After two-plus decades managing military logistics, Chris Andrews successfully parlayed the skills he honed in the Army into a management job in the private sector. Now, he's working to help other vets do the same.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
Three years ago, Lieutenant Colonel Chris Andrews retired from the Army after serving his country for 26 years. Although he has retired from the military, Andrews has hardly "retired from life," as he puts it. He's now pursuing a second career serving as distribution and logistics manager at the Mesquite, Texas, distribution center run by Benjamin Moore Paints.
Andrews, who spent much of his time in the Army working in military logistics, says the Army prepared him well for his current situation. Among other skills, it taught him leadership, dedication, teamwork, and the nuts and bolts of getting materials from one place to another on time and in good condition.
Now, Andrews is working to help other veterans make a similar leap. At the Warehousing Education and Research Council's annual conference earlier this year, he participated in panel on the "Vets To WERC" program, an initiative aimed at connecting military veterans with employers needing their skills (and of which DC Velocity is a founding partner). As we celebrate Veterans Day in November, DC Velocity Chief Editor David Maloney talked with Andrews about his transition to the civilian work force, the differences between military and private-sector logistics, and his advice for other veterans seeking careers in private industry.
Q: First, can you briefly describe what you did in the military and how that led to your involvement in the supply chain?
A: I first enlisted in the military what seems like eons ago. After three years, I went to college and got my commission as a second lieutenant in the Army cavalry, which was combat arms [troops that participate in direct tactical ground combat]. That was very fulfilling because I was on the best team in the world, and it was something that I could really relate to. At that time, the Army was taking combat arms officers and moving them over into logistics because it was looking for people who understood what the combat arms units needed to fulfill their missions. So I decided to put in for a branch transfer to the Transportation Corps. The transfer was approved, and I went to Fort Eustis, Va., to go through the Transportation Officers Advanced Course.
Q: What did that teach you?
A: I learned a lot about the intricacies of managing transportation and supply chain distribution from a tactical kind of frontline level. You learn how to take assets and work out a plan to be able to support any mission, any disaster, anything that the Army or the military in general does in support of the nation. You could not fail because there were too many lives on the line.
Q: Where else have you been deployed?
A: After I graduated from the officers advanced course, I went to Fort Carson, Colo., to serve as the commander of the 4th Infantry Division's Transportation Company, which was responsible for supporting over 18,000 soldiers in all types of missions. That is really where I cut my teeth—that's where I learned how things worked and that teamwork is absolutely essential to mission success. During Desert Shield and Desert Storm, I was called upon to get all of the assets together to be shipped from Fort Carson to Saudi Arabia. Over 5,000 vehicles had to get moved out in a very short period. That was definitely a standout event in my life because we really accomplished something special. I was so proud of the team that I had.
Q: You also worked with civilians later in your military career. Can you tell us about that?
A: Yes, I had a chance to participate in the Army's "Training With Industry" program back in the '90s, in which selected officers were given a chance to go work with a civilian company for a period of time. In my case, I went to Sea-Land Corp., which was at the time an innovator and a world leader in container shipping. I moved to Long Beach, Calif., to work in the terminals there and learn how you load a ship and how you deal with unions. Then, in December 1994, I went to Dallas to work in the company's administrative offices.
Q: You also have experience with combat deployments.
A: Yes, after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, I served with the security assistant teams that were supporting units in the Middle East. We handled the whole supply chain—I mean, everything from maintenance to transportation, ordnance, and contract management. I learned a lot. We then deployed to Iraq, which was another of those combat zones where you are in a very difficult situation. Combat is one of those things that really test your mettle as a military person. That was a time of great learning, of great satisfaction, and I am very proud of what we were able to accomplish in Iraq. That experience was a kind of validation that everything I had learned up to that point was correct, and it cemented the foundation for everything I did afterward, including here at Benjamin Moore.
Q: What led to your transition out of the military and into the private sector?
A: After my deployment to Afghanistan in 2013, I realized that my time in the military was coming to an end. I think I had done just about everything I wanted to as an officer, and I wanted to retire—but retire from the military, not retire from life. So I submitted my paperwork, retired in July 2014, and moved to Plano, Texas.
Q: How did the opportunity with Benjamin Moore come up?
A: I had been in Plano about two weeks when I got a phone call from a headhunter at Everest Group who had seen my résumé online. He was calling to see if I might be interested in talking with Benjamin Moore about a distribution logistics manager position in Mesquite, Texas.
My interview with Benjamin Moore turned out to be one of those interviews that were absolutely perfect. I had been on the best team in the world—a dynamic team, one that absolutely hit on all cylinders and where everyone just worked so well together. After being on one great team, I wanted to be part of another, and when I interviewed, it became clear that this was another dynamic team. It was evolving. It was pushing the outer limits of doing things logistically that the company had not done before.
Q: Can you give me some examples?
A: Well, the plan was to expand our network—our retailers—and invest in better equipment and technology. There was a clear vision of where we wanted to go, and that was to be the premium paint company in the U.S. To do that, you had to have the best logistics processes in place or be working toward that.
Q: What skills and experiences helped you make the transition from the military to the business world?
A: I think dealing with both military and civilians throughout my time was instrumental. It really allowed me to understand that while the two groups are working toward the same goal, they tend to go about it a little differently. So, you have to allow people to take those gifts that they have and let them flourish. I was able to hone my skills with respect to providing guidance and providing oversight without impeding their progress or hurting their morale.
Q: What differences have you found between military logistics and logistics in the private sector?
A: When you look at it from a logistical standpoint, there is not much difference. I almost look at the retailers that we support as the frontline. They are dealing with the public and selling paint and paint products, so we have to do everything in our power to ensure that they have all those assets, all those products, so that they can pay their bills and pay their employees and support the public.
Q: How did you find the overall transition to civilian life? Was it a difficult adjustment?
A: When I submitted my paperwork to retire in 2013, I had roughly eight months in which to go through the transition that the Army offers. I was mentally prepared for it. Now, having said that, I will tell you that there are certain aspects of the transition that are tough to get used to. One is staying in place when you've been used to moving about every three years. You've got to establish some roots. I am fortunate that I have a job that I am very happy with, but that is not the case with some people who are transitioning from the military.
Q: Can you elaborate on that?
A: There are a lot of vets out there who are still unemployed. So, that transition is ongoing with them in a very personal way. This is where we've got to get employers matched up with vets who want jobs. The thing is, you're not going to find a work force out there that is more committed, more loyal, and that has this same level of real-world expertise. It is ready. They just need a chance to be able to go out and become part of another dynamic team.
Q: You spoke at a panel on the Vets To WERC program (an initiative that seeks to match veterans with supply chain job opportunities) at this year's WERC conference. How did you become a part of that?
A: My name came up in conversations with people at Benjamin Moore. We started talking, and they asked me to be on the panel and talk about my experiences. I just think it is an awesome program.
Q: To close, what advice would you offer a veteran who is seeking a career in the private sector?
A: I would say to the vets that are out there that you need to showcase who you are. Showcase what you can bring to a company. Use all those skills that you learned in the military. Don't ever stop trying. There are people out there that want to hire you.
I would say the same thing to employers. You have a work force out there that is absolutely ready to go. And somewhere, you have got to meet.
I am passionate about this issue because there are so many veterans who are still unemployed despite the tight job market. What baffles me is that there's this group of people from the vets side and a group of employers looking for qualified people. Somehow, they just can't seem to get together. So we have to be able to bridge that gap.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."