Before you dig: 11 questions to ask before breaking ground on a new DC
With complex DC design and construction projects, small oversights can lead to big holdups and delays. Asking the right questions beforehand can help keep your project on track.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
Opening a new distribution center (DC) is a major event for any company, but—unless you're Amazon—it's typically not something that you do every month. So it's all too easy to overlook some issues or concerns that could affect the success of the facility (and your entire supply chain) for years to come.
One key to avoiding that trap is to ask the right questions. For example, at the start of the process, when you're considering general locations, these questions would be ones regarding the site's suitability from a distribution network perspective, such as how close you'll be to your customers and suppliers, how good the existing logistics infrastructure is, and how easy or hard it will be to find the right type of employees.
But what about when you have narrowed your search to a few specific sites within your target region? What information do you need to make sure you pick the best possible spot and end up with the best possible DC layout? After talking to a few experts, we have compiled some examples of the kinds of questions companies should ask themselves before breaking ground or signing the lease.
1.Are you sure you have executive buy-in? It may seem obvious that you need executive approval before embarking on a capital project like building a new DC. Yet time and time again, site selection projects are put on hold or delayed because project leaders did not get approval from high enough up the food chain, according to John Morris, who leads the industrial services group for the real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield. For example, Morris remembers one client that had to stop and make its pitch for a new DC three different times—first regionally, then to the company's headquarters in North America, and then again to the world headquarters in Europe. To make sure this doesn't happen to you, get the support and approval of someone at the C-level from the start.
2.Is everyone on the same page? When it comes to designing the building itself, you need not just an architect and a general contractor but also a team of specialists to plot out the work processes and determine the facility's layout. The facility design team should work closely with the operations, finance, and IT (information technology) or systems group to make sure it is accurately capturing the company's existing processes and business. It may also want to consult with your systems integrator and/or equipment suppliers to make sure it has up-to-date info on the equipment's specs and power requirements.
Similarly, it's critical that the design team work hand in hand with the architect, says Mike Kasperski, who leads consulting company enVista's design build team. Otherwise, you might end up having to settle for suboptimal processes or equipment simply because that's what will fit in the building. For example, the type of racking that you'd like to use might work better in a building that's designed with columns that are spaced 52.25 feet apart rather than 50 feet apart. Or the equipment that you're using may require concrete flooring of a certain thickness to ensure that it can support the machines' weight. These things can be changed relatively easily at the design phase but not after the concrete has been poured.
3.Do you have all the data you need? To determine the size and shape of the building, the design team will need access to a vast amount of data, such as annual sales, whether there are seasonal variations or spikes in demand, what your receipts are, and what types of product you have on hand and how much of it. (Some advice on the information that is needed can be found in an enVista white paper titled "Optimum Facility Design.")
4.What are the current processes in your distribution center? It's unlikely that your new facility will be an exact replica of an existing DC. However, it is still crucial to know exactly what processes are followed in the current facility and how product flows through it, says Kasperski. Otherwise, you risk leaving something critical out of the new design.
Furthermore, the information on the current processes should come directly from the employees on the warehouse floor, says Kasperski. Management, he says, is often unaware of exactly how the work is actually done. For example, employees on the floor may know that orders for a particular customer require a special process, but that information might never have been formally documented.
5.Do you expect your business to change in the next five to 10 years? We've all heard of newly constructed facilities that were out of date or at capacity the moment they opened. To lessen the likelihood of that happening to you, find out everything you can about your company's business plan for the next five to 10 years, advises Kasperski. Before you break ground on a new DC, you'll need to know what products you may be selling in the future that you're not selling now and whether they'll have different space or handling requirements. You also should know what markets you may be entering; what types of stores, channels, or businesses you will be serving; and where you expect growth to come from. For example, do you expect a greater percentage of your sales to come from e-commerce five years from now? How could the DC accommodate that? What space or equipment will you need to handle this growth?
