositions. Many of the new players thus found themselves becoming the businesses they looked to upend. This put them right in the traditional broker's wheelhouse. Meanwhile, they discovered that the digitalization of transactions was so effective at margin compression that it was squeezing them as well.
One of the more well-known digital brokers, Seattle-based Convoy, has a profit margin of about 2 percent, according to a person familiar with the privately held company's financial situation. (Convoy CEO Dan Lewis was unavailable to comment.) Other startups like New York-based Transfix and San Francisco-based Uber Freight are struggling to gain profitable traction. The companies holding themselves out as "digital marketplaces" have combined annual revenue of $450 million, according to the person. That is a fraction of share in a business estimated by consultancy Armstrong & Associates at $167 billion a year in revenue. "Right now, everyone is making nothing," said the person.
An exception is Greenwich, Conn.-based XPO Logistics Inc., which started life as a broker and could be considered a newbie because it is just seven years old. XPO has been making money hand over fist over the past couple of years, and it invested massive amounts of upfront money in information technology (IT). But all that technology wasn't put in place to disintermediate incumbent brokers, according to Troy Cooper, XPO's president. "The key with digital solutions is to give customers [the] confidence in choosing the company behind the technology," he said in an e-mail.
Gollapalli of Trucker Tools hints that startups may have perceived brokerage as an industry lost in the IT wilderness. "A digital broker is no different than a traditional broker using IT," he said.
TECH HAVES AND HAVE-NOTS
In an industry populated with companies of all sizes, not everyone can afford or feels they need the latest technology. Many brokers still rely heavily on manual processes and thus lack access to real-time data needed to find a qualified and available carrier and to secure capacity quickly.
The large legacy brokers, though, are certainly IT-savvy. J.B. Hunt Transport Services Inc., the Lowell, Ark.-based giant that operates four divisions including brokerage, utilizes a platform known as "J.B. Hunt 360" that is "years ahead of others" in terms of transparency, scale, and the richness and precision of information, according to C. Thomas Barnes, president of project44, a Chicago-based logistics IT provider. Project44 recently signed an agreement to be Hunt's backbone for an application programming interface (API). API integrations allow shippers, carriers, and third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) to exchange data through a format that directly links their databases rather than exchanging information through a neutral format like electronic data interchange (EDI).
Some companies that were IT providers and brokers have since parted ways with their brokerage license. Cargo Chief, a Millbrae, Calif.-based company founded in 2012, relinquished its brokerage license in January 2017 (all brokers must be licensed by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration) to focus on IT services. Kyle Wilson, one of Cargo Chief's co-founders, said it decided to go the IT route after hearing from brokers and 3PLs that its technology was superior to anything they could find elsewhere.
Another factor, Wilson said, was a potential conflict of interest with brokers. "If we remained a broker, our clients would never fully trust or engage with us for fear of us taking their carriers," he said.
A BOON TO THE INDUSTRY?
Abtin Hamidi, a Cargo Chief co-founder and now vice president at Los Angeles-based broker and IT firm Cargomatic Inc., said digital brokers have been a boon to the industry at large because they have introduced tools that help everyone improve their processes and drive out costs. According to Hamidi, the new players have succeeded in identifying the top two or three pain points in moving a load—for example, the human cost of acquiring a customer. Hamidi estimates that it costs, on average, $4,300 for a broker to acquire one customer that promises one load; he arrives at that data point by dividing salesforce wages and benefits by the number of customers. Digital brokers have said they could reduce that expense by 85 percent, on average, he said.
Digital brokers have also been instrumental in aligning the best interests of all stakeholders, according to Hamidi. Large shippers are notorious for "beating up" their brokers by tendering more loads and expecting lower rates, a practice that many big brokers have long resented, he said. A digital broker operating at a lower cost structure is more willing to take that business at the rate the shipper wants, he added. The large broker sheds low-yielding business, and the shipper gets coverage at a better price, he said.
Hamidi said that digital brokers didn't set up shop to steal business from legacy brokers, adding that established players have appreciated their contributions. "We've had a wonderful reaction" from the legacy players to Cargomatic's efforts, he maintained.
Barnes of project44, who worked in the brokerage trenches for years, doesn't buy the kumbaya moment. As he sees it, the startups that focus on digitalization and are also licensed brokers are, in reality, working as brokers that want to capture market share from the established companies. He acknowledged, however, that the new players have served a purpose by calling attention to the industry's digital shortcomings. "They are pushing everyone to be better," he said.
Gollapalli of Trucker Tools echoed that sentiment. "They have created an awareness throughout the industry that the status quo is not great," he said.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."