Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Trust and transparency are words not normally associated with truckload pricing. Contracts between shippers, brokers, or third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) and carriers in the $700 billion-a-year business are difficult to enforce and routinely disregarded. Shippers often don't honor volume commitments and have been known to kick a carrier to the curb if they can get a lower price elsewhere. Carriers can be just as fair-weather, turning their wheels in another direction if more profitable loads come along, especially during weak pricing cycles. Shippers and their brokers are then forced to search carrier routing guides for alternative capacity. Failing that, they turn to the volatile non-contract, or spot, market, hoping to find trucks at prices they can live with.
Enter Craig Fuller, armed with terabytes of pricing data and an abiding faith in Adam Smith's "invisible hand" of the free market. By forming a company called TransRisk to trade futures contracts for spot truckload pricing, Fuller, part of the third generation of the Chattanooga, Tenn., family that founded truckload giant U.S. Xpress Enterprises Inc., hopes to establish a mechanism allowing participants to hedge the direction of spot rates and manage price risk. By doing so, they can protect their margins against sharp up and down moves in spot rates and the market's reactions to them, he said. Fuller plans to go live with the platform during mid- to late-2018.
The objective, Fuller said, is to inject honest dealing into what he called a "liar's poker" atmosphere, where bidding, bluffing, and deception are intertwined in a zero-sum game where one side gains at the expense of the other. TransRisk will let the marketplace determine prices, Fuller said. By creating an open, tradable market with transparent price discovery, shippers, brokers, and carriers "could be much more honest about their demand and capacity," he said in an interview. This will spawn better decision-making on all sides, he added.
The service was announced Oct. 27 in partnership with DAT Solutions LLC, a load-board provider that will provide pricing data across several high-density markets to form the basis for buy-and-sell decisions, and Nodal Exchange LLC, a derivatives exchange that clears trades and settles accounts in the electric power and natural gas industries.
HOW IT WORKS
The model works like this: Say a shipper has a contract rate of $1.25 cents a mile, but it needs additional capacity and is concerned spot rates to secure more tractor-trailers could climb to $1.50 a mile over the next six months. The shipper buys a futures contract to hedge its position. Should spot rates subsequently trade at the higher price, the shipper sells out at a profit and neutralizes its margin shrinkage due to the upward price spike.
Conversely, a carrier contracted to haul at $1.50 per mile but concerned spot rates could decline six months out could sell futures to lock in the higher price and reduce its downside risk. Of course, the shipper and carrier could lose if they bet wrong.
TransRisk makes its money on commissions collected from each transaction. Contracts will have durations of no more than a year. TransRisk will not book loads or manage trucks, and no physical delivery of a product will take place—a departure from other futures markets where a contract's holder takes delivery of the underlying commodity should the contract expire.
The platform will initially support just the dry van segment, the most commonly used trailer type. However, Fuller said he plans to expand the portfolio at some point to incorporate flatbed, refrigerated, and dry bulk truck transport. Cloud-based technology will underpin the trading activity, meaning participants need not invest in IT (information technology) capabilities, he added.
Trading in transport futures is not a new concept. In 2001, the International Maritime Exchange, an Oslo, Norway-based exchange for trading forward freight agreements, began trading tanker freight futures contracts. The next year, the exchange began trading dry cargo futures. Fuller said the market for spot truckload futures is potentially much larger than for maritime futures.
ALL IN THE TIMING
Fuller will launch his model amid an increasingly volatile climate for spot rates. A growing shortage of commercial truck drivers, the Dec. 18 deadline for electronic logging device (ELD) compliance, and a firming tone to overall freight demand will result in a considerable tightening in truckload capacity in 2018 and perhaps beyond, according to various experts. In an interview, Fuller said that a risk management tool like TransRisk couldn't come along at a more opportune time.
Spot rates this year have already put the hurt on shippers and brokers. The second quarter saw a sharp break between rising spot rates and flattish contract prices that squeezed brokers' margins. It didn't get easier for users in the third quarter as spot rates hit multiyear highs. Large blocks of capacity moved south to support the recovery efforts after hurricanes Harvey and Irma, and an improving U.S. economy and strong harvests in several regions left shippers with a lot of loads but not enough trucks. Truckload demand hit seven-year highs in September, with van demand seeing unusual strength, according to DAT data.
Fuller said the biggest risk to the model's success is that orders would be so large that counterparties—those on the other side of the trade—wouldn't have the liquidity to match them. Fuller estimates his market will require $50 million in monthly volume in order to function in an orderly fashion. The need for significant capital means the platform will be dominated by companies with big loads and capacity at stake, according to Fuller. Smaller players like owner-operators and micro fleets need not apply because the cost wouldn't outweigh the benefits, he said.
TransRisk's fee is equal to 0.5 percent of the size of the contract, which Fuller contends is a small price for large players to pay for the chance to limit their exposure to spot market turbulence. Fuller said the platform works for participants expecting wide up or down movements in spot rates, not marginal ones. "It's not that people think prices are going up or not, it's the degree to which they do so that they are trying to [hedge against]," he said.
One broker who thinks TransRisk will attract and retain ample capital is Douglas Waggoner, chief executive officer of Chicago-based Echo Global Logistics Inc., one of the country's largest brokers. Speaking in October at an industry conference in Chicago, Waggoner called the concept a "a valid approach" to delivering adequate price discovery and said TransRisk should find "plenty of speculators who will provide liquidity."
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.