6.Is your facility designed to be flexible? Even with all that documentation and planning, your business is bound to encounter unforeseen challenges and opportunities. Will your new facility be flexible enough to meet them? For example, Kasperski recommends making sure that your facility is designed with some free operating space. "If you fill up your DC with a whole bunch of material handling equipment," he says, "then there's no space for special projects or seasonal spikes or promotions that you may have."
Similarly, think carefully before committing to a highly automated DC, he says. While the automated equipment may save you labor costs, it may make it harder to adapt to business changes such as new products or an increase in e-commerce sales.
7.Can your existing IT system handle the new facility design? As you design your facility, it's important to know what your systems—whether they're warehouse management systems (WMS), enterprise resource planning systems, or order management systems—can and cannot do, Kasperski says.
"If you are not planning on spending a couple million on a new WMS, you'd better understand the capabilities of the current one," he warns. "Because you can design the most beautiful left-handed flapjack turner ever, but if your WMS doesn't support it, it doesn't do you any good."
8.What risks is the site vulnerable to? If companies were not already concerned about their facilities' risk of flooding, hurricanes Harvey and Irma certainly put the issue top of mind. Similarly, companies should know about the risk of earthquakes, fire, high winds, and other natural and human-caused disasters in the area.
"It's not so much that these factors get overlooked, as companies try to cut it too close," warns Carl Solly, vice president and chief engineer of the insurance company FM Global. "Sometimes, companies see that they are six inches in elevation outside of the 100-year flood zone and declare victory. But flood zones are an approximation, and flooding can get much more severe."
For this reason, FM Global currently recommends to its clients that any new facility be at least a foot outside of the 500-year flood zone.
If it's not possible to locate your facility outside of a risk area, consider what alterations can be made to the site or building to minimize the risk. In areas at high risk of flooding, for example, companies could bring in fill to raise the building up two or three feet, use flood barriers or gates, or even just make sure that product is not stored on the floor.
9.What kind of infrastructure and resources does the community have in place? Local infrastructure and resources can make a big difference in how quickly a DC rebounds from a disaster or event, Solly says. For example, what are the roads into and out of the facility like? Are they prone to flooding? What is the local fire department like; could it handle a high-challenge fire? How would firefighters access the site? If you're outside the flood zone, are you protected by a levy? If so, is that levy adequately maintained?
According to Solly, it is good practice to consult with your insurance company on possible risks and hazards once you have narrowed down your search to two to three sites.
In addition to evaluating the quality of local infrastructure and resources, companies need to find out what ordinances or regulations may apply to their new DC. For example, is there a height restriction due to a nearby airport or other local ordinances? Are there limitations on road access? What are the fire regulations in the community?
10.Who are the people in your neighborhood? Companies need to look not only at what is on the land they plan to acquire or rent, but also at what is happening on adjacent properties, says Solly. For example, are you next to a chemical plant that could release hazardous materials? Does your neighbor store highly combustible materials—such as big stacks of empty pallets—in its yard?
"There is likely no way to clearly understand the neighbors' risk or risk management plan, but it makes good sense to consider the potential based on publicly available information and make an informed choice," Solly says.
11.Have you given yourself enough time? According to Morris of Cushman & Wakefield, this is one of the most important questions companies should ask themselves before they start the site selection process. "[Not giving yourself enough time] is one of the most common mistakes, and it is certainly the most impactful," he says.
For a typical warehouse or distribution facility, Morris recommends giving yourself three months after you've selected the building site to properly vet the location and property before you sign the certificate of occupancy or the initial lease. For more complicated facilities that involve manufacturing, that timeframe can extend to as much as two years.
Many of the other problems that crop up can be resolved as long as you've allowed enough time in the schedule. If you start the process and then discover you don't have all the information you need to design a facility, you can stop and conduct a more thorough analysis ... as long as you have enough time. Likewise, if you find that you haven't gotten buy-in from all the appropriate parties, you can stop and "resell" the project ... but again, only if you have enough time. A much more difficult obstacle is adding more time to a project timeline, Morris says.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."