As YRC's Welch calls it a day, the company's future becomes someone else's problem
Welch brought a sick patient back to life. His successor, YRC Freight's Hawkins, will have his hands full navigating a potential reckoning that lies ahead.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
The term "hot mess," frequently used by millennials to describe "something in a state of extreme disorder or disarray," according to Merriam-Webster, has never been associated with transportation companies. But that's essentially what James L. Welch inherited when he became CEO of YRC Worldwide Inc. in July 2011.
The Overland Park, Kan.-based less than truckload (LTL) carrier was rescued from the boneyard at the end of 2009 and early 2010 by the enormous financial sacrifices of its unionized workforce and the almost-surreal forbearance of its lenders. When Welch took over 18 months later, however, YRC was still on life support. It was deeply in debt, weighed down by underperforming businesses, and trying to survive in an environment of weak LTL demand, with rivals deliberately underpricing their freight to drive the company out of business. Welch was also burdened with decisions made by prior CEO William D. Zollars to acquire rivals Roadway Express in 2003 and US Freightways in 2005, moves that led to dramatic declines in service and would come to virtually drown YRC in an ocean of red ink during a period in the wake of the Great Recession when the company's tonnage collapsed.
Nearly six and a half years later, YRC still stands, albeit not without trials and errors; more pain inflicted on its unionized workers, represented by the Teamsters union; and questions about its future—especially what happens over the next five years. But Welch won't be around to steer it. The company announced late yesterday that Welch, 62, will retire July 31. Darren D. Hawkins, currently president of YRC Freight, YRC's long-haul unit, will become the parent's president and COO, a newly created and transitional post, on Jan. 1. T.J. O'Connor, president of YRC's Reddaway western regional LTL division, will become president of YRC Freight when the year starts. Bob Stone, Reddaway's vice president of operations, will take O'Connor's current job on that date. YRC's board plans to name Hawkins its CEO at its July meeting.
Hawkins, 47, is well regarded and seen as the best choice to fill what is viewed by many as the most challenging position in LTL. He will need all his acumen and interpersonal skills to manage what lies ahead. YRC today faces blowback from two big companies, long-time customers who have complained that they are being asked to accept 5- to 6-percent annualized contract rate increases even though they stood by YRC during the lean times with steady tonnage streams at rate escalations about half of that, according to an industry source.
At the same time, the company is coming off a sloppy third quarter, which warranted a mid-October negative pre-announcement blaming the results on the combined impacts of hurricanes Harvey and Irma on its network operations, even though other LTL carriers didn't seem too affected by the storms. (The narrative prompted David G. Ross, who covers YRC for investment firm Stifel, to coin, in a research note, the phrase, "Here comes the story of the hurricane, the storm YRC came to blame.") The quarter also brought surprising news of poor performance from YRC's New Penn Motor Express regional unit, for decades considered the gold standard of LTL efficiency and profitability. The weakness, which a source said was attributed to IT issues, led to the resignation of its president.
Storms and a couple of angry customers aside, YRC, like other LTL carriers, is riding the tailwinds of an improving economy; solid industrial and construction demand, which has dimmed bad memories of the 2014-16 industrial recession; and better overall pricing trends. All of those favorable trends could last through 2018. For Hawkins and the company that will soon be his to run, the challenges—barring another recession by decade's end—will arise sometime in 2018 or early 2019. That's when YRC will begin contract talks with the Teamsters union—which today represents about 26,000 YRC employees—to replace the current compact, which expires in March 2019.
There is much baggage here. To save the company from potential ruin in 2009, the union's rank and file agreed to a debt-for-equity swap that diluted their collective equity holdings to near zero. The workers also agreed at the time to a massive chop in pension benefits. Then, in 2014, needing to restructure $1.4 billion in debt and not able to get any more latitude from the banks without additional labor concessions, Welch and management went back to the union seeking a five-year contract extension that included further givebacks.
A dangerous game of chicken ensued, with the union rejecting YRC's initial contract proposal, prompting Welch and underlings to warn there was no path forward for the company other than bankruptcy if the rank and file didn't come to terms. The members subsequently voted to ratify the extension, but the episode left a trail of bitterness that exists to this day, according to a union source. The Teamsters, which declined comment on Welch's departure, are unlikely to be called on for even more concessions during the next round of talks, but it's doubtful the union will be content with a continuation of the status quo, according to an industry source.
YRC caught a break when its lenders agreed to extend the maturity date for a $641.7 million term loan to July 26, 2022, from 2019, a move that Ross of Stifel said gives the company more breathing room and better negotiating leverage with the Teamsters. Lurking in the background are about $2 billion in unfunded pension liabilities, which, as with most such obligations, is classified as an off-balance-sheet expense. At this time, YRC's third-quarter balance-sheet debt stands at $941.7 million, the lowest it's been since before the Great Recession. The coverage ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization over the past four quarters sits at 3.52 to 1, and terms of YRC's loan agreement require the company to significantly narrow the ratio over the next five years.
Meeting those requirements while satisfying liquidity needs would require profitability improvements. YRC, in its quarterly government filing last month, said it could achieve those improvements by streamlining its support structure; continuing to make strides in pricing, productivity, and efficiency; and increasing its volumes. At the same time, it noted that some of the items on that list were outside its control.
From July on, all of these issues will be on Hawkins' plate, not Welch's. No one expected Welch to stay forever. He was brought in to sustain the 93-year-old concern, and if appearances tell the tale, he has succeeded. "Welch did a great job with what he had to work with," said Charles W. Clowdis Jr., a long-time industry executive and consultant. "He kept the company afloat, and for that he should be rewarded."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.