Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Amazon.com Inc. is testing a program to offer two-day nationwide deliveries for all shippers, including those who aren't Amazon customers, a project that could spawn the largest U.S. transportation network buildout in decades and cap Amazon's multiyear effort to create an in-house operation to meet surging demand for its products and services.
The program is being piloted in Los Angeles and in nearby Orange County, Calif., both markets with enormous populations and, by extension, strong shipment density, according to a source who has held high-level jobs at Amazon and today works with businesses that cumulatively spend hundreds of millions of dollars with the Seattle-based e-tailer. Information on the proposed buildout was provided by a client who is involved in the pilot program, according to the source, who asked for anonymity.
Amazon "wants to pick up all of (a customer's) orders regardless of what they are and where they're going," the source said.
There is no known time frame for completing the pilot, nor is it known when an expansion might occur should Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos give the go-ahead, the source said. Amazon did not provide a comment by press time.
The program has several objectives, according to the source: ensuring that Amazon's shipping and fulfillment operations consistently meet customer delivery commitments; efficiently filling what is expected to be an explosion of Amazon's capacity in coming years; and, perhaps most significantly, convincing businesses that currently don't do so to sell on Amazon's website and use its fulfillment and delivery services, known as Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA). Through the first nine months of 2017, Amazon's "net service sales," which is mostly composed of FBA revenue, hit more than $40 billion, up from $28 billion in the same period in 2016. Amazon reported more than $117 billion in net sales during that period, $77 billion of which came from sales of merchandise on the company's website as well as related products.
LEVERAGING LOGISTICS ASSETS
Besides offering shipping services to all customers, Amazon would accept shipments of all sizes, going beyond the parcel deliveries that have dominated e-commerce for nearly 25 years. The company also plans to execute all deliveries within the two-day delivery commitment under its very popular Amazon Prime program, where customers pay a $99 annual fee for unlimited two-day deliveries of most products sold on Amazon's website.
The Prime service, which as of October had an estimated 90 million members, has become core to Amazon's value proposition. One key reason is that, according to industry estimates, Prime customers order nearly twice as much per year as those who do not subscribe to the service.
The pilot is leveraging Amazon's domestic transport and logistics assets; on the facilities side, that includes fulfillment centers, inbound and outbound sortation centers, delivery stations, a 2-million-square-foot air cargo hub under construction in Cincinnati that's expected to open in late 2018, and local hubs to support its Prime Now service, which offers free two-hour deliveries to Prime members. Amazon has a combined total of 262 such facilities in the United States, according to figures published last month by the consulting firm MWPVL International.
Amazon owns thousands of 53-foot trailers that are designed for medium- to long-haul transportation; owns or leases hundreds of local-delivery vehicles; and has 40 freighter aircraft for its Prime Air service—all of which could translate into millions of next-day deliveries, depending on how and where Amazon sources its freight. The company is also recruiting owner-operator truck drivers, who would bring thousands of power units to the table and provide over-the-road and "last-mile" local deliveries.
The company has made no secret of its desire to bring much of its transport and distribution activity in-house. For years, its shipping costs have exceeded shipping revenues—the latter generated through its fulfillment service—and observers suspect that gap has widened as shipment volumes continued to grow.
CARRIER MIX MAY CHANGE
According to data from transportation analysts SJ Consulting, about 90 percent of Amazon's U.S. shipments move via UPS Inc., the U.S. Postal Service, FedEx Corp., and to a lesser degree, DHL Express, though Amazon has been using DHL's hub in Cincinnati to house its air operations while its own hub is being built. The remaining deliveries are handled by regional carriers, local delivery companies, and independent truck drivers, according to SJ's estimates.
Over the next few years, those smaller operators' share of Amazon's total volume will rise to about 40 percent, according to SJ Consulting's projections. But due to projected 20 percent annualized growth in Amazon's volumes for the foreseeable future, the major parcel and postal carriers will still see as much volume as they do today, according to Satish Jindel, the consulting firm's founder and president.
However, as envisioned under the pilot, Amazon would not use the big carriers as frequently as it does now, the source said, adding that the e-tailer would rely on outside providers only on "high-confidence" routes where it is virtually certain the two-day delivery commitment can be consistently met. Otherwise, Amazon would inject its own capacity, the source said.
The source said Amazon's worries about service reliability are well founded. "They are not ahead of the curve, and they know it. Products are getting delivered late." Last Tuesday, UPS disclosed that an undetermined number of shipments ordered during "Cyber Week," the online ordering frenzy that occurs the week after Thanksgiving, would be delayed due to an unprecedented volume of orders. There is little doubt that some of the affected shipments were ordered through or fulfilled by Amazon.
By controlling its transport network, Amazon could efficiently position assets so fully loaded trailers move between sorting centers and hubs over the shortest possible distances, thus maintaining its delivery commitments while shaving transport costs, the source said. Amazon also has a seemingly unlimited supply of capital from patient investors that could be deployed for needed investments.
However, developing a nationwide one- or two-day delivery network, especially with assets it doesn't own, will be a daunting challenge even for a company of Amazon's operational prowess. The source said Amazon would need to rapidly increase the number of U.S. sortation centers it has. According to MWPVL, there currently are 46 such facilities. Amazon may also face challenges in serving businesses with their own warehouses that are outside of its fulfillment ecosystem, and it may encounter turbulence flexing its business to accommodate seasonal changes in demand. Amazon may also struggle, as so many companies currently are, to recruit enough qualified drivers to dramatically scale up the long-haul part of its business. "Amazon is not immune from any of the challenges facing companies in the transport area," the source said.
POTENTIAL IMPACT ON THIRD PARTIES
In some ways, the transport program is following a pattern similar to another pilot, called Seller Flex, that launched on the West Coast earlier this year. Under Seller Flex, Amazon picks up goods from companies that sell on its website but don't use its fulfillment services and delivers them to the end customer. That program, which is aimed in part at taking pressure off of Amazon's fulfillment system, may be rolled out nationwide next year.
Seller Flex could deal a harsh blow to third-party warehouse operators if Amazon convinces their customers to join the FBA network. The transport program could impact Amazon's large carrier partners in a similar way, particularly if Amazon takes a share of business in areas it could not or would not handle before. According to the source, third-party carriers, while still being involved in the program, would receive less money from Amazon because the e-tailer would be performing—at lower prices—some services that the carriers had been handling. Combined with Amazon's buying power, the e-tailer would gain compelling leverage with the incumbent carriers in rate negotiations, the source said. The big carriers could walk away, but in so doing would be relinquishing large volumes of business, the source said.
As it has done in the past with other initiatives, Amazon will quietly work out the transport program's kinks in the demanding Los Angeles-Orange County markets before expanding it to other regions, the source said. Given the company's pattern of rapidly scaling up its programs once Bezos pushes the button, the source said, it would not be surprising if the country woke up one day in the not-too-distant future to find that "the service is in 20 markets."
Editor's note: An earlier version of this story erroneously identified the time span for Amazon's sales figures. DC Velocity regrets the error.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.