Hurricane Harvey took a physical and emotional toll on the city of Houston. Area businesses and families were faced with the overwhelming task of reconstructing their lives, homes and companies. The region has recovered strongly since then. Yet there is always the temptation to relax into complacency and believe that a disaster of this magnitude will never reoccur.
Focusing on short-term vs. long-term objectives is a common trap for many recovering businesses after a disaster. Unfortunately, some organizations don't learn much from their experiences and sit idle until the next event occurs. The key to avoiding this scenario is to have a tested disaster recovery plan already in place.
The first step in creating a disaster recovery plan is to conduct an internal risk assessment to determine the potential impact of a pending disaster on the day-to-day and long-term operations. This will enable you to account for different scenarios that may arise and test the disaster preparedness plan you've selected.
Next, identify the impact that each scenario would have on your business and outline the cost to mitigate the potential risk or the recovery interval after the disaster. Several factors such as flooding, lack of power, and the inability to get staffed were all present during Harvey. How companies responded to those challenges correlated with how quickly and strongly they recovered.
Prioritize the steps within your plan. Look at your organization and understand what components of a disaster would debilitate you, what your internal risks are, and prioritize based on that. For example, the first 24 hours after an event is reserved for making sure lives are in order. To do that, you must have systems in place to keep track of and get in touch with your team. The next 24 hours and thereafter should focus on recovery of data, technology systems and physical assets and transportation network. After you have secured your team, they can get to work on restoring vital information and documents.
While using a cloud-based provider is an effective way to do this, don't rely solely on cloud providers. There needs to be safeguards in place at your office or at remote, satellite locations to account for any anomalies that may arise such as Internet or power outages during a storm.
While it's imperative to have an established disaster preparedness plan in place, it's useless if you have not tested it. For example, if you have sent members of your team to work from higher ground in the event of flooding, have you tested to make sure that they have power where they are located? If they have power, do they have internet? If they have connectivity, do they have access to your network?
For those managing large-scale logistics operations, there should be a plan in place to consider the use and integration of third-party logistics (3PL) providers to fill in gaps created by the disaster. The contracts should include more than the physical aspects such as warehouses, transportation hubs and personnel. It should also encompass a tested and proven data integration model that allows you to electronically route and manage the logistics associated with your business. Make sure to test and validate the service level agreements with your backup 3PLs at least twice a year. All these things must be tested ahead of time for your plan to be effective.
The key metric in your testing process is the interval between the time a disaster occurs and when you can resume normal operations. In other words, if you have backed up your files in the cloud or rerouted operations through 3PLs, how long will it take to fully integrate and assume the operational responsibilities? These processes must be airtight before something happens.
In a crunch, many organizations discover that they don't have the resources they need to get ahead of the chaos. The ongoing trickle of obstacles hits harder and things begin to snowball before management can get a handle on what's happening. Factors such as lost customers, chargebacks and environmental problems take their toll. Many organizations don't survive. Although it will cost more up front, diligent management will prioritize the investment to put safeguards in place, develop a plan for disaster preparedness, and routinely test it.
Organizations cannot afford to function without guidelines on how to operate during and after a disaster. It's an emotional and trying time. Everyone can't help but be distracted. Having a plan in place instills a much-needed sense of control and survivability during a crisis. By consistently testing your plan, your team will also have the trust and confidence that will help them through tough times.
(Peter Edlund is a founding member and executive at DiCentral, a global B2B supply chain integration company based in Houston. He is the host of DiCentral's Connected, a video podcast that discusses current EDI trends with leading supply chain experts. He resides in the Houston area.)
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.