Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
U.S. intermodal traffic volumes set a record in 2017, and the consensus going into 2018 is for more gains. The global economy ended last year with its best-synchronized recovery since 2010. In the U.S., ocean imports were expected to rise 7 percent over 2016 levels, according to a December survey by the National Retail Federation (NRF) and consultancy Hackett Associates. Meanwhile, already-solid domestic intermodal demand will likely be goosed if qualified over-the-road drivers remain in short supply and if the trucking industry struggles with transitioning to the federal safety mandate requiring that virtually all trucks built after the year 2000 have electronic logging devices (ELDs) onboard.
The ELD mandate, which took effect Dec. 18, could result in a conversion of highway traffic to rail if businesses believe that over-the-road drivers may not be able to meet delivery targets; the ELD rule is expected to cut driver productivity by 3 to 10 percent as drivers accustomed to fudging paper logs in order to run more miles than allowed by law are now forced by technology to stay within federal hours-of-service (HOS) limits.
But the mandate could be a doubled-edged sword for the intermodal supply chain. That's because dray drivers who haul traffic to and from intermodal ramps are required to comply unless they operate less than 100 "air" miles—roughly equivalent to 115 road miles—per road shift. There is no typical dray distance, as the lengths of haul vary widely depending on the circumstance. There is no available data to determine the percentage of non-compliant dray drivers.
A worsening overall shortage of qualified drivers, exacerbated by the cost and operational pressures of "running electronically," is likely to lead to higher wages for dray drivers and increased costs for a network still heavily dependent on the dray. Any potential problems could be amplified depending on the number of independent draymen who drop out of the business because they were unwilling to adapt to a post-Dec. 18 world. In addition, dray drivers could migrate to the over-the-road side of the business, especially given the large-scale wage increases being offered by big trucking. All of this could result in significant consolidation within the dray segment, leading to higher rates.
"THE BIG WILL GET BIGGER"
Should ELDs force dray drivers off the road, "the big will get bigger, the small will be put out of business, and prices for dray as well as long haul will increase, especially in tight local markets," said Patrick J. Ottensmeyer, president and CEO of Kansas City, Mo.-based Kansas City Southern Railway Co. (KCS), one of the seven Class I rail carriers in North America.
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc., the Eden Prairie, Minn.-based broker and third-party logistics service provider (3PL) and one of the top five users of U.S. intermodal services, is bracing for what Phil Shook, the company's intermodal director, called a "significant shift in drayage rates" partially caused by a tightening driver market. In an interview in early January, Shook said some drayage firms are mulling a shift to a time-based pricing formula rather than one based on mileage in part because of the ELD mandate.
On Jan. 10, Overland Park, Kan.-based 3PL MIQ Logistics warned in an e-mail that drayage rates have escalated due to stronger demand, a shrinking driver pool, and the effect of delays and long wait times at ports and chassis yards, which make it harder for dray drivers to hit their delivery targets and stay within the HOS limits. Winter storm Grayson, which battered the Eastern Seaboard in early January and either shut down or curtailed operations at multiple ports, also took a toll on dray capacity, the company said.
Because dray is inherently a short-haul move, many drivers, by definition, can operate roundtrips and remain within the mandate's "100 air mile" geographic limit. However, many others routinely put more daily roundtrip miles than that on their rigs. James Hertwig, who retired at the end of 2017 as president and chief executive officer of Jacksonville-based Florida East Coast Railway (FEC), said there were more than a few times when goods scheduled to move via less-than-truckload (LTL) to FEC's rail head in Jacksonville had to instead be trucked there via dray because the LTL trailer lacked sufficient density to make the run at the time required to hit FEC's cutoff.
Larger dray fleets are, for the most part, already equipped with ELDs. However, much of the nation's dray hauling is handled by owner-operators, the segment of the driver community who've so far been the most challenged by ELD compliance requirements.
Then there is the overarching problem of driver undersupply, which affects draymen as it does long-haul truckload types. Shook of C.H. Robinson perhaps best summed up the industry's predicament by saying he was recently told by a large trucker that it had more manpower allocated to recruiting drivers than to soliciting freight.
MARKET UPHEAVAL
All of this comes as the railroads and the intermodal community confront a profound change in how product is ordered and distributed. Rising e-commerce demand and the accompanying shift in order fulfillment patterns will require inventory to be dispersed across a large number of DCs located closer to the customers. The railroads are handling their share of e-commerce—the Intermodal Association of North America (IANA) reported a 7.7-percent increase in 2017 in the use of 28-foot trailer "pups," the type of equipment utilized to haul the smaller, lighter-weight goods that are most commonly ordered online.
However, e-commerce's distribution characteristics run counter to the railroads' traditional model of clustering operations in select large-volume terminals, said Larry Gross, a long-time rail consultant. The solution, according to Gross, would be to create a network of secondary terminals near the freight. However, that creates challenges of its own because the vast length of intermodal trains would make it difficult for smaller terminals to serve them. How the supply chain configures the drayage network to respond to these secular changes in distribution will be a story to play out in 2018 and beyond.
The remedy for sustaining timely and reliable dray service in a post-Dec. 18 world lies, as it has with virtually every supply chain management challenge, in more timely and efficient operations. Shook said greater emphasis will be placed on such basic blocking-and-tackling processes as "drop-and-hook," where a full trailer's availability is synchronized with a truck's arrival so a driver can dump an empty trailer, hook up a full one, and be on his or her way.
But the ultimate responsibility lies with the railroads, according to Ottensmeyer of KCS. "Where ELDs could have a direct impact on dray carriers is when train service deteriorates in terms of on-time-performance and predictability," Ottensmeyer said in an e-mail. "A driver waiting will consume hours of service, so if a driver had planned to make two dray runs and the second incoming load is delayed on rail, he or she may run out of hours before completing both runs." The same scenario applies at cargo owners' facilities, where loading dock productivity at a warehouse can impact waiting times for drivers, he added.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."