Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
For nearly 25 years, Transplace, a third-party logistics service provider (3PL) based in the Dallas suburb of Frisco, Texas, has carved out a successful living in North America. Transplace's home market remains robust, with at least five years of abundant opportunities left to it, said Frank McGuigan, the company's president and chief operating officer.
Yet when the privately held company looked for a new owner after its private equity fund parent made plans to sell, it had more than North America on its mind. Transplace wanted a buyer to have a global network should it decide to expand beyond North America, a scenario that Transplace has discussed with many customers who want it to go global, McGuigan said.
In mid-August, Transplace's parent, Greenbriar Capital, sold it to private equity behemoth TPG, a $73 billion company with 16 offices worldwide. Transplace will leverage TPG's capital and footprint to make selective acquisitions, though McGuigan said there is no concrete plan for the company to make international deals.
Two years before, the transport and logistics services powerhouse XPO Logistics Inc. pursued Jacobson Cos., a U.S.-based contract logistics, transport management, and packaging company, but lost out to French trucking and logistics company Norbert Dentressangle S.A. XPO Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Brad Jacobs knew little or nothing about the company that had prevailed over his. "I had trouble even pronouncing it at first," he said.
However, as Jacobs analyzed Dentressangle's business, he realized the two companies were mirror images of each other. Less than a year later, Greenwich, Conn.-based XPO acquired Lyon-based Dentressangle in a $3.5 billion deal that would become the springboard for XPO's European expansion. Today, the company operates in 31 countries and is plotting additional overseas moves by leveraging an $8 billion war chest generated from a recent secondary equity offering.
Jacobs said XPO would have eventually gone global because its multinational customer base would have demanded it. But those plans weren't on the drawing board in mid-2015. The Dentressangle deal was "completely opportunistic," he said.
THERE FOR THE TAKING?
Not every U.S. 3PL has access to private equity as Transplace does or deep internal resources like XPO's. Nor is every 3PL like giant C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc., which in 2012 acquired Phoenix International, an international freight forwarder and customs broker, for $635 million—a move that overnight more than doubled the revenue of Robinson's global forwarding unit—and then followed it up last year by buying Australian 3PL APC Logistics for $225 million.
Yet that shouldn't stop 3PLs of all sizes from casting their nets outside the U.S., because that's where the growth is, according to Evan Armstrong, president of consultancy Armstrong & Associates Inc. According to Armstrong data, China, India, Russia, and the Asia-Pacific will generates the highest growth rates for 3PL services from 2016 through 2022, expanding at an annual compound rate of 8 percent a year during that time. By contrast, the North American market is projected to grow by 5.2 percent a year through 2022, Armstrong said.
As Asian consumers accumulate wealth and increase their consumption, services are shifting to support intraregional ground distribution and away from export-related activity, Armstrong said. "3PLs providing value-added warehousing and distribution, and cross-border transportation management services in these countries are experiencing significant growth," he wrote in a note.
Another reason to go abroad is that expansion-minded customers will want their service partners to be in as many markets as possible, Jacobs said. Large global accounts will, almost by definition, be off-limits to providers whose geographies don't align with their clients', he added.
U.S. firms not operating outside North America "should listen to their customers and find ways to leverage operational strengths" to enlarge their footprint, Armstrong urged. That will usually mean an acquisition versus organic growth, he said.
That is all very well, but for small to mid-sized U.S. 3PLs with champagne tastes and (perhaps) beer budgets, jumping into global markets presents a bevy of challenges. Unlike the homogeneity of U.S. commerce, working in global markets means multiple customs borders, languages, cultures, and currencies.
Going abroad also means butting heads with a raft of seasoned competitors. For example, European-based 3PLs like Panalpina, DHL Global Forwarding, Kuehne + Nagel, Schenker, and Ceva Logistics have decades of experience serving global markets and have the resources to go, without much friction, where customer demand takes them.
U.S. 3PLs should also know that while Europe's transport and distribution infrastructure is more unified than ever, there are still differences among the continent's trading partners that could affect operations, said Alex LeRoy, a 3PL analyst for Transport Intelligence, a U.K. consultancy. LeRoy said the European 3PL market may be too established and saturated for U.S. firms to break into and advised them to focus on the Asia-Pacific marketplace, which is not nearly as mature and where the growth rates are "so inviting that you can't ignore it."
HELP ON THE GROUND
To ease their way into unfamiliar markets, 3PLs sometimes turn to outside help. Matson Logistics, the North American 3PL unit of liner company Matson Shipping, will often enter international markets through a relationship with a local agent with existing operations, said Jeffrey Ivinski, director of supply chain marketing and sales for the Concord, Calif.-based company. Once Matson Logistics gains experience and volume with a market, it may look to structure its own entity and on-the-ground presence in that location, Ivinski said.
Using an agent appears a prudent step for a newcomer, but it carries its own risks, according to Mike Short, president of C.H. Robinson's global forwarding unit. Because most agents don't work exclusively for one 3PL, a company entering a market is not going to be the agent's sole focus, Short said. Without a commitment to exclusivity on an agent's part, a 3PL without a physical presence in a foreign land may not have the visibility into its business there that it needs, Short said.
The arena of customs compliance, where failure to meet complex and precise government requirements can result in hefty penalties and delayed shipments, is where agents can stumble, Short said. Ongoing training and education is essential for proper compliance, yet agents cannot devote their full training efforts to one 3PL, according to Short. Robinson employs a staff of 80 full-time compliance educators and trainers, backed by a team of auditors, Short said. This gives Robinson the "boots on the ground" needed to facilitate the penetration of overseas markets, he said.
Jacobs of XPO said a U.S. 3PL seeking to go abroad should be led by executives seasoned in the ways of global commerce. This is an important step to developing a "global approach" that promotes the concept of a single brand that's bringing a coherent message to market, which is why XPO is unlikely to seek out agents as it expands its international presence, according to Jacobs.
A guiding principle for 3PLs to follow is to apply overseas the unique capabilities that made them competitive in the U.S., said Paul Man, head of North Asia for APL Logistics, a Singapore-based 3PL that has served the U.S. since 1980. Man said 3PLs will need to properly segment their market and then deliver value-added solutions to appeal to a new customer base. That may sound like 3PL 101, yet it's a universal philosophy that is likely to work in any geography.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.