Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
For nearly 25 years, Transplace, a third-party logistics service provider (3PL) based in the Dallas suburb of Frisco, Texas, has carved out a successful living in North America. Transplace's home market remains robust, with at least five years of abundant opportunities left to it, said Frank McGuigan, the company's president and chief operating officer.
Yet when the privately held company looked for a new owner after its private equity fund parent made plans to sell, it had more than North America on its mind. Transplace wanted a buyer to have a global network should it decide to expand beyond North America, a scenario that Transplace has discussed with many customers who want it to go global, McGuigan said.
In mid-August, Transplace's parent, Greenbriar Capital, sold it to private equity behemoth TPG, a $73 billion company with 16 offices worldwide. Transplace will leverage TPG's capital and footprint to make selective acquisitions, though McGuigan said there is no concrete plan for the company to make international deals.
Two years before, the transport and logistics services powerhouse XPO Logistics Inc. pursued Jacobson Cos., a U.S.-based contract logistics, transport management, and packaging company, but lost out to French trucking and logistics company Norbert Dentressangle S.A. XPO Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Brad Jacobs knew little or nothing about the company that had prevailed over his. "I had trouble even pronouncing it at first," he said.
However, as Jacobs analyzed Dentressangle's business, he realized the two companies were mirror images of each other. Less than a year later, Greenwich, Conn.-based XPO acquired Lyon-based Dentressangle in a $3.5 billion deal that would become the springboard for XPO's European expansion. Today, the company operates in 31 countries and is plotting additional overseas moves by leveraging an $8 billion war chest generated from a recent secondary equity offering.
Jacobs said XPO would have eventually gone global because its multinational customer base would have demanded it. But those plans weren't on the drawing board in mid-2015. The Dentressangle deal was "completely opportunistic," he said.
THERE FOR THE TAKING?
Not every U.S. 3PL has access to private equity as Transplace does or deep internal resources like XPO's. Nor is every 3PL like giant C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc., which in 2012 acquired Phoenix International, an international freight forwarder and customs broker, for $635 million—a move that overnight more than doubled the revenue of Robinson's global forwarding unit—and then followed it up last year by buying Australian 3PL APC Logistics for $225 million.
Yet that shouldn't stop 3PLs of all sizes from casting their nets outside the U.S., because that's where the growth is, according to Evan Armstrong, president of consultancy Armstrong & Associates Inc. According to Armstrong data, China, India, Russia, and the Asia-Pacific will generates the highest growth rates for 3PL services from 2016 through 2022, expanding at an annual compound rate of 8 percent a year during that time. By contrast, the North American market is projected to grow by 5.2 percent a year through 2022, Armstrong said.
As Asian consumers accumulate wealth and increase their consumption, services are shifting to support intraregional ground distribution and away from export-related activity, Armstrong said. "3PLs providing value-added warehousing and distribution, and cross-border transportation management services in these countries are experiencing significant growth," he wrote in a note.
Another reason to go abroad is that expansion-minded customers will want their service partners to be in as many markets as possible, Jacobs said. Large global accounts will, almost by definition, be off-limits to providers whose geographies don't align with their clients', he added.
U.S. firms not operating outside North America "should listen to their customers and find ways to leverage operational strengths" to enlarge their footprint, Armstrong urged. That will usually mean an acquisition versus organic growth, he said.
That is all very well, but for small to mid-sized U.S. 3PLs with champagne tastes and (perhaps) beer budgets, jumping into global markets presents a bevy of challenges. Unlike the homogeneity of U.S. commerce, working in global markets means multiple customs borders, languages, cultures, and currencies.
Going abroad also means butting heads with a raft of seasoned competitors. For example, European-based 3PLs like Panalpina, DHL Global Forwarding, Kuehne + Nagel, Schenker, and Ceva Logistics have decades of experience serving global markets and have the resources to go, without much friction, where customer demand takes them.
U.S. 3PLs should also know that while Europe's transport and distribution infrastructure is more unified than ever, there are still differences among the continent's trading partners that could affect operations, said Alex LeRoy, a 3PL analyst for Transport Intelligence, a U.K. consultancy. LeRoy said the European 3PL market may be too established and saturated for U.S. firms to break into and advised them to focus on the Asia-Pacific marketplace, which is not nearly as mature and where the growth rates are "so inviting that you can't ignore it."
HELP ON THE GROUND
To ease their way into unfamiliar markets, 3PLs sometimes turn to outside help. Matson Logistics, the North American 3PL unit of liner company Matson Shipping, will often enter international markets through a relationship with a local agent with existing operations, said Jeffrey Ivinski, director of supply chain marketing and sales for the Concord, Calif.-based company. Once Matson Logistics gains experience and volume with a market, it may look to structure its own entity and on-the-ground presence in that location, Ivinski said.
Using an agent appears a prudent step for a newcomer, but it carries its own risks, according to Mike Short, president of C.H. Robinson's global forwarding unit. Because most agents don't work exclusively for one 3PL, a company entering a market is not going to be the agent's sole focus, Short said. Without a commitment to exclusivity on an agent's part, a 3PL without a physical presence in a foreign land may not have the visibility into its business there that it needs, Short said.
The arena of customs compliance, where failure to meet complex and precise government requirements can result in hefty penalties and delayed shipments, is where agents can stumble, Short said. Ongoing training and education is essential for proper compliance, yet agents cannot devote their full training efforts to one 3PL, according to Short. Robinson employs a staff of 80 full-time compliance educators and trainers, backed by a team of auditors, Short said. This gives Robinson the "boots on the ground" needed to facilitate the penetration of overseas markets, he said.
Jacobs of XPO said a U.S. 3PL seeking to go abroad should be led by executives seasoned in the ways of global commerce. This is an important step to developing a "global approach" that promotes the concept of a single brand that's bringing a coherent message to market, which is why XPO is unlikely to seek out agents as it expands its international presence, according to Jacobs.
A guiding principle for 3PLs to follow is to apply overseas the unique capabilities that made them competitive in the U.S., said Paul Man, head of North Asia for APL Logistics, a Singapore-based 3PL that has served the U.S. since 1980. Man said 3PLs will need to properly segment their market and then deliver value-added solutions to appeal to a new customer base. That may sound like 3PL 101, yet it's a universal philosophy that is likely to work in any geography.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.