With only a few logs rolled, ABF, Teamsters already at loggerheads
Company warns of pension crisis that will require action; union wants to cap intermodal, purchased transportation expense, restore lost ground from 2013.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
It's still early, but talks to hammer out a collective-bargaining agreement between ABF Freight, the less-than-truckload unit of ArcBest Corp., and the 8,200 full-time Teamsters union members who work for the unit is shaping up to be just as difficult as the last go-round five years ago.
Negotiations resumed on Monday in Kansas City after two rounds of talks that moved the needle a bit, but not by much. ABF said in a memo last Friday that progress had been made on unidentified "mutually agreeable" language, but that "significant issues" remain to be discussed. The memo did not mention the core issues still on the table, but they no doubt mean employee wages, and perhaps more important, the cost of the company's pension plan, which is significantly higher than that of YRC Worldwide Inc., ABF's only unionized rival. The five-year ABF-Teamster contract expires March 31.
The two sides first exchanged proposals on Dec. 18, with the Teamsters' freight division seeking cost-of-living adjustments for each year of the contract and ABF calling for an across-the-board wage freeze effective July 1, 2018. The company has agreed to restore one week's vacation for union members that was eliminated in the 2013 contract, with the condition that the two sides identify cost savings to offset the increased expense associated with adding back the vacation week.
As part of the 2013 agreement, the rank and file took an up-front 7-percent wage cut that was to be restored in increments over the contract's life. ABF said that has happened, though some on the Teamsters side aren't so sure. Ken Paff, national organizer of the Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU), a dissident group that clashes regularly with union leadership, said the increases were actually cost-of-living adjustments pegged to levels that were adjusted downward once the 7-percent cut took effect. As a result, Paff argued, the front-ended cuts were not restored at all. ABF vehemently disagrees with that rationale.
ABF Teamsters have a reputation for not going quietly, as evidenced by the set-to through the summer and fall of 2013, when about 1,800 workers in the Midwest refused to sign off on their local supplements attached to the national master contract. The main contract had been ratified in June, but couldn't take effect until all supplements were ratified. The members threatened to authorize a strike vote, which union leaders warned could cause such a disruptive ripple effect that it would force ABF to shut down. The members backed off, however, clearing the way for the supplements to be ratified and the current contract to take effect.
The dynamics are different this time around. The U.S. economy and freight demand are in better places than they were in 2013. Less-than-truckload (LTL) carriers, which were emerging from a disastrous rate-cutting cycle in 2013, have since discovered pricing discipline, and along with perkier demand, that has emboldened them to raise prices repeatedly in recent years. Ernie Soehl has replaced Tyson Johnson as head of the union's freight division, a change which has a "jury's still out" feel to it.
The wild card is Fred Zuckerman, head of Teamsters Local 89 in Louisville, Ky., and leader of a movement called "Teamsters United." Zuckerman came within a whisker of defeating incumbent James P. Hoffa in the union's 2016 presidential election, and Teamsters United won six seats on the union's 24-member board.
Zuckerman, a voluble and aggressive leader, is expected to play a major role in shaping the union's ideology in talks with ABF and in the much-larger contract negotiations underway with UPS Inc., the Teamsters' largest employer, whose contract with the union expires in August. ABF Teamsters voted overwhelmingly for Zuckerman in the 2016 election, according to Paff.
On Tuesday, Teamsters United announced on its website that locals in Chicago; Louisville; Columbus and Dayton, Ohio; Kansas City; and Harrisburg, Pa., among others, voted to authorize Teamsters leaders to call a strike if the situation warranted it. A strike authorization vote is procedural, and doesn't automatically lead to a walkout.
On the site, the group put ABF on notice that "we are coming together to restore what we lost in the last contract and to win improvements." It added that ABF "needs to see that we will back our union negotiators when they fight for improvements, and that we will vote 'No' if they settle short and try to sell us another substandard deal."
PENSION CRISIS
The fate of the contract could very well turn on the pension gap between ABF and Overland Park, Kan.-based YRC. As part of a 2009 agreement to keep YRC solvent, its rank and file, who are also represented by the Teamsters, took draconian pension cuts, dropping their benefit to the equivalent of $1.75 an hour. The ABF pension, by contrast, provides benefits equal to $7.83 an hour, ABF said in the memo. The YRC-Teamsters collective bargaining agreement was extended for five years in 2014 and expires in March 2019.
The pension discrepancy, along with generous health and welfare benefits and wages that "are at the top pay rates" of the LTL industry, puts ABF at a cost disadvantage when competing for business, according to the memo.
Another problem facing Fort Smith, Ark.-based ABF is that about half of its pension payments go to retirees who never worked for the company. That's because ABF was part of a multi-employer pension scheme negotiated decades ago when the trucking industry was heavily unionized, regulated, generally in good financial health, and chock-full of carriers. Under the scheme, companies in the multi-employer plan were required to contribute to the pensions of each other's workers, and would continue to do so even if truckers who had employed some of those workers went out of business.
ABF, which said it has made $1 billion in pension contributions in the past decade and $750 million since the last contract, said "very little, if any, of this money" will go toward the rank and file's retirement benefits. In words that echo similar warnings made by ABF in the months leading up to the 2013 compact, the company said in the memo that unless the pension issue is resolved, "we must find other ways to achieve an affordable contract."
For its part, the union wants to establish a classification of "utility employees," who would function as cartage jacks-of-all-trades and be paid an hourly premium over other workers. It has demanded that ABF's use of rail intermodal and purchased transportation services—the latter being services not performed by union drivers—be capped at 20 percent of total annual miles, and that the level of purchased transportation not exceed 4 percent of ABF's total annual mileage. The union also proposed that for every mile driven by an outside carrier, 10 cents would go into an account whose proceeds would be equally disbursed to bargaining-unit drivers by Jan. 30 of each calendar year of the contract.
The Teamsters are sensitive to initiatives proposed by any carrier that hint at siphoning away driving work from bargaining-unit employees. The union opposes any initiatives by companies to use such equipment as autonomous vehicles and drones, though it recently withdrew its opposition to UPS using them.
In June 2012, ArcBest, then known as Arkansas Best Corp., acquired Panther, an expedited delivery provider, in an effort to add services beyond asset-based LTL. In 2013, ABF's "premium logistics and expedited freight" segment, which was composed of Panther, posted revenue of $246.8 million, a bit more than 10 percent of the company's $2.3 billion in total revenue. In 2017, the "ArcBest" unit, which is made up of Panther and the company's truckload and dedicated truckload businesses, generated revenue of more than $706 million, about 25 percent of $2.82 billion in overall revenue. The company does not break out revenue streams between Panther and the two truckload operations.
The core LTL operation generated a shade over $1.99 billion in revenue last year; in 2013, the unit's revenue was $1.76 billion.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.