Staying ahead of Mother Nature: interview with John Bosse
Drivers and fleets can't control the weather, but John Bosse of The Weather Company believes that, with a little help, they have the ability to effectively plan for it.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
It's wintertime, and the truck driving is far from easy. For fleets and drivers, January means delays, safety hazards, and general misery across a large swath of the country. With that in mind, The Weather Company, which provides solutions to help businesses—including the world's airlines—minimize the impact of the elements on their operations, established a program tailored to the rig warriors.
In an interview with Mark B. Solomon, DC Velocity's executive editor-news, John Bosse, The Weather Company's offering manager, travel and transportation, talked about the Atlanta-based business's approach to helping truckers cope with the weather, the role of the Internet of Things in its value proposition, and the cost of weather-related accidents on the supply chain.
Q: You were acquired by IBM Corp. in 2015. What did IBM purchase?
A: IBM acquired our business solutions group, our advertising business that is now Watson Advertising, and The Weather Channel's digital properties, which include The Weather Channel app, Weather.com, and Weather Underground. IBM did not acquire the Weather Channel broadcast network.
Q: Truck fleets for years have traditionally relied on National Weather Service (NWS) reports and other sources of secondary research to help plan routes and driver schedules. Can you describe how your service works and how it differs from what's already out there?
A: Our operations dashboard complements the data provided by the National Weather Service with weather information tailored to specific customers. Additionally, we go beyond zone forecasts and can provide temporal and spatial resolution, offering a forecast over more than 2.2 billion locations around the entire globe. This means that drivers can understand what is ahead of them no matter what their destination.
Q: How do you define ROI (return on investment) for your service, and can you provide an example of how a customer has benefited from using it?
A: When we look at ROI for trucking, we consider two key issues: accident prevention and delay mitigation. Combining both issues, here's an example of potential ROI for a 5,000-truck fleet. There were over 430,000 large-truck accidents on U.S. roadways in 2014. That means accidents affected about 4 percent of the estimated 11 million large trucks on the road that year. Using that ratio, an operator of a 5,000-truck fleet can expect 200 accidents a year. By arming drivers with advance knowledge of expected hazardous weather, they are able to plan around it or at least be adequately prepared for it. This knowledge can reduce accidents by at least 5 percent, at an estimated cost of $148,000 per accident. This results in a $1.5 million savings for the company.
When it comes to delay mitigation, it is estimated that the average cost of congestion is $5,664 per truck in the U.S. With advance weather knowledge, coupled with our traffic flow and incident data, we are seeing at least a 5-percent reduction in delays. This converts to $1.3 million in annual savings for the same 5,000-truck fleet.
Q: Can you describe a solution that you would provide to a carrier?
A: A typical solution would involve a combination of services. Drivers and driver business leaders would have access to our "Operations Dashboard" app to track weather and traffic on their routes before they drive. This situational awareness would help them select the right routes, maximize their hours of service, and increase safety. In addition, driving alerts are designed to notify drivers via their in-cab telematics systems when hazardous weather is reported on the road ahead. This lets the driver stay focused on the road but anticipate conditions that will impact both travel speeds and safety by giving them time to change or pull off the road if conditions warrant. Additionally, drivers can combine our weather and traffic data with their own dispatch and asset tracking displays.
Q: What non-IT tips would you give to fleets to help them get ahead of the elements?
A: We like to say that drivers should "brief before you drive." Pilots don't enter a cockpit without a weather briefing, and neither should drivers. With the tools available today, drivers can be better prepared for what lies ahead if they take a minute to review traffic flow, traffic incidents, and the expected road weather conditions before getting in the cab. A quick review during a drop-and-hook or after a fuel stop can improve situational awareness for the next several hours.
Q: What was the catalyst to extend The Weather Company's reach into truck transport?
A: For 40 years, we have worked with global airlines to provide the foundational weather tools used in their daily operations. The extension into surface transport seemed natural, especially with IBM's deep roots serving the industry. The two industries parallel each other more than is visible, and it has everything to do with route optimization, enhanced safety, and maximized performance and efficiency. Ground drivers are the pilots on the ground; they have the same needs when it comes to potential weather conditions. Add into the equation that there are other drivers on the roads causing traffic, and you begin to get a clearer view of why solutions are needed that can help reroute drivers and get them to their destinations with the same safety and efficiency parameters as those given to aviation.
Q: Is the module available to shippers and third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) that work with truckers on behalf of their shipper customers?
A: Yes it is. The service is available across all corners of the industry.
Q: Do you have any data to quantify the cost of bad weather on the trucking ecosystem?
A: Bad weather costs the U.S. trucking industry more than $14 billion annually. According to the Department of Transportation, 22 percent of all U.S. traffic accidents are weather-related. Additionally, we know there were 438,000 large-truck accidents in 2014. So approximately 96,360 of those accidents were likely to be weather-related. If you look at the average cost per trucking accident, which we believe to be $148,000, and the number of total weather-related incidents in a year, it calculates out to more than $14 billion in costs.
Q: Can you describe the role that the Internet of Things (IoT) plays in your weather forecasting model for trucks?
A: IoT is a critical piece of improving the driving experience because data collected from vehicles greatly deepens the volume and quality of real-time observations. This detailed understanding of the road state will move us far beyond the few thousand Road Weather Information System (RWIS) sensors that report today, enabling the monitoring of more roads and improving road-surface forecasts.
Q: Can truckers use these tools for nonbusiness-related purposes?
A: Absolutely. Our dashboard has all of the standard weather features and information that you would see on television or on the Internet. In fact, The Weather Company supplies most of the weather data and graphics used by local broadcasters. This means truckers can plan for short and longer road trips in their "off-time," as well as look for daily and weekly weather conditions.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."