Start me up: Opportunity charging or fast charging?
Both methods are designed to get DC equipment up and running faster—and keep it running longer—than with conventional charging. So which is best for your operation?
Victoria Kickham started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for DC Velocity.
Demand for longer-running lift trucks has given rise to opportunity charging and fast charging of batteries, both of which are aimed at expediting the charging process, reducing downtime, and freeing up space for other activities when compared with conventional charging. The ultimate goal? Getting warehouse and DC equipment started up even faster and running longer throughout the day to increase productivity.
While interest in both methods is creating industry buzz, it's also driving the need for increased education on the part of battery and charger manufacturers and their dealers. "It's common for customers using conventional charging to want to go to opportunity or fast charging, but they don't know if it's a good fit," says Jeff Harrison, business manager for Troy, Ohio-based charger manufacturer Ametek-Prestolite Power. As a result, suppliers say they're spending considerable time going over the what, why, and how of opportunity charging and fast charging with customers.
So what do these terms mean and how do the various methods stack up? What follows is a look at the key differences between conventional charging, opportunity charging, and fast charging and what may be right for your operation.
SPEEDING UP THE PROCESS
In a nutshell, opportunity and fast charging speed up the battery charging process. Along the way, they also help eliminate some of the labor and maintenance associated with conventional charging.
For most of battery history, conventional charging was the only way to charge a lead-acid lift truck battery. Simply put, with conventional charging, a facility has one or more batteries that are "changed out" when they are drained of power—that is, they are removed from the lift truck and connected to a charging system. The batteries are charged for eight hours, cooled for eight hours, and then put back into use. The process requires a designated battery space where charging and other maintenance activities are performed. Depending on the operation, the process could take up considerable real estate inside a warehouse or DC—not to mention the time and effort needed for the change-out process, and the need for multiple batteries for heavy-use and/or multiple-shift operations.
"That was the traditional way we did it up until 15 years ago," Harrison explains. "Then, some smart people said, 'Let's recharge faster so we don't have to take [the battery] out of the truck.'"
The result was opportunity charging, which is done throughout the workday when the lift truck is not in use—during lunchtime and other short breaks, for example. With opportunity charging, the battery remains in the lift truck and is plugged into a charger; larger facilities often have banks of charging stations for this purpose. Maintenance is reduced—no more changing, charging, and cooling of multiple batteries throughout the day. Instead, maintenance is performed weekly and monthly, including a regular equalize charge.
But the story doesn't end there. "Then, [researchers] said, 'Let's increase the rate so we can charge it even faster," Harrison says. "And now we have fast charging."
Like opportunity charging, fast charging is done throughout the day, without removing the battery from the lift truck. The key difference between the two methods is the start rate when charging the battery; start rate refers to the amount of current you're putting back into the battery at the start of the charge. As Harrison explains, charging happens on a curve, with the most current going in at the start before tapering off and ending at about a 5-percent rate. Speeding up the charging process happens at the beginning of that cycle. Quite simply, fast charging utilizes a faster start rate, further accelerating the charging process so that you get even more use out of your equipment per shift.
As an example, consider a 1,000 amp-hour battery. The start rate for conventional charging is about 20 percent, meaning that you're putting 200 DC amps back into that battery at the start of the charge. The start rate for opportunity charging is about 25 percent, meaning that you're putting 250 DC amps back into the battery at the start. The start rate for fast-charging applications is 35 percent or more, Harrison says.
Speeding up the charging process via opportunity charging and fast charging allows the lift truck to be used more continuously throughout a shift and for multiple shifts, often allowing facilities to reduce both the number of batteries and the amount of equipment they need. Thus, the cost savings add up: in lower capital expenditures, higher productivity, and lower maintenance costs.
BALANCING THE RISKS
Although the pros of opportunity and fast-charging methods are pretty clear—cost savings, higher productivity, and safety and maintenance improvements—experts caution that the methods are not for everyone. As Mike Hagen, vice president of sales and marketing for Menomonee Falls, Wis.-based battery and charger maker Storage Battery Systems LLC, explains, opportunity charging simply means that you're charging the battery more often and using higher charge currents to keep your equipment up and running. This can be ideal for operations running multiple shifts, as it allows them to save the time spent changing out, charging, and cooling their batteries daily.
Likewise, fast charging may be ideal in situations with heavy equipment use—for example, an automotive plant running six days a week and looking to reduce liability concerns associated with employees frequently changing out large, heavy batteries; free up valuable floor space previously needed for battery changing rooms; and reduce labor costs by eliminating time lost changing batteries.
But there is one big "con" with both methods, and it can outweigh the benefits if the conditions aren't right: reduced battery life.
Think of your battery as a car that will run a certain number of miles before it wears out. The faster you put those miles on, the sooner you will need to replace it.
"Batteries still have a finite [amount of use]," Harrison explains. "Opportunity charging and fast charging don't change that."
In fact, they can accelerate the process by exposing the battery to more heat, which can wear it down faster.
"You still get the same amount of work out of the battery, you're just getting through the life of the battery faster because you are using it more," Harrison explains, adding that proper care and monitoring is crucial to getting peak performance out of any lead-acid battery, regardless of the charging method. "That's taking a while for end users to grasp. Instead of getting five to seven years out of [a battery], you may get a year less."
Hagen adds that while both opportunity charging and fast charging shorten the life of the battery, fast charging is the quickest way to wear the battery out.
"You're going to have to change out the battery sooner by fast charging or by opportunity charging—but you'll have to replace the battery even sooner with fast charging," he says, adding that fast charging equates to overcharging the battery, which hastens its ultimate demise. "The benefits of fast and opportunity charging are getting amp hours back into the battery throughout the day versus getting a full depth of discharge and recharging fully. The negative is ... that it's just not good for the battery."
But again, the risk makes sense in certain situations—especially when balancing the cost of reduced battery life with investing in multiple batteries and equipment up front. Smaller operations running one shift are unlikely to see the same productivity gains from either opportunity or fast charging that their larger counterparts running multiple shifts will—especially if they're using equipment less or for lighter-duty tasks. Such operations may end up shortening battery life unnecessarily, Hagen says.
It's worth noting that fast charging makes up a small portion of the battery and charger market today. Harrison estimates that fast chargers represent less than 10 percent of the market compared with conventional and opportunity-charging systems. Opportunity charging is far more widespread, Hagen and Harrison agree.
KNOW YOUR NEEDS
Weighing the pros and cons of conventional charging, opportunity charging, and fast charging is no easy task. That's why Harrison, Hagen, and others recommend that customers begin with a "power study" of their facility's equipment and environment to determine the best option. Such studies are usually conducted by a battery/charger dealer and utilize monitoring equipment placed on all batteries in use. Using sensors and software, the monitoring system tracks conditions such as amp-hour usage and idle time. The dealer also considers how the equipment is used and the environmental factors at play—such as temperature and humidity—as well as utility costs and related issues.
Brian Faust, general manager for Reading, Pa.-based battery, charger, and accessories maker Douglas Battery, says such studies can make or break a company's charging optimization initiative. Douglas Battery recommends running a power study for two weeks, although 30 days is preferable if time allows, to establish the best charging method and equipment required.
"There is no particular market segment best suited to fast charging or opportunity charging. It all depends on a particular customer's demand out of their equipment," he explains. "And the power study is the key to determining which of the three [methods] is quoted. Not doing one and just selling a customer a program can mean that they don't get the results they want, or that they spend too much or too little ...
"You have to be able to do your due diligence. If you're not doing power studies, you're not doing your customer justice."
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.