Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
If you've been keeping up with goings-on in Washington, then you're aware of policy changes implemented earlier this year that are affecting U.S. businesses. What you might not know is that two in particular—changes in tax law under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, and the imposition of tariffs on a wide range of products—could have a direct impact on companies that buy, sell, or manufacture forklift trucks and parts in the United States.
Here's a look at what the federal government's actions on taxes and trade could mean for forklift buyers and suppliers. This article is intended to provide general information; be sure to consult your tax and customs-compliance advisers for guidance on how these changes will affect your company.
FINDING TREASURE IN TAXES
By all accounts, 2018 is a good year to invest in capital equipment, including forklifts. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, passed by Congress in late December, included provisions that make it advantageous to buy equipment now.
One such provision allows many companies to write off capital equipment more quickly than in the past. Specifically, revisions to Section 179 of U.S. tax law allow qualified businesses to deduct more of the cost of new and used equipment, up to a specified limit, and fully deduct it in the same year the property is placed in service, rather than having to depreciate it over a number of years, explains Susan Rice, program manager for Raymond Leasing, a division of forklift maker The Raymond Corp. "Section 179 targets small to medium profitable corporations—you have to be profitable to get the benefit," she notes.
The new law also doubled the maximum deduction allowed under Section 179 to $1 million from $500,000 per year. In addition, it increased the phase-out threshold (the point after which the tax deduction is gradually reduced, or "phased out") for equipment that is eligible for Section 179 to $2.5 million from $2 million. (For more information, see forklift dealer Brodie ToyotaLift's article about Section 179 deductions. The post includes links to a tax-savings calculator published by Section179.org, an organization that promotes the provision's benefits for businesses.)
There's good news for businesses that spend more than $2.5 million per year on capital equipment too. All companies can apply "bonus depreciation" to amounts over the $2.5 million limit, according to Rice. Previously, bonus depreciation allowed buyers to write off 50 percent of the value of new equipment in its first year of service. That has doubled, to 100 percent for qualified equipment acquired and placed in service before Jan. 1, 2023. Bonus depreciation can also now be applied to used equipment. But some restrictions apply, as the saying goes. Most importantly, you must be the first owner of the used piece of equipment, Rice points out. For example, if you use a forklift under an operating lease (i.e., transfer of ownership is not included in the lease) and you buy the residual lease from the leasing company, you become the first owner of what is now used equipment and can write off 100 percent of that residual value in the first year of ownership.
In addition, changes to the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) may affect those who lease forklifts. As Rice explains it, capital leases—which depreciate over time, are counted as debt, and typically transfer ownership at the end of the term—are treated as an asset on the company balance sheet. By contrast, operating leases, which do not involve transfer of ownership, are currently treated as operating expenses on the income statement. But effective Jan. 1, 2019, that will change, as both operating and capital leases lasting more than 12 months will be treated as assets on balance sheets.
These changes in depreciation and accounting rules may cause some companies to revisit the lease vs. buy decision, Rice says, but there are still situations where leasing may be preferable. Much depends on individual circumstances, she says, adding, "We tell customers that every company should consult their tax adviser to understand what opportunities these changes may provide to their organizations."
TANGLING OVER TARIFFS
Both 2016 and 2017 set consecutive records for U.S. forklift sales. So far, 2018 appears to be on the same course. Sales are running higher than at this time last year, according to Brian Feehan, president of the Industrial Truck Association (ITA). "All the economic forecasts we've seen for 2019 are looking good as well," he says. "We're hoping there are no major disruptions."
The potential disruptions Feehan refers to could come from tariffs imposed earlier this year by the Trump administration and from possible changes to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). A 25-percent tariff on steel from numerous countries, including the United States' biggest trading partners, that took effect June 1 has raised production costs for U.S.-made lift trucks and parts that include imported steel. Some observers expect prices for U.S.-made steel will also rise as tariffs on imports take some of the pricing pressure off U.S. steel producers.
