Before you dig: 11 questions to ask before breaking ground on a new DC
With complex DC design and construction projects, small oversights can lead to big holdups and delays. Asking the right questions beforehand can help keep your project on track.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
Opening a new distribution center (DC) is a major event for any company, but—unless you're Amazon—it's typically not something that you do every month. So it's all too easy to overlook some issues or concerns that could affect the success of the facility (and your entire supply chain) for years to come.
One key to avoiding that trap is to ask the right questions. For example, at the start of the process, when you're considering general locations, these questions would be ones regarding the site's suitability from a distribution network perspective, such as how close you'll be to your customers and suppliers, how good the existing logistics infrastructure is, and how easy or hard it will be to find the right type of employees.
But what about when you have narrowed your search to a few specific sites within your target region? What information do you need to make sure you pick the best possible spot and end up with the best possible DC layout? After talking to a few experts, we have compiled some examples of the kinds of questions companies should ask themselves before breaking ground or signing the lease.
1.Are you sure you have executive buy-in? It may seem obvious that you need executive approval before embarking on a capital project like building a new DC. Yet time and time again, site selection projects are put on hold or delayed because project leaders did not get approval from high enough up the food chain, according to John Morris, who leads the industrial services group for the real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield. For example, Morris remembers one client that had to stop and make its pitch for a new DC three different times—first regionally, then to the company's headquarters in North America, and then again to the world headquarters in Europe. To make sure this doesn't happen to you, get the support and approval of someone at the C-level from the start.
2.Is everyone on the same page? When it comes to designing the building itself, you need not just an architect and a general contractor but also a team of specialists to plot out the work processes and determine the facility's layout. The facility design team should work closely with the operations, finance, and IT (information technology) or systems group to make sure it is accurately capturing the company's existing processes and business. It may also want to consult with your systems integrator and/or equipment suppliers to make sure it has up-to-date info on the equipment's specs and power requirements.
Similarly, it's critical that the design team work hand in hand with the architect, says Mike Kasperski, who leads consulting company enVista's design build team. Otherwise, you might end up having to settle for suboptimal processes or equipment simply because that's what will fit in the building. For example, the type of racking that you'd like to use might work better in a building that's designed with columns that are spaced 52.25 feet apart rather than 50 feet apart. Or the equipment that you're using may require concrete flooring of a certain thickness to ensure that it can support the machines' weight. These things can be changed relatively easily at the design phase but not after the concrete has been poured.
3.Do you have all the data you need? To determine the size and shape of the building, the design team will need access to a vast amount of data, such as annual sales, whether there are seasonal variations or spikes in demand, what your receipts are, and what types of product you have on hand and how much of it. (Some advice on the information that is needed can be found in an enVista white paper titled "Optimum Facility Design.")
4.What are the current processes in your distribution center? It's unlikely that your new facility will be an exact replica of an existing DC. However, it is still crucial to know exactly what processes are followed in the current facility and how product flows through it, says Kasperski. Otherwise, you risk leaving something critical out of the new design.
Furthermore, the information on the current processes should come directly from the employees on the warehouse floor, says Kasperski. Management, he says, is often unaware of exactly how the work is actually done. For example, employees on the floor may know that orders for a particular customer require a special process, but that information might never have been formally documented.
5.Do you expect your business to change in the next five to 10 years? We've all heard of newly constructed facilities that were out of date or at capacity the moment they opened. To lessen the likelihood of that happening to you, find out everything you can about your company's business plan for the next five to 10 years, advises Kasperski. Before you break ground on a new DC, you'll need to know what products you may be selling in the future that you're not selling now and whether they'll have different space or handling requirements. You also should know what markets you may be entering; what types of stores, channels, or businesses you will be serving; and where you expect growth to come from. For example, do you expect a greater percentage of your sales to come from e-commerce five years from now? How could the DC accommodate that? What space or equipment will you need to handle this growth?
