Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
After spending decades with the legendary airline Flying Tigers and then with FedEx Corp., which acquired Tigers nearly 30 years ago, Carl Asmus has forgotten more about air freight than most people ever knew. In addition, as senior vice president of e-commerce for FedEx, Asmus works for a company more closely associated with air shipping than any in history.
So it might have seemed unusual that at a recent conference, Asmus described pitching a prospective customer on FedEx's e-commerce solutions that go across national borders but not even mentioning transport services as part of its value proposition. "All I talked about was making the shopping experience easier for the merchant," Asmus, who also runs FedEx's cross-border e-commerce business, told the gathering. "I didn't talk about transportation."
For Memphis, Tenn.-based FedEx, keeping transport out of the customer dialogue is standard operating procedure for its cross-border strategy. Transportation only happens after someone visits a website, orders an item, and pays for it. For Asmus's unit, the secret sauce is helping a customer in Idaho juggle the many cultural, currency, technological, and commercial variables that come into play once a consumer in Istanbul places an order on its site. A merchant that gets it right on the front end—understanding market demand and implementing a flawless user interface from product availability to payment options—could gain access to markets, and potential repeat business, it could only have dreamed of before. Get it wrong, and a business could watch a market valued today at well over $300 billion and which could be worth three times that in just three years, pass it by. In the latter scenario, the delivery promises of the world's largest and swiftest airfreight network wouldn't amount to a hill of beans.
THE RISE OF CROSS-BORDER E-COMMERCE
The definition of cross-border e-commerce is in the eyes of the beholder. Some make no distinction between cross-border and traditional international e-commerce, given that they both involve movements from one country to another. Consultancy ShipStation, however, frames them as different services. As the company sees it, cross-border e-commerce is exclusively business-to-consumer (B2C), while international can be either B2C or business-to-business (B2B). In a cross-border transaction, the "landed cost"—the combined costs of product, customs duties, taxes, and documentation—is paid up front; in an international e-commerce transaction, customs presents a bill to the shipper or consignee after the fact, according to ShipStation's interpretation.
Today, cross-border e-commerce is, for all practical purposes, practiced in only a handful of countries—the U.S. only for outbound deliveries, Japan, the U.K., Germany, Canada, China, Australia, and South Korea, according to ShipStation; other markets' share of cross-border is too inconsequential to count, the firm said. International e-commerce, by contrast, can be conducted anywhere trade is allowed, ShipStation said.
Cross-border e-commerce is not yet a mature market, which might explain why it's expanding at about 25 percent a year, according to estimates from German air-express giant DHL Express. In conjunction with that expansion, global parcel volume leapt to 65 billion pieces in 2016 from 44 billion in 2014, according to data from information technology specialist Pitney Bowes and research firm eMarketer. Global volumes will rise between 17 and 18 percent a year from 2017 to 2021, according to Pitney Bowes data.
Online ordering between countries is not a passing fad, especially as the Internet allows consumers across the planet to buy stuff that they can't get in their home market or that they can find cheaper elsewhere. About 46 percent of U.K. online shoppers order goods from outside the country, while 21 percent of Germans do, according to estimates from multinational freight forwarder Seko Logistics, based in Itasca, Ill. About 78 percent of all global B2C transactions never touch North America, said Hermes Nextec, an e-commerce unit of the German firm Hermes Group.
Given the long distances and customer demands for speedy deliveries, it would seem to make sense for producers and retailers to build distribution footprints across the globe and fulfill over shorter routes. But that's not the case, said a recent DHL survey of 1,800 e-tailers. Retailers and manufacturers that offer a "premium" shipping service grow 1.6 times as fast as those who don't, according to the survey. That's because expedited shipping allows international e-tailers to compete with their domestic rivals for the "home advantage" of shorter delivery times, DHL said. U.S. brands, which are blessed by having nearly insatiable foreign demand for their products, will bring goods made in low-cost regions into the U.S., where they're then air shipped to their final foreign destinations, said Brian Bourke, Seko's vice president of marketing.
International e-commerce is getting a boost from efforts to raise the value threshold of goods not subject to extensive customs documentation requirements. Last year, the U.S. raised the so-called de minimis threshold to $800 from $200 per shipment, enabling a broader range of products to clear U.S. Customs free of cumbersome paperwork. Eugene Laney, head of international affairs for DHL Express's U.S. operations, said DHL is actively lobbying foreign governments to raise their respective de minimis thresholds because it would provide a substantial tailwind to global commercial activity.
DO YOU NEED TO GET IT RIGHT? OUI!
