Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
U.S. intermodal traffic volumes set a record in 2017, and the consensus going into 2018 is for more gains. The global economy ended last year with its best-synchronized recovery since 2010. In the U.S., ocean imports were expected to rise 7 percent over 2016 levels, according to a December survey by the National Retail Federation (NRF) and consultancy Hackett Associates. Meanwhile, already-solid domestic intermodal demand will likely be goosed if qualified over-the-road drivers remain in short supply and if the trucking industry struggles with transitioning to the federal safety mandate requiring that virtually all trucks built after the year 2000 have electronic logging devices (ELDs) onboard.
The ELD mandate, which took effect Dec. 18, could result in a conversion of highway traffic to rail if businesses believe that over-the-road drivers may not be able to meet delivery targets; the ELD rule is expected to cut driver productivity by 3 to 10 percent as drivers accustomed to fudging paper logs in order to run more miles than allowed by law are now forced by technology to stay within federal hours-of-service (HOS) limits.
But the mandate could be a doubled-edged sword for the intermodal supply chain. That's because dray drivers who haul traffic to and from intermodal ramps are required to comply unless they operate less than 100 "air" miles—roughly equivalent to 115 road miles—per road shift. There is no typical dray distance, as the lengths of haul vary widely depending on the circumstance. There is no available data to determine the percentage of non-compliant dray drivers.
A worsening overall shortage of qualified drivers, exacerbated by the cost and operational pressures of "running electronically," is likely to lead to higher wages for dray drivers and increased costs for a network still heavily dependent on the dray. Any potential problems could be amplified depending on the number of independent draymen who drop out of the business because they were unwilling to adapt to a post-Dec. 18 world. In addition, dray drivers could migrate to the over-the-road side of the business, especially given the large-scale wage increases being offered by big trucking. All of this could result in significant consolidation within the dray segment, leading to higher rates.
"THE BIG WILL GET BIGGER"
Should ELDs force dray drivers off the road, "the big will get bigger, the small will be put out of business, and prices for dray as well as long haul will increase, especially in tight local markets," said Patrick J. Ottensmeyer, president and CEO of Kansas City, Mo.-based Kansas City Southern Railway Co. (KCS), one of the seven Class I rail carriers in North America.
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc., the Eden Prairie, Minn.-based broker and third-party logistics service provider (3PL) and one of the top five users of U.S. intermodal services, is bracing for what Phil Shook, the company's intermodal director, called a "significant shift in drayage rates" partially caused by a tightening driver market. In an interview in early January, Shook said some drayage firms are mulling a shift to a time-based pricing formula rather than one based on mileage in part because of the ELD mandate.
On Jan. 10, Overland Park, Kan.-based 3PL MIQ Logistics warned in an e-mail that drayage rates have escalated due to stronger demand, a shrinking driver pool, and the effect of delays and long wait times at ports and chassis yards, which make it harder for dray drivers to hit their delivery targets and stay within the HOS limits. Winter storm Grayson, which battered the Eastern Seaboard in early January and either shut down or curtailed operations at multiple ports, also took a toll on dray capacity, the company said.
Because dray is inherently a short-haul move, many drivers, by definition, can operate roundtrips and remain within the mandate's "100 air mile" geographic limit. However, many others routinely put more daily roundtrip miles than that on their rigs. James Hertwig, who retired at the end of 2017 as president and chief executive officer of Jacksonville-based Florida East Coast Railway (FEC), said there were more than a few times when goods scheduled to move via less-than-truckload (LTL) to FEC's rail head in Jacksonville had to instead be trucked there via dray because the LTL trailer lacked sufficient density to make the run at the time required to hit FEC's cutoff.
Larger dray fleets are, for the most part, already equipped with ELDs. However, much of the nation's dray hauling is handled by owner-operators, the segment of the driver community who've so far been the most challenged by ELD compliance requirements.
Then there is the overarching problem of driver undersupply, which affects draymen as it does long-haul truckload types. Shook of C.H. Robinson perhaps best summed up the industry's predicament by saying he was recently told by a large trucker that it had more manpower allocated to recruiting drivers than to soliciting freight.
MARKET UPHEAVAL
All of this comes as the railroads and the intermodal community confront a profound change in how product is ordered and distributed. Rising e-commerce demand and the accompanying shift in order fulfillment patterns will require inventory to be dispersed across a large number of DCs located closer to the customers. The railroads are handling their share of e-commerce—the Intermodal Association of North America (IANA) reported a 7.7-percent increase in 2017 in the use of 28-foot trailer "pups," the type of equipment utilized to haul the smaller, lighter-weight goods that are most commonly ordered online.
However, e-commerce's distribution characteristics run counter to the railroads' traditional model of clustering operations in select large-volume terminals, said Larry Gross, a long-time rail consultant. The solution, according to Gross, would be to create a network of secondary terminals near the freight. However, that creates challenges of its own because the vast length of intermodal trains would make it difficult for smaller terminals to serve them. How the supply chain configures the drayage network to respond to these secular changes in distribution will be a story to play out in 2018 and beyond.
The remedy for sustaining timely and reliable dray service in a post-Dec. 18 world lies, as it has with virtually every supply chain management challenge, in more timely and efficient operations. Shook said greater emphasis will be placed on such basic blocking-and-tackling processes as "drop-and-hook," where a full trailer's availability is synchronized with a truck's arrival so a driver can dump an empty trailer, hook up a full one, and be on his or her way.
But the ultimate responsibility lies with the railroads, according to Ottensmeyer of KCS. "Where ELDs could have a direct impact on dray carriers is when train service deteriorates in terms of on-time-performance and predictability," Ottensmeyer said in an e-mail. "A driver waiting will consume hours of service, so if a driver had planned to make two dray runs and the second incoming load is delayed on rail, he or she may run out of hours before completing both runs." The same scenario applies at cargo owners' facilities, where loading dock productivity at a warehouse can impact waiting times for drivers, he added.
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.