After two-plus decades managing military logistics, Chris Andrews successfully parlayed the skills he honed in the Army into a management job in the private sector. Now, he's working to help other vets do the same.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
Three years ago, Lieutenant Colonel Chris Andrews retired from the Army after serving his country for 26 years. Although he has retired from the military, Andrews has hardly "retired from life," as he puts it. He's now pursuing a second career serving as distribution and logistics manager at the Mesquite, Texas, distribution center run by Benjamin Moore Paints.
Andrews, who spent much of his time in the Army working in military logistics, says the Army prepared him well for his current situation. Among other skills, it taught him leadership, dedication, teamwork, and the nuts and bolts of getting materials from one place to another on time and in good condition.
Now, Andrews is working to help other veterans make a similar leap. At the Warehousing Education and Research Council's annual conference earlier this year, he participated in panel on the "Vets To WERC" program, an initiative aimed at connecting military veterans with employers needing their skills (and of which DC Velocity is a founding partner). As we celebrate Veterans Day in November, DC Velocity Chief Editor David Maloney talked with Andrews about his transition to the civilian work force, the differences between military and private-sector logistics, and his advice for other veterans seeking careers in private industry.
Q: First, can you briefly describe what you did in the military and how that led to your involvement in the supply chain?
A: I first enlisted in the military what seems like eons ago. After three years, I went to college and got my commission as a second lieutenant in the Army cavalry, which was combat arms [troops that participate in direct tactical ground combat]. That was very fulfilling because I was on the best team in the world, and it was something that I could really relate to. At that time, the Army was taking combat arms officers and moving them over into logistics because it was looking for people who understood what the combat arms units needed to fulfill their missions. So I decided to put in for a branch transfer to the Transportation Corps. The transfer was approved, and I went to Fort Eustis, Va., to go through the Transportation Officers Advanced Course.
Q: What did that teach you?
A: I learned a lot about the intricacies of managing transportation and supply chain distribution from a tactical kind of frontline level. You learn how to take assets and work out a plan to be able to support any mission, any disaster, anything that the Army or the military in general does in support of the nation. You could not fail because there were too many lives on the line.
Q: Where else have you been deployed?
A: After I graduated from the officers advanced course, I went to Fort Carson, Colo., to serve as the commander of the 4th Infantry Division's Transportation Company, which was responsible for supporting over 18,000 soldiers in all types of missions. That is really where I cut my teeth—that's where I learned how things worked and that teamwork is absolutely essential to mission success. During Desert Shield and Desert Storm, I was called upon to get all of the assets together to be shipped from Fort Carson to Saudi Arabia. Over 5,000 vehicles had to get moved out in a very short period. That was definitely a standout event in my life because we really accomplished something special. I was so proud of the team that I had.
Q: You also worked with civilians later in your military career. Can you tell us about that?
A: Yes, I had a chance to participate in the Army's "Training With Industry" program back in the '90s, in which selected officers were given a chance to go work with a civilian company for a period of time. In my case, I went to Sea-Land Corp., which was at the time an innovator and a world leader in container shipping. I moved to Long Beach, Calif., to work in the terminals there and learn how you load a ship and how you deal with unions. Then, in December 1994, I went to Dallas to work in the company's administrative offices.
Q: You also have experience with combat deployments.
A: Yes, after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, I served with the security assistant teams that were supporting units in the Middle East. We handled the whole supply chain—I mean, everything from maintenance to transportation, ordnance, and contract management. I learned a lot. We then deployed to Iraq, which was another of those combat zones where you are in a very difficult situation. Combat is one of those things that really test your mettle as a military person. That was a time of great learning, of great satisfaction, and I am very proud of what we were able to accomplish in Iraq. That experience was a kind of validation that everything I had learned up to that point was correct, and it cemented the foundation for everything I did afterward, including here at Benjamin Moore.
Q: What led to your transition out of the military and into the private sector?
A: After my deployment to Afghanistan in 2013, I realized that my time in the military was coming to an end. I think I had done just about everything I wanted to as an officer, and I wanted to retire—but retire from the military, not retire from life. So I submitted my paperwork, retired in July 2014, and moved to Plano, Texas.
Q: How did the opportunity with Benjamin Moore come up?
A: I had been in Plano about two weeks when I got a phone call from a headhunter at Everest Group who had seen my résumé online. He was calling to see if I might be interested in talking with Benjamin Moore about a distribution logistics manager position in Mesquite, Texas.
My interview with Benjamin Moore turned out to be one of those interviews that were absolutely perfect. I had been on the best team in the world—a dynamic team, one that absolutely hit on all cylinders and where everyone just worked so well together. After being on one great team, I wanted to be part of another, and when I interviewed, it became clear that this was another dynamic team. It was evolving. It was pushing the outer limits of doing things logistically that the company had not done before.
Q: Can you give me some examples?
A: Well, the plan was to expand our network—our retailers—and invest in better equipment and technology. There was a clear vision of where we wanted to go, and that was to be the premium paint company in the U.S. To do that, you had to have the best logistics processes in place or be working toward that.
Q: What skills and experiences helped you make the transition from the military to the business world?
A: I think dealing with both military and civilians throughout my time was instrumental. It really allowed me to understand that while the two groups are working toward the same goal, they tend to go about it a little differently. So, you have to allow people to take those gifts that they have and let them flourish. I was able to hone my skills with respect to providing guidance and providing oversight without impeding their progress or hurting their morale.
Q: What differences have you found between military logistics and logistics in the private sector?
A: When you look at it from a logistical standpoint, there is not much difference. I almost look at the retailers that we support as the frontline. They are dealing with the public and selling paint and paint products, so we have to do everything in our power to ensure that they have all those assets, all those products, so that they can pay their bills and pay their employees and support the public.
Q: How did you find the overall transition to civilian life? Was it a difficult adjustment?
A: When I submitted my paperwork to retire in 2013, I had roughly eight months in which to go through the transition that the Army offers. I was mentally prepared for it. Now, having said that, I will tell you that there are certain aspects of the transition that are tough to get used to. One is staying in place when you've been used to moving about every three years. You've got to establish some roots. I am fortunate that I have a job that I am very happy with, but that is not the case with some people who are transitioning from the military.
Q: Can you elaborate on that?
A: There are a lot of vets out there who are still unemployed. So, that transition is ongoing with them in a very personal way. This is where we've got to get employers matched up with vets who want jobs. The thing is, you're not going to find a work force out there that is more committed, more loyal, and that has this same level of real-world expertise. It is ready. They just need a chance to be able to go out and become part of another dynamic team.
Q: You spoke at a panel on the Vets To WERC program (an initiative that seeks to match veterans with supply chain job opportunities) at this year's WERC conference. How did you become a part of that?
A: My name came up in conversations with people at Benjamin Moore. We started talking, and they asked me to be on the panel and talk about my experiences. I just think it is an awesome program.
Q: To close, what advice would you offer a veteran who is seeking a career in the private sector?
A: I would say to the vets that are out there that you need to showcase who you are. Showcase what you can bring to a company. Use all those skills that you learned in the military. Don't ever stop trying. There are people out there that want to hire you.
I would say the same thing to employers. You have a work force out there that is absolutely ready to go. And somewhere, you have got to meet.
I am passionate about this issue because there are so many veterans who are still unemployed despite the tight job market. What baffles me is that there's this group of people from the vets side and a group of employers looking for qualified people. Somehow, they just can't seem to get together. So we have to be able to bridge that gap.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."