For all its potential, cross-border e-commerce is a challenge to execute, and the risks of failure are high. Asmus reckoned that only 3 percent out of every 50,000 international website hits result in an item's being placed in a shopping cart. Only 7 percent of that sliver results in an actual sale, he said.
Faced with such long odds, nothing can be left to chance, especially since a consumer in Hungary expects the same seamless experience for a shipment traveling from the U.S. that a customer in Boston would expect for an order fulfilled in Philadelphia. A homogenous pOréal is out of the question. Country-specific websites must be built with content containing time zone, language, currency, and landed-cost details customized for the end consumer. A best-in-class mobile payment system is not a luxury for merchants, but a necessity, experts added.
Compliance is also critical, as each country and region has its own cultural rituals. End customers in Asia are more concerned with product authenticity than price because of the many stories surrounding product counterfeiting in the region, added Laney. By contrast, European consumers focus more on price, he said.
Manufacturers and retailers must also be concerned with the specter of government regulation, particularly because most customs inspectors are unfamiliar with cross-border e-commerce transactions and the parties involved in them. The traditional international air shipment has moved in pallets and containers, and as part of a B2B transaction. Cross-border e-commerce often moves in one- or two-item quantities, and typically between a merchant and a consumer. The B2B channel involves participants known in the customs chain, while the B2C channel includes players who are unfamiliar to inspectors, said Laney. What's more, B2C shipments could be composed of low-value items that might be fraudulent, whereas B2B traffic is usually bona fide given the high shipment value involved, he said.
The complexities of cross-border online trade seem to augur favorably for multinational freight forwarders, who have the networks and the expertise to support a merchant looking to expand into foreign markets. Seko has been at cross-border e-commerce for five to six years, according to Bourke. Five years ago, Seko was not involved in Asian cross-border business; today, Asia is its fastest-growing market, Bourke said.
The German forwarding giant DB Schenker is also moving aggressively into cross-border e-commerce, but it is doing so with partners rather than on its own, said Jochen Thewes, chairman of Schenker's board of management. "Digitization requires companies to be fast to market and to build quick solutions," Thewes said. "This means working with providers to buy services and technology."
Asmus may be sanguine about the role of transportation in making cross-border e-commerce work, but others are not. In an October 2017 survey of 1,200 retailers from eight countries and 12,000 consumers from 11 global markets, Pitney Bowes found that 97 percent of retailers understand the need for fast and reliable end-to-end shipping management and that 52 percent are actively evaluating or researching such services. "Clearly, delivery experiences and speed of fulfillment play a key role in securing and retaining new customers and promoting a long-term relationship more now than ever before," according to the survey.
The global airfreight market has been on fire this year following seven years of malaise. The growth of cross-border e-commerce is a part of that surge, and current trends indicate that it will play an even larger role. Consumers' need for speed will demand the fastest route from A to B, and businesses competing for share of this massive market may find they have no other option than air.
Asked if e-commerce could spur the next golden era for air freight, Bourke replied, "You bet your ass. And you can quote me."
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
The Florida logistics technology startup OneRail has raised $42 million in venture backing to lift the fulfillment software company its next level of growth, the company said today.
The “series C” round was led by Los Angeles-based Aliment Capital, with additional participation from new investors eGateway Capital and Florida Opportunity Fund, as well as current investors Arsenal Growth Equity, Piva Capital, Bullpen Capital, Las Olas Venture Capital, Chicago Ventures, Gaingels and Mana Ventures. According to OneRail, the funding comes amidst a challenging funding environment where venture capital funding in the logistics sector has seen a 90% decline over the past two years.
The latest infusion follows the firm’s $33 million Series B round in 2022, and its move earlier in 2024 to acquire the Vancouver, Canada-based company Orderbot, a provider of enterprise inventory and distributed order management (DOM) software.
Orlando-based OneRail says its omnichannel fulfillment solution pairs its OmniPoint cloud software with a logistics as a service platform and a real-time, connected network of 12 million drivers. The firm says that its OmniPointsoftware automates fulfillment orchestration and last mile logistics, intelligently selecting the right place to fulfill inventory from, the right shipping mode, and the right carrier to optimize every order.
“This new funding round enables us to deepen our decision logic upstream in the order process to help solve some of the acute challenges facing retailers and wholesalers, such as order sourcing logic defaulting to closest store to customer to fulfill inventory from, which leads to split orders, out-of-stocks, or worse, cancelled orders,” OneRail Founder and CEO Bill Catania said in a release. “OneRail has revolutionized that process with a dynamic fulfillment solution that quickly finds available inventory in full, from an array of stores or warehouses within a localized radius of the customer, to meet the delivery promise, which ultimately transforms the end-customer experience.”
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.