Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
No one has to give Peter Edlund religion in the value of cloud-based supply chain management systems. Edlund is a founder and senior vice president of global product marketing of DiCentral Corp., a global business-to-business IT integration provider that serves as the backbone for the various systems that connect supply chains. He and his company are also based in Houston, which will likely always be remembered as the city nearly drowned by a hurricane.
Because Harvey did not disrupt DiCentral's operations, it was able to meet its service commitments to customers nationwide that still needed to get goods to market. Still, it didn't stop Edlund from surveying the major damage inflicted on his hometown, and wondering how many firms using on-premises software platforms were flooded out and couldn't recover as fast as they would have liked. By contrast, firms that already had data in the cloud—and hadn't lost electricity--could quickly reconfigure their networks, re-direct purchase order flows, notify their carriers of changes in routing, and re-distribute their inventory as quickly as possible, Edlund said.
The back-to-back monsters of hurricanes Harvey and Irma—which have been conjoined into the apropos moniker "Harma"—will provide much fodder into the fall and winter in the discussion of the increasing need for resiliency and redundancy. It may also provide fresh impetus to the conversations about cloud computing, which refers to the sharing of resources, software, and information via the Internet, where data is stored on physical servers maintained and controlled by a provider. While the storms may not trigger a wholesale migration to the cloud, internal champions of a cloud-based strategy will "have more ammunition to push it further," Edlund said in a phone interview yesterday.
A cloud network, which eliminates the need for the user to install software on premises, can result in considerable cost savings because of reduced staffing, maintenance, and power consumption, among other factors. However, it is not a panacea. Businesses have poured considerable investments into on-premises networks, and are loath to dismantle them for a technology that isn't as well-proven. In addition, power outages can shut down access to key data; in Florida, where Irma's fierce winds and storm surges toppled power lines statewide, taking the Internet with it, on-premises systems would have allowed a user to remain operational, providing the physical structure wasn't flattened.
Ian Hobkirk, managing director of Commonwealth Supply Chain Advisors, a supply chain consultancy that works closely in the warehouse management systems (WMS) segment, said his firm hasn't heard of many instances where a natural disaster will trigger a migration to a cloud-based WMS. In fact, it might result in the opposite behavior, he said. Following Superstorm Sandy's assault on the New York metro area in October 2012, a Commonwealth client engaged in a WMS selection project deliberately steered clear of a cloud-based solution because its on-premises network had kept it operating through the storm, while its cloud-based rivals all went offline, Hobkirk said.
Back to Work
On the physical front, the recovery from Irma continues as fast as can be expected. The Florida seaports, as well as the Ports of Savannah and Charleston, are back in operation. Georgia's Port of Brunswick, which handles roll-on, roll-off traffic and bulk and breakbulk cargoes, is still shut due to a lack of power, according to the Georgia Ports Authority (GPA), which runs both ports. Airport operations in Florida are resuming at a limited clip.
UPS Inc. said today it continues to report service disruptions in the Florida Keys as well as along the corridor linking Brunswick, Ga., to Jacksonville, Fla., due to flooded roads. The Atlanta-based transport and logistics giant is also dealing with localized flooding in cities like Charleston, where all ZIP codes are being served, but not every address within that ZIP code is sufficiently passable for drivers to make deliveries.
The two main eastern railroads, Norfolk, Va.-based Norfolk Southern Corp. and Jacksonville-based CSX Corp., have notified customers to expect traffic delays in the affected areas. Norfolk Southern said in a service update last night that it projects freight delays of two to three days through areas disrupted by power outages. CSX said it expects to resume service to Tampa tonight. Its service operations teams are working to restore its facility in Tampa, Fla. and expect to resume service tonight, Sept. 13. Its Jacksonville-Orlando corridor is still out of service pending repairs, CSX said. No time frame has been determined for resumption of service on the lane.
All of CSX's intermodal traffic destined for Florida East Coast Railway locations at Fort Lauderdale, Fort Pierce, Miami, and Port Miami has resumed, CSX said. Florida East Coast operates a 351-mile line between Jacksonville and Miami with multiple intermediate points.
In Irma's wake, truckload spot, or non-contract, rates have risen even in markets as far north as Philadelphia and Buffalo, a common occurrence when freight flows migrate southward, according to DAT Solutions, a consultancy that closely tracks spot market trends. Spot rates into Florida have spiked as shipments of emergency supplies, often at premium rates, are trucked into staging areas near affected regions.
Being mainly a consumption market, Florida has little in the way of manufacturing.
Most inbound dry van shipments will be consumer goads and while flatbed hauls will be mostly comprised of wallboard for housing repair, according to consultancy FTR.
Noel Perry, chief economist for consultancy Truckstop.com and a principal at FTR, said the back-to-back storms are expected to shave about one-half of 1 percent from U.S. GDP in the third quarter. Florida and Texas combined represent about 15 percent of the U.S. economy, and about 7 percent of U.S. trucking activity on a typical day, Perry said.
Perry said at an FTR conference earlier this week that trucking volumes in the Southeast will drop by 25 percent this week. Rates on Florida inbound hauls could spike 10 to 30 percent this week, and level off next week as volumes return to normal, Perry predicted.
As with Harvey, there should be strong trucker demand for so-called "FEMA Freight," high-margin shipments of emergency supplies. However, drivers are being cautioned that it may take a couple of days to offload the goods at staging areas, and that there may not be abundant pickings of outbound hauls once the inbound freight is offloaded.
Over the medium to long term, two major storms in three weeks will strain supply chain networks and resources, especially when it comes to allocating human capital to respond and rebuild, according to Chloe Demrovsky, president and CEO of Disaster Recovery Institute International, a non-profit group that helps organizations prepare for and recover from disasters. "With the ever-present pressure for efficiency, many business continuity, risk management, and supply chain management programs have been merged, restructured, or scaled back," Demrovsky said in an e-mail. "That leaves fewer hands on deck when it comes to dealing with a disaster."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."