6.Is your facility designed to be flexible? Even with all that documentation and planning, your business is bound to encounter unforeseen challenges and opportunities. Will your new facility be flexible enough to meet them? For example, Kasperski recommends making sure that your facility is designed with some free operating space. "If you fill up your DC with a whole bunch of material handling equipment," he says, "then there's no space for special projects or seasonal spikes or promotions that you may have."
Similarly, think carefully before committing to a highly automated DC, he says. While the automated equipment may save you labor costs, it may make it harder to adapt to business changes such as new products or an increase in e-commerce sales.
7.Can your existing IT system handle the new facility design? As you design your facility, it's important to know what your systems—whether they're warehouse management systems (WMS), enterprise resource planning systems, or order management systems—can and cannot do, Kasperski says.
"If you are not planning on spending a couple million on a new WMS, you'd better understand the capabilities of the current one," he warns. "Because you can design the most beautiful left-handed flapjack turner ever, but if your WMS doesn't support it, it doesn't do you any good."
8.What risks is the site vulnerable to? If companies were not already concerned about their facilities' risk of flooding, hurricanes Harvey and Irma certainly put the issue top of mind. Similarly, companies should know about the risk of earthquakes, fire, high winds, and other natural and human-caused disasters in the area.
"It's not so much that these factors get overlooked, as companies try to cut it too close," warns Carl Solly, vice president and chief engineer of the insurance company FM Global. "Sometimes, companies see that they are six inches in elevation outside of the 100-year flood zone and declare victory. But flood zones are an approximation, and flooding can get much more severe."
For this reason, FM Global currently recommends to its clients that any new facility be at least a foot outside of the 500-year flood zone.
If it's not possible to locate your facility outside of a risk area, consider what alterations can be made to the site or building to minimize the risk. In areas at high risk of flooding, for example, companies could bring in fill to raise the building up two or three feet, use flood barriers or gates, or even just make sure that product is not stored on the floor.
9.What kind of infrastructure and resources does the community have in place? Local infrastructure and resources can make a big difference in how quickly a DC rebounds from a disaster or event, Solly says. For example, what are the roads into and out of the facility like? Are they prone to flooding? What is the local fire department like; could it handle a high-challenge fire? How would firefighters access the site? If you're outside the flood zone, are you protected by a levy? If so, is that levy adequately maintained?
According to Solly, it is good practice to consult with your insurance company on possible risks and hazards once you have narrowed down your search to two to three sites.
In addition to evaluating the quality of local infrastructure and resources, companies need to find out what ordinances or regulations may apply to their new DC. For example, is there a height restriction due to a nearby airport or other local ordinances? Are there limitations on road access? What are the fire regulations in the community?
10.Who are the people in your neighborhood? Companies need to look not only at what is on the land they plan to acquire or rent, but also at what is happening on adjacent properties, says Solly. For example, are you next to a chemical plant that could release hazardous materials? Does your neighbor store highly combustible materials—such as big stacks of empty pallets—in its yard?
"There is likely no way to clearly understand the neighbors' risk or risk management plan, but it makes good sense to consider the potential based on publicly available information and make an informed choice," Solly says.
11.Have you given yourself enough time? According to Morris of Cushman & Wakefield, this is one of the most important questions companies should ask themselves before they start the site selection process. "[Not giving yourself enough time] is one of the most common mistakes, and it is certainly the most impactful," he says.
For a typical warehouse or distribution facility, Morris recommends giving yourself three months after you've selected the building site to properly vet the location and property before you sign the certificate of occupancy or the initial lease. For more complicated facilities that involve manufacturing, that timeframe can extend to as much as two years.
Many of the other problems that crop up can be resolved as long as you've allowed enough time in the schedule. If you start the process and then discover you don't have all the information you need to design a facility, you can stop and conduct a more thorough analysis ... as long as you have enough time. Likewise, if you find that you haven't gotten buy-in from all the appropriate parties, you can stop and "resell" the project ... but again, only if you have enough time. A much more difficult obstacle is adding more time to a project timeline, Morris says.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.