Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Much has changed, and continues to change, in the transportation world. But one immutable rule remains: Service providers want to be paid as soon as possible. There's another somewhat immutable rule, however: Getting paid quickly is easier said than done. Shippers have little incentive to pony up fast, even though it is good relationship practice to do so, especially in a period of tight capacity when it would seem short-sighted for a shipper to keep its carriers hanging waiting for payment.
It's Richard G. Piontek's job to smooth out the rough spots in the payment chain. As chairman of Carlsbad, Calif.-based factoring, or financial services, firm eCapital LLC, Piontek helps smaller truckers and last-mile service providers—a burgeoning segment given the growth of B2C (business-to-consumer) commerce—maintain their cash flows by getting reimbursed fast. Piontek joined eCapital in December 2016 after a multidecade stint that included the presidency of Redwood Supply Chain Solutions, a division of Redwood Logistics Inc., and leadership roles at Crowley Maritime Corp., freight forwarder and customs broker Livingston International, transport and logistics giant Schneider, and DHL's Express and Global Forwarding units.
Piontek spoke recently to Mark B. Solomon, DC Velocity's executive editor-news, about eCapital's role in the ecosystem, how it developed a niche focusing on smaller players, and the role that blockchain technology could play in facilitating the payment process.
Q: Can you describe how eCapital got started and what services you perform?
A: In 1993, our two founders met for the first time in Los Angeles. Both were originally from South Africa. Shortly after meeting, the two launched a factoring business from a spare room with not much more than a desk and a thermal-paper fax machine. They began building a partnership that has allowed us to develop an enduring business helping small companies grow and thrive by gaining access to capital. Over time, the transportation segment became the primary industry they served, and that has evolved to what is now eCapital. Over the last 25 years, we have purchased billions of dollars of invoices and helped several thousand owner/operators and small fleets succeed by providing access to capital and predictable cash flow.
We provide invoice financing, or "factoring," services to new entrants and small fleet capacity providers that are vital to the health of the U.S. truckload transportation capacity base. We manage carrier payables for brokerage-based 3PLs (third-party logistics service providers), accelerate payments to a growing list of last-mile delivery providers, and increasingly, act as a technology and services platform that powers the transportation settlement process for TMS (transportation management software) providers, visibility applications, and the new generation of digital freight matching innovators.
Q: There are a number of factoring firms that serve the transportation industry. What is different about eCapital?
A: We have a clear vision and are highly focused on the business that we're in. For us, this means we are reinventing transportation financial services by accelerating access to capital and streamlining the flow of information and funds to enable shippers, carriers, and logistics service providers to adapt, grow, and thrive in the digital age. Second, we are a business with deep knowledge and experience within the markets we serve.
Q: To what degree have last-mile providers, which have gained prominence with the expansion of B2C commerce, been underserved in the development of factoring solutions?
A: To say the segment is "underserved" might be a bit of a stretch. I think I'd qualify that by saying that it's somewhat underserved. I also think it's fair to say that on the surface, when compared with other traditional long-haul segments, last mile may not appear to have embraced invoice financing (factoring) to the same degree—but the demand is there. Some providers strictly operate intra-state and are part of larger regional carriers that hold the service contracts with shippers—they have the capacity to settle quickly. But many do not, so we help those carriers grow.
Q: Do those providers have unique factoring needs relative to the truckload carriers that have been factoring companies' traditional customers?
A: Yes. There are unique operational processes, technologies, and business rules that come into play and dictate how we efficiently process and manage last-mile transactions. Aside from that, the goal is the same: We enable owner/operators and small fleets to grow and thrive by providing predictable cash flow.
Q: What role do you see blockchain playing in the area of the industry that your company specializes in?
A: Finance and carrier settlements will be among the first, if not the first, widespread deployments for blockchain in transportation. I think blockchain will play a major role in reducing fraud, establishing security and visibility, and streamlining the entire settlement process. We are members of the Blockchain in Transport Alliance (BiTA) and look forward to working collaboratively with our peers to clear the way for progress.
Q: Are folks vesting too much in blockchain than the reality of its evolution calls for?
A: That depends on one's perspective. If you like all the information in one complete and neat package before deciding where to invest, I suppose that's one way to operate. I believe that advancements like blockchain tend to get deployed by industry leaders in about half the time that you expect. Said another way, if you think that blockchain has potential but that it won't be realized in three years, just know that the winners will usually act, implement, and change the game in half that time or probably less.
Q: Have we seen a lengthening in shippers' "days payment outstanding" (DPO) in recent years? Can you quantify it?
A: We have seen a trend of extended payment terms among commercial shippers, especially large companies. Given today's capacity crunch, it's counterintuitive as to why anyone would consider lengthening payment cycles as an effective strategy because it has obvious operational consequences. Asking carriers to finance a shipper with extended payment terms just doesn't work well today—shippers will pay for it in rates and capacity.
I have seen survey results from the National Association of Credit Management indicating that some shippers are pushing carriers to accept payment in 90 days and beyond, as compared with the average of about 37 days. Reconcile that with our brokers telling us that paying carriers quickly helps build more durable capacity relationships. On the truckload side, taking 30-day carrier payment cycles down to 24 hours makes a difference to brokers who must compete for capacity.
In any case, DPO trends should be understood by mode, as ocean freight, truckload, and parcel have different payment patterns.
Q: Have digital tools streamlined the process?
A: Yes, and they will continue to evolve and proliferate for the benefit of all supply chain participants. From automated freight payment systems and carrier payment acceleration platforms that inject capital into the transaction to broader supply chain and trade finance applications, digital tools are helping to streamline the cash-to-cash (C2C) cycle throughout the financial supply chain.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.