Georgia's Mid-American Arc project is a big bet on a profound shift in the country's goods-moving network. But some believe it may have overplayed its hand.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
In September 2016, the Georgia Ports Authority (GPA), the operator of the containerport of Savannah and the break-bulk and roll-on/roll-off port of Brunswick, announced it would construct an arc-like rail network stretching across the country's midsection. By building 97,000 feet of track linking the two rail yards at its Garden City container terminal, GPA would offer the two railroads that serve Savannah—Norfolk Southern Corp. (NS) and CSX Corp.—sufficient scale to assemble 10,000-foot unit trains to routinely run from Savannah's docks to markets as far west as St. Louis.
Nearly a year later to the day, the largest containership ever to call on the East Coast, the 14,000-TEU (20-foot equivalent unit) CMA CGM Theodore Roosevelt, docked at Savannah after sailing through the widened and deepened locks of the Panama Canal, which accommodates vessels nearly three times the TEU capacity of the canal's original design. (See photo above.)
The two events are interconnected. The $128 million "Mid-American Arc" project, expected to be fully operational by 2020 with the first phase set for completion in 2019, is GPA's attempt to get ahead of what some believe is a secular shift in U.S. goods movement. As larger containerships hit the water and the expanded canal handles more cargo bound for destinations east of the Mississippi, the reasoning goes, East Coast ports can expect to see steady increases in volumes. As a result, the landside infrastructure will face greater productivity pressure as more boxes hit the docks; GPA expects Garden City to annually handle 1 million rail lifts (each container moving on or off a railcar constitutes one lift) by the time the Arc is completed. Meanwhile, there will be challenges making timely deliveries off the ports by truck amid increased road congestion and a growing shortage of qualified commercial truck drivers. Overarching all of this is the task of providing efficient and timely freight movement to a U.S. population inexorably headed toward the 400 million mark.
The confluence of these trends will force massive change on the transport ecosystem, says Walter Kemmsies, head of the North American ports practice at Chicago-based real estate and logistics services giant JLL Inc. The freight network will morph into what will resemble a power grid composed of gateway and inland ports, railroads, and intermodal truckers, all tied together by advanced IT (information technology) systems that maritime users today can't begin to fathom, Kemmsies says. The ports, he adds, will serve as the "generating plants."
The Arc represents an opportunity for GPA to attract more Asian import business transiting the canal and to capture traffic that historically flows to Chicago, St. Louis, and other Midwest points from the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, which remains the nation's busiest port complex but which is plagued by persistent congestion and delays. As GPA Executive Director Griff Lynch sees it, the canal is the catalyst for much that is yet to come.
"Five or 10 years ago, a project like the Arc would not have had legs" because Savannah then didn't have the volumes to justify the need, Lynch said in a recent interview.
Lynch says the Arc is less about capturing market share from East and West Coast ports than it is about minimizing supply chain friction amid growing freight volumes nationwide. "We want to insert ourselves into the supply chain—not as a chokepoint but as an accelerant," he said.
WEST COAST'S ENDURING STRENGTH
GPA is not the only port authority inserting itself into the 21st century transport mosaic. This summer, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey completed a $1.6 billion project to raise the Bayonne Bridge—which spans the two states—to 215 feet from 151 feet; the rise provides clearance for ships with 18,000-TEU capacities, doubling the maximum vessel size that could be handled before. The Virginia Ports Authority, which runs the Port of Norfolk among other facilities, has been involved for seven years with Norfolk-based NS's "Heartland Corridor" project that expedites double-stack intermodal traffic moving between Norfolk, Chicago, and Columbus, Ohio. In September, the port announced that CSX would link Norfolk and Pittsburgh in what would be the last step in the Jacksonville, Fla.-based railroad's decade-old "National Gateway" double-stack initiative.
Out west, Omaha, Neb.-based Union Pacific Corp. and Fort Worth, Texas-based BNSF Railway operate double-stack services on double-tracked infrastructure from the Southern California ports into the Midwest. Today, 16 unit trains, some two miles in length, run daily from Los Angeles to Long Beach and from there to Dallas, St. Louis, and Chicago.
Joshua Brogan, vice president at consultancy A.T. Kearney & Co., says the Los Angeles-Long Beach complex remains the most cost-effective way to move Asian imports into the U.S. heartland. Freight from Shanghai to Chicago transiting the West Coast arrives at its final stop in as little as 15 days, and 21 days at the very outset if there is significant congestion at the U.S. gateway, Brogan reckons. By contrast, freight on the same vessel transiting the Panama Canal, calling on Savannah, and trans-loaded onto rail for movement to Chicago takes 24 days to arrive, he says. The pricing differential between the two routes isn't significant enough to move the needle, he says.
Brogan says that despite the original canal's smallish size (5,500-TEU capacity), there wasn't much pent-up demand to shift business from the West to the East Coast even before the expansion. Other than a two-month dip in early 2017 for West Coast loaded box traffic, there hasn't been a meaningful decline out west since the expanded canal opened for business in June 2016, according to Kearney data gathered from the ports. This lends credence to the belief that there wasn't any latent demand for the expanded canal to satisfy, he says.
Comparisons between Savannah and the Los Angeles/Long Beach complex rarely arise in discussions with shippers and beneficial cargo owners (BCOs), Brogan says. "It's just not a major issue for them," he says.
ODDS-ON FAVORITE
If one believes, however, that competition among East Coast ports for burgeoning "neo-Panamax" traffic will be fierce, then Savannah holds a strong hand, experts say. Its 1,200-acre Garden City terminal is considered a model for landside operations, and it still has room to expand. All rail traffic exiting Savannah leaves from its docks. Even at Los Angeles and Long Beach, less than one-third of box traffic departs via on-dock rail, according to Jon Slangerup, former executive director of the Port of Long Beach and now executive chairman and chief executive officer of American Global Logistics, an Atlanta-based third-party logistics services and technology provider. The balance is still trucked to urban, near-dock truck-to-rail transload facilities, he says.
Slangerup says the Port of New York and New Jersey has issues in strengthening its IT systems connecting vessels, ports, rails, and trucks. It is also hobbled by the congestion that accompanies being in the country's most densely populated market. Savannah has the technology, it has the space, and it has a multimodal powerhouse just 250 miles to the west in Atlanta, which boasts the world's busiest airport for passenger volumes and is a major aircargo gateway.
While Virginia has components such as multimodal connectivity and inland port operations to optimize its network and keep pace with trade growth, it "doesn't have the infrastructure or push-pull effect of Atlanta to compete on the scale of Savannah," Slangerup says. The Port of Charleston, S.C., meanwhile, needs to get its "arms around the required capital" to position itself as a competitor to Savannah, he added.
Savannah also has another factor in its favor: its ownership. As one of four port-owned and -operated facilities—the others being Charleston, Norfolk, and Houston—it has the full support of the state, as well as access to state funding. By contrast, Los Angeles/Long Beach and New York/New Jersey, being so-called landlord ports, have to deal with often-conflicting objectives of terminal operators as well as multiple political masters.
At Savannah, the dearth of red tape means faster decisions and less time wading through the bureaucratic muck, says Kemmsies of JLL. The GPA's operational structure, he says, means it "can fix things before they're broken."
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.