That's just one of the ways tariffs could affect forklift buyers and suppliers. A second round of tariffs, which took effect early last month, will raise the costs of some forklifts imported from China. Previously, Chinese-made powered industrial trucks, like all foreign-manufactured forklifts, entered the U.S. duty-free. But the 25-percent tariffs on $34 billion of Chinese-manufactured goods that took effect July 6 apply to several categories of electric and nonelectric rider-type forklifts as well as some parts and components. According to U.S. Department of Commerce figures quoted by ITA, industrial trucks and parts worth approximately $538 million were imported from China in 2017; the 25-percent tariff would add an estimated $134 million to the cost of those items. Examples of Chinese-made forklifts sold in the United States include the Baoli, Liu Gong, Hangcha, Heli, Noblelift, and BYD brands. A few U.S.-based companies sell trucks manufactured in China under their own brands and/or include Chinese-made parts in forklifts they assemble here.
Currently, China imposes a 9-percent duty on U.S.-made industrial trucks. If it should decide to add a retaliatory 25-percent tariff on top of that, that would add $13 million in costs to the $53 million of U.S.-made equipment sold in that country in 2017, according to the Commerce Department and ITA. The organization's position is that all tariffs on lift trucks should be eliminated, Feehan says.
While the battle over tariffs has heated up, NAFTA negotiations are on hiatus. The biggest worry for lift truck makers is that the U.S. could make good on President Trump's threat to do away with the trade pact if he does not get the concessions he wants. The United States has also threatened to temporarily suspend the treaty until negotiations have concluded to its satisfaction.
U.S. lift truck makers agree that NAFTA needs modernization to reflect today's business climate, expand U.S. manufacturing, and make American products more competitive. But, Feehan cautions, "let's not lose sight of the fact that it's been very valuable to all three parties. From the forklift industry's perspective, NAFTA has been extremely effective."
The numbers make that crystal clear. The U.S. exports more than $900 million of powered industrial trucks annually to Canada and Mexico, with a combined trade surplus with those countries exceeding $460 million in 2016. Should NAFTA be eliminated or temporarily suspended, U.S.-made forklifts that are now exported duty-free to Canada and Mexico could be subject to duties. That could lead Canadian and Mexican buyers to buy more lift trucks from other countries, Feehan says, jeopardizing U.S. jobs and a thriving U.S. manufacturing industry.
RAYS OF HOPE
What does all this mean for forklift buyers? For some, higher prices may be on the horizon. With so many countries subject to the steel tariff, manufacturers' production costs will rise. If they purchase more expensive U.S.-made steel instead, production costs will still go up. Either way, those added costs could be passed on to customers. (U.S. manufacturers may apply to the Department of Commerce for exemption from the tariffs, but companies that have done so have reported a burdensome application process and glacially slow response from the government, if they received one at all.)
The impact of tariffs on Chinese forklifts and parts is less certain. To mitigate those added costs, manufacturers could shift some production from China to the U.S., or they could import equipment from factories located outside of China. But manufacturing can't turn on a dime, which means forklift makers that already have global production networks in place are best positioned to weather the tariff storm.
One of those is Kion North America, part of Kion Group, the world's second-largest provider of lift trucks. Kion Group, which owns the Linde, Baoli, Still, and Dematic brands, has manufacturing plants worldwide, including in the U.S. and China. "As a member of a global supply chain, Kion North America is certainly being affected by the recently imposed tariffs," said Vincent Halma, president and chief executive officer, in an e-mail to DC Velocity. "Changes within supply chains, including tariffs, are a regular occurrence and simply part of being a global company. However, because we are a global company, that also enables us to find a solution to ensure this is just a bump in the road. To minimize the effects on our distribution network and customers, the solution will be multifaceted, including, but not limited to, in-depth cost analysis on existing products and leveraging other areas of our global supply chain." The company will continue to monitor the situation closely and make adjustments as necessary, he said.
There's one ray of hope. It's possible that the considerable tax benefits afforded by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 could cancel out, or at least substantially mitigate, higher industrial truck prices. But that—like so much involving government policy these days—remains to be seen.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.