If anyone understands how to safely operate lift trucks, it's the companies that design and manufacture the equipment. A look at how they train their own employees reveals best practices any forklift fleet can adopt.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Suppose you've just bought a new lawn tractor or snow blower. If you've never used one of these machines before, the logical place to turn for instruction is the manufacturer. Even if you do have experience with these types of equipment, there are enough differences among makes and models that you'll still need guidance on how to use a particular machine safely and correctly.
The same principle applies to industrial trucks. Drivers must know how to safely operate specific types of forklifts in the particular environment where they will be working. And, since nobody knows their products better than the companies that designed and built them, it stands to reason that the manufacturers' own factories, warehouses, and distribution centers would have exemplary forklift safety records. That's why we asked several OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) how they train their own employees and what they think are the most effective ways to deliver that training. Here's what they had to say.
FOLLOW THE LEADER
Above all else, the OEMs emphasized the importance of creating a safety-focused culture. That means ensuring that everyone makes safety a top priority and understands his or her responsibility to provide a safe workplace for forklift operators and pedestrians alike. That begins with the employer, who has to provide the necessary training and support employees need to help prevent accidents and injuries, says Pat O'Connor, lead service trainer in UniCarriers Americas' training department.
Forklift operators have a responsibility to comply with safety standards and follow the rules and safe practices they learn during their training, of course. "Operators have to understand that these are powerful machines, and they can't check out during the training," says Tom Lego, national manager of training and customer center for Toyota Material Handling U.S.A. (TMHU). "They must take training seriously, and they need to understand and respect the equipment. Operating safely is a responsibility, not an option."
As for the training itself, OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) rule 1910.178 (Powered Industrial Truck Standard) mandates that all lift truck operators receive specialized training by certified instructors. This instruction should include, but not be limited to, classroom instruction and hands-on training that is site-specific and is followed by an exam, says Marty Boyd, vice president, product planning and solutions for Greenville, N.C.-based Hyster Co.
OSHA recommends that new operators undergo a one-day eight-hour operator-training course, O'Connor says. At its Marengo, Ill., manufacturing plant and parts distribution center, UniCarriers uses traditional lectures with PowerPoint slides as well as videos that cover specific points of the training. Instructors then demonstrate the activities they've just discussed on a lift truck, and the students perform that same activity as the instructor guides them through it and points out where they need improvement.
In its facilities, Hyster uses the same safety training and awareness materials it offers to customers, including its OSHA-compliant "Best In Class" operator-training program for lift truck classes I through V, Boyd says. The program allows trainers to customize the instruction for the specific facility, environment, and equipment operators will use, as required by OSHA. (See sidebar for more about the training resources offered by forklift manufacturers.)
Because training must be site-specific, employers are the ones who certify that the operator has been properly trained. That's true even for temporary workers, says J. Scott Bicksler, lead safety manager for Aerotek Inc., a global recruiting and staffing agency. "It's important to remember that forklift certification is NOT portable. The policies, procedures, and processes may be totally different from company to company, and they may have totally different forklifts," he says.
One example of site-specific instruction for people and applications can be found in Columbus, Ind., where Toyota Industrial Equipment Manufacturing (TIEM) produces Toyota forklifts for the North American market. Like other OEMs, the company must train not only operators who move parts and materials within those facilities, but also employees who move trucks from one production stage to another, those who conduct quality tests after each truck comes off the assembly line, and sales representatives who will be demonstrating models for dealers and customers. All of them must train on every model they will be operating, regardless of how briefly that might be, Lego says.
Within Toyota's plant is a safety training dojo, a Japanese term that will be familiar to martial arts students and literally means "exercise hall." TIEM's dojo is a dedicated area where a safety trainer conducts classroom and hands-on instruction and documents trainees' certification in compliance with OSHA standards. The dojo also simulates the operating environment, with an obstacle course, marking and signage forklift operators will encounter out on the floor, and different types of racks and loads for practicing pickup and putaway. A life-sized representation of the back end of a trailer allows operators to practice maneuvering in a tight space.
TEST IT AGAIN, SAM
OSHA requires that operators be tested and recertified in the mandated trainings every three years. But that's just the baseline, and experts we consulted agreed that refresher training shouldn't be limited to the minimum.
UniCarriers' safety training team conducts a half-day to full-day forklift safety refresher, depending on the material that needs to be covered, O'Connor says. But, he adds, refresher training can take less time, provided that an appropriately experienced instructor communicates the material properly, and that the operator is sufficiently re-familiarized with the material to pass the required tests and be certified.
Some employers schedule refresher training as often as once a year. That's the case at Toyota, which annually recertifies employees who make heavy daily use of lift trucks. Average users and sales staff go through recertification every two years and every three years, respectively, Lego says.
There are circumstances when training outside the planned schedule is both appropriate and wise—for example, whenever new equipment is introduced to the facility or when the facility layout or flow changes, Hyster's Boyd says. Furthermore, OSHA requires remedial training for operators involved in accidents or near-accidents, he adds.
Sometimes, an individual needs additional training for other reasons. For instance, lift truck operators can easily fall into bad habits, like taking shortcuts that cause safety, quality, or productivity problems, Lego notes. In those cases, he says, instructors should help operators refocus on doing things the right way, so their actions don't have adverse effects on standard procedures and safety.
Experienced operators, though, may question the need for remedial training. One way to respond is to acknowledge that they are undoubtedly good at what they do and then explain the critical importance of safe procedures and why they need a refresher in a particular area or procedure. "They are skilled workers, and it's important to treat them with respect," O'Connor says.
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF TECHNOLOGY
Because OSHA requires classroom and hands-on training, there is definitely still a role for "old-fashioned" instructional methods like classroom lectures, Hyster's Boyd points out. And there is simply no substitute for hands-on training on the truck itself. But there's no need for safety managers to limit training to those methods, nor should they, he says. Instead, trainers are free to use other methods to supplement—not replace—what's mandated by the regulation.
One common way to do that is through videos. This allows trainees to view and learn from situations that can't be replicated at their facility. O'Connor cites the example of forklift accidents. "A lot of workers have never seen accidents," which is a good thing, he says. But it's critical that they understand how they happen and what the consequences are. Showing them accidents in a video or photos "wakes them up" and reinforces the seriousness of the lesson, he says.
Another way to use videos is to show safe operation in different work environments and situations. "Each environment is different, and they all come with their own safety requirements, hazards, and cautions," O'Connor says. "A video can demonstrate that without physically going there. But of course you always reinforce that information with hands-on practice."
A fast-growing trend in supplemental instruction that's quickly gaining fans is virtual reality for operator training. In the past few years, several companies, including Yale Materials Handling Corp., Hyster Co., The Raymond Corp., FL-Simulators, NextWave Safety Solutions Inc., and Tactus Technologies, have developed products that simulate forklift operation using virtual reality (VR). The trainee dons the VR headset while seated in either an actual stationary forklift or a console that replicates a forklift's controls. The student then proceeds through a series of exercises under the close watch of a trainer. Depending on the vendor, the simulation may apply to specific forklift models or types of trucks, and the "scenery" will be either standard images or images customized to mimic the user's actual warehouse environment.
Learning to operate a lift truck in a virtual environment does not replace the valuable experience a student gets from operating a truck in an actual warehouse or DC, says Dave Norton, Raymond's vice president of corporate quality and customer care. But a VR instructional tool still offers many advantages, he says. For one thing, new operators can become comfortable with the lift truck before operating it in a warehouse, without risk to people, products, or equipment. For another, operators using VR can be more confident and practiced in handling different warehouse scenarios, including incident avoidance and emergency maneuvers. VR can also provide a safe way to evaluate job candidates' skills before they take a "road test." And it can help instructors identify employees' strengths and weaknesses so instruction can be tailored to individual students, Norton says. In Raymond's product, he adds, instructors can view exactly what the trainee is seeing in the headset, which allows the instructor to give real-time feedback to the student.
With so many practices, strategies, and protocols to teach, forklift safety training may seem daunting. It is complex, but if you do as the forklift manufacturers do for their own employees—create a safety-focused culture, comply with the applicable regulations, conduct refresher training when needed, and use a variety of methods to provide additional instruction beyond what the regulations require—you'll have a safer work environment.
Learn from the pros
Industrial truck manufacturers want to make sure customers use their forklifts safely. Many offer operator-training resources, such as OSHA-compliant training classes, instructional and informational videos, and blogs on safety topics. Here are links to just some of the resources available from a selection of forklift brands:
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."