Can truckers learn to stop worrying and love the mandate?
As the mid-December deadline looms for compliance with the electronic logging device mandate, experts say truckers can weather the storm and even profit from the experience—as long as shippers do their bit.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Motor carrier executives have long warned shippers that unless they make it easier for drivers to operate legally as well as efficiently, they could find themselves short of capacity or discover their wheels cost far more than they have in the past. The warnings have often fallen on deaf ears, however. Many shippers assume their carriers will overcome any obstacle to deliver the goods. Or they are oblivious to possible changes that may upend their universe.
This "ignorance is bliss" era is ending, not because of carrier jawboning but because of the long arm of the federal government. Under Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) rules, effective Dec. 18, all trucks built after the year 2000 must be equipped with electronic logging devices (ELDs) to comply with driver hours-of-service regulations. (Fleets with older electronic onboard recorders have until December 2019 to bring their systems up to current standards.) FMCSA, a subagency of the Department of Transportation, recently embarked on a nationwide road show to educate stakeholders on the mandate and its ramifications.
At this writing, the Owner-Operators Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), which hates the mandate, is lobbying Congress and the Trump administration to delay or overturn it. But the chances of either happening are slim. The mandate has twice been upheld in federal appeals court, and the U.S. Supreme Court has denied the owner-operator group's petition to hear the case.
Official numbers are impossible to come by, but several industry estimates put the number of U.S. commercial truck drivers working beyond the legal limits and falsifying their paper logs at 10 to 20 percent of a 3.5 million-strong workforce. Ken Harper, marketing director for DAT Solutions, a loadboard operator, goes several steps further, contending that all owner-operators fudge their paper logs to some degree.
It is believed that about half of the commercial motor vehicles in operation are not yet equipped with ELDs. Harper said that a DAT survey of around 20,000 carriers and owner-operators conducted in June found that surprisingly few respondents were in compliance with the mandate.
SAFETY FIRST, ECONOMICS A CLOSE SECOND
By forcing all drivers to operate in the same way, safety regulators believe the rule will keep tired drivers from logging extra miles to meet a delivery commitment when by law, they should already be off the road. Beyond the safety priorities, however, is the increasing awareness that the mandate will change trucking's economic ecosystem in ways shippers can't imagine, and may not be prepared for.
For example, how will shippers adjust when they find that loads once moved by drivers exceeding the legal limit either don't get moved as intended or are moved at a much higher price? How will shippers and receivers react when a driver pulls in to a loading dock with cargo to unload and no spare time on his or her hours of service, which can no longer be altered by paper logs? Then there is the widespread speculation that many solo drivers—the backbone of the U.S. trucking fleet—will exit the business because they lack the scale and resources to operate efficiently without effectively flouting the hours-of-service rules.
Eric Fuller, chief executive officer of Chattanooga, Tenn.-based US Xpress Inc., the largest privately held truckload carrier, expects that many shipments with 500- to 700-mile lengths of haul, which might move in one workday with a little paper-log fudging, will find fewer takers in an ELD world. Tommy Hodges, a trucking industry veteran and chairman of Shelbyville, Tenn.-based truckload carrier Titan Transfer Inc., said the mandate's impact will be keenly felt in densely populated, traffic-clogged regions like the Northeast, where congestion will only amplify the time pressures on drivers who no longer have the option of manipulating logbooks.
Some high-density markets may go unserved because the mandate makes it impossible to hit delivery targets without fudging logbooks, Hodges said. Shippers in some markets will face freight rates that are much higher than they're accustomed to, he added. The mandate will aggravate an acute capacity shortage in some traffic lanes, according to Hodges. Space in some lanes is already so tight that rates are as much as six times higher than they've been in the very recent past, he said.
A HOUSE DIVIDED
Given how high the stakes are, shippers have been surprisingly slow off the mark in preparing for the mandate, experts said. According to Fuller, US Xpress's shipper universe is split between those who fully grasp the mandate's impact and are getting as ready as possible, and those who don't know or care. "There really is no middle ground," he said.
Nor is a shipper's size or its freight spend a predictor of involvement: One of the country's largest shippers, who Fuller declined to identify, has done nothing to prepare for the mandate, he said.
Jacksonville, Fla.-based truckload carrier Landstar System Inc. has tried to emphasize to shippers the importance of their role in making ELD compliance work, according to Mike Cobb, Landstar's vice president of safety and compliance. "It's imperative that shippers understand this. For the most part, though, shippers don't get it."
Private fleets, which are operated by some of the country's biggest retailers, have a similarly cloudy view of the landscape, according to Ryder System Inc., the Miami-based transportation giant that has many large private fleet customers. "They are either unaware of the compliance of their drivers, or they know that they are not complying but don't have a way to determine the total cost around how it will affect them from a productivity or profitability standpoint," said John Diez, president of Ryder's Dedicated Transportation Solutions unit.
Many shippers, of course, are very aware. For example, some have taken the step of informing their carriers that unless their fleets are already ELD-compliant or that they can show a firm road map to getting there in the very near future, the shipper will need to explore other options to get its freight moved.
TOUGH LOVE
The irony is that, after a difficult transition period during which a high-single-digit productivity drop is expected because of reduced equipment utilization, ELD implementation will ultimately yield a more efficient and responsive trucking supply chain, according to various experts.
John Seidl, a former Wisconsin state trooper and FMCSA investigator who is working with Arrive Logistics, an Austin, Texas-based third-party logistics service provider, to help carriers understand the mandate, said carrier revenues will decline because fleets and drivers won't be chasing as much freight that rests on the hours-of-service bubble. However, efficiency and profitability gains should offset the revenue decline because ELDs will provide the needed visibility to optimize load planning, Seidl said.
Hodges of Titan expects that carriers will struggle at first to master the torrent of digital data coming at them. Once they do, however, they will be able to turn the data to their advantage. After being behind the productivity curve at the outset of its ELD conversion five years ago, Titan is notching gains today as a result of the technology, he said.
Owner-operators can benefit from ELD use, especially if they drive exclusively for large carriers and are tied into their systems, experts said. Solo drivers should also be spending less time doing paperwork and more time keeping the wheels turning. "Our experience has shown that once drivers experience the benefits of an electronic log, they don't want to go back to paper logs," said Tony Forrest, director of product management for Omnitracs LLC, a Dallas-based fleet management software provider.
The mandate will minister tough love of sorts for shippers, who will have to shed their long-held ambivalence toward the folks who haul their freight. Harper of DAT said shippers "will put pressure on their docks to clean up their act," adding that the level of visibility enabled by ELDs will be "startling" compared with what is out there today.
The payoff will be a trucking industry that's held to a much higher standard than perhaps it has ever been, according to Harper. "The levels and expectations of service that once applied only to big carriers will now apply to everyone," he said.
And as the industry sheds its rogue status, drivers will finally get the respect from shippers they deserve, according to Hodges. "What the mandate will do, over time, is end the shipping and receiving public's abuse of drivers," he